Added downforce effects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apoxin
  • 16 comments
  • 1,387 views
Messages
89
United States
United States
Messages
oldmanzhang
I'm not sure whether or not adding downforce to a car will be beneficial or detrimental to my 1/4 mile drag times... can anyone help?
 
If it is a FR(Front engined rear wheel drive) then it will almost always benefit from the extra downforce of a rear wing. Other cars are much different and it can be a case by case decision as to the effectiveness if at all of extra downforce. Hope this answers most of your question.
 
Whats up k? And yeah, downforce is really only good on fr cars when it comes to 1/4
 
Whats up k? And yeah, downforce is really only good on fr cars when it comes to 1/4

And mr, and 4wd, and rr...

well I was thinking in general, but specifically I guess the gtr and the viper srt10

definitely want a wing and max downforce on the viper

as for the GTR 12. put a wing on it, but minimum downforce. specv max downforce. r35 tc max front and rear
 
Simple answer, anything with power going to the rear wheels will need one once there is enough power to make it give an advantage. This is where i'm not 100% but so far, anything faster than my R33 GT-R has needed one to get faster times but when it comes to the setting for downforce (ie: minimum or maximum) it's still something I haven't delved far enough into yet. I'm sure others here have as one person above has stated at the 2009 R35 Spec V performance level you might want minimum but above may want maximum though I can't say from what I know just yet. Hope this helps you somewhat.
 
Last edited:
MNP
Simple answer, anything with power going to the rear wheels will need one once there is enough power to make it give an advantage. This is where i'm not 100% but so far, anything faster than my R33 GT-R has needed one to get faster times but when it comes to the setting for downforce (ie: minimum or maximum) it's still something I haven't delved far enough into yet. I'm sure others here have as one person above has stated at the 2009 R35 Spec V performance level you might want minimum but above may want maximum though I can't say from what I know just yet. Hope this helps you somewhat.

For my spec v time the wing was on default downforce. After meticulous testing on GTRs this seemed best for overall times (for my tunes at least) It's all about balancing launch or top end 👍

If anything I only notice small changes in overall time but large variances in 0-60 and 0-100 times
 
Last edited:
Wrong. Most AWDs dont prefer downforce.

wrong, please try again

For my spec v time the wing was on default downforce. After meticulous testing on GTRs this seemed best for overall times (for my tunes at least) It's all about balancing launch or top end 👍

If anything I only notice small changes in overall time but large variances in 0-60 and 0-100 times

👍 to the bolded part

Most of the time min/max downforce only accounts for .001. I noticed for the Spec V, max downforce would put it about .002 faster and then it would lose that top end right before the finish line. But since indy is a bit shorter than SSRX, max downforce is what i use for that car at indy
 
seanneedscar
wrong, please try again

👍 to the bolded part

Most of the time min/max downforce only accounts for .001. I noticed for the Spec V, max downforce would put it about .002 faster and then it would lose that top end right before the finish line. But since indy is a bit shorter than SSRX, max downforce is what i use for that car at indy

0.001 isn't worth the embarrassment of a park bench spoiler tho
 

Latest Posts

Back