- 19,904

- Alabamamania
Actually, the Northeastern US uses passenger trains much more than the rest of the nation; mostly in the area from New York City to Washington D.C. use it for commuting. Some cities have their own municipal or area-wide rail transit (subways and elevated trains), or use the existing rail infrastructure for projects like [wikipedia]Tri-Rail[/wikipedia]...which after 20 years is finally at 50% capacity thanks to high gas prices, security-patrolled parking lots, and nicer facilities.I do wonder why you slackers up in the Northeast don't use trains that much, seeing that you're all bunched up into a small area.
But the rest of the nation primarily uses railways for freight; there's some things like Amtrak (which gets government bail-outs) that allow you to travel the nation by train, but the major lines are owned by three different companies, so that inhibits certain types of destinations; but it is not impossible to travel the US by rail.
We've had high-speed rail projects proposed in Florida since 1976. The troubles are:
No agreements on where the lines would go.
+ No agreements on where the trains would stop.
-----------------------------------------
= Massive eminent domain nightmare paid for by tax-payers.
I was really for it for years, and then the more research I've done, the more infuriated I am that hundreds of millions have already been wasted in wineing-and-dining other companies with nothing to show for over a 30-year period.