Automotive Food Chain

  • Thread starter Thread starter LP670-4 SV
  • 61 comments
  • 3,430 views

Where Are You In The Food Chain?

  • Just......(You probably take a bullet train anyway ;)

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Economy

    Votes: 9 11.4%
  • Economy +

    Votes: 28 35.4%
  • Sports Car

    Votes: 28 35.4%
  • Sports Car +

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • Super Car

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Hyper Car

    Votes: 5 6.3%

  • Total voters
    79
Some people are taking this thread a little too seriously.
 
Since I drive a Dodge Caravan, I am not really sure which one of these categories I fit in. Maybe Economy+?
 
Some people are taking this thread a little too seriously.

thank you! its not intended to be a statistically accurate power scale, just to see where one would fall in the performance category, its supposed to be taken lightly
 
According to 0-60 and top speed mine would be Sports car + (no idea what 1/4 is).
 
According to the 0-60 and top speed My car is a sports car!

Probably about right I guess for a "hot Hatch"
 
Economy+ with an Economy top speed.


Economy does not describe 15 very slow miles per gallon :lol:
 
Ok... who said hypercar?
 
I've put Sportscar.
Only cause the car I'm usually taken to school in is a Mercedes CLK-55 AMG (Grandad's).
 
I've put Sportscar.
Only cause the car I'm usually taken to school in is a Mercedes CLK-55 AMG (Grandad's).

That's further down the food chain.... "Don't have a car" is below "Just".
 
Sports Car +
0-60: 4-5 sec
1/4: 12 sec
Vmax: 170-185


My 69 Camaro fits the Sports Car+ category.
My 05 Subaru Impreza fits the sports car category.
 
I went for economy+

Never timed the 0 - 60 but did once reach a top speed of 225 km/h (139 mph)
 
What about quarter mile or 0-60, and not to mention maneuverability, even though thats not part of the criteria, and also you don't "drive" a space shuttle, and it cant qualify for hyper-CAR

Some people are taking this thread a little too seriously.

:lol:
 
You DESPERATELY need a 'What the 🤬?'' button in case anyone here owns a G-Wiz...
 
Sports car here, although really its a hot hatch.

Seat Ibiza Cupra 20VT 260+ BHP, 13.9s 1/4mile, 145 vmax, 0-60 5.X Seconds.

:D
 
R1ch85
Sports car here, although really its a hot hatch.

Seat Ibiza Cupra 20VT 260+ BHP, 13.9s 1/4mile, 145 vmax, 0-60 5.X Seconds.

:D

Nice, what mods are you running? How is the drivetrain holding up with the extra BHP?
 
:lol:

Kind of feeling you there... the last two "sports cars" I drove fall under "Economy +", while the last diesel luxury sedan I drove was a "Sports Car"... also an SUV and a seven-seater van... :D

---

Kinda pathetic to live your life by a meaningless set of numbers. Mine make more sense. I classify my cars by Lateral Gs. :lol:

1/4 mile, 0-60, and top speed are all meaningless, eh?

Not sure I would agree with the 0-60 times, sub 9 secs puts you in hot hatch/sports car territory to me, sub 7 puts you in very fast car.

A 6.9 0-60 hasn't been a "very fast car" since the early 90s.
 
GT5Junkie
A 6.9 0-60 hasn't been a "very fast car" since the early 90s.

It is round here! In the real world and on the open road anything sub 8 is very quick. Most cars are designed to do max mpg and comfort for the least money.

Besides, 0-60 is useless. 30-70 is a much better indicator of useful performance.
 
1/4 mile, 0-60, and top speed are all meaningless, eh?

Yeah... pretty ironic coming from someone who tests 0-100 km/h times for a living, eh? :lol:

But they are meaningless. Because there are trucks that can do the numbers faster than many sports cars, despite not being sporty enough to see off a decent "warm" hatch on a racetrack.
 
It's funny, those trucks could probably pull my car through the quarter mile faster than my car can itself. :lol:

I suppose I drive an economy and an economy+, works for me!
 
Five votes to Hyper Car and yet I still fail miserably to find pics of Veyrons in the member's rides section.

You don't understand, it's so quick, a mere 1/4000" shutter speed can't capture it. :dunce:

My Scion xD is apparently trying to break into the sports-car category, going by the data supplied by Car & Driver. Don't worry, I laughed first.
 
'Economy +' basically describes my car's entire existence, to be honest. Particularly as I tend not to think of it as 'the sportier' version so much as 'the more bearable' one.
 
Economy+ here too. 9.5 to 60mph, and 115mph-odd top end. And it even gets around 37mpg US, which over there would be enough to make it an actual economy car.

Incidentally, my old Miata which was actually a sports car, wouldn't be a sports car in this list.

And my 74 Beetle falls under "Just...", since it does 60 in 20-seconds plus and a little shy of 80mph max...
 
Sports car. Though in its current condition I dont drive it hard ever.
 
Economy plus.
Does it help any that my 86 subaru XT has a better coefficient of drag than a modern corvette, and gets 42 mpg on the highway?
 
My little Civic is econo, but I'm currently looking at a 300ZX that could put me in sports or sports+
 
My Mini has a 'Just...' 0-60 time (~20 seconds), but an 'Economy'/'Economy+' 1/4 time (20.5 seconds @ 62mph). Went with 'Just...' as I'm fairly certain it doesn't do 80. I've got no figures for the Land Rover yet, although if it's faster than the Mini I'll be amazed.
 
Back