BoP Update 30/5/18 Update 1.19

3,177
England
St helens, merseyside, England.
crazybuttocks198
Crazybuttocks19
The BoP (Balance of Performance) of the following cars has been adjusted:

Gr.1 Class
・Dodge SRT Tomahawk Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.1) [Power Ratio : 85% > 87%]
・Jaguar XJR-9 '88 [Power Ratio : 88%]
・McLaren Ultimate Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.1) [Power Ratio : 90% > 87%]
・Mercedes-Benz Sauber Mercedes C9 '89 [Power Ratio : 86%]
・Nissan R92CP '92 [Power Ratio : 87%]
・Peugeot L750R HYbrid Vision Gran Turismo, 2017 [Power Ratio : 96% > 88%]

Gr.3 Class
・Audi R8 LMS (Audi Sport Team WRT) '15 [Power Ratio : 91% > 92%]
・Honda NSX Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 96% > 97%]
・Mazda Atenza Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 104% > 105%]
・Mercedes-AMG GT3 (AMG-Team HTP-Motorsport) '16 [Power Ratio : 92% > 91%]
・Peugeot RCZ Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 105% > 106%]
・Porsche 911 RSR (991) '17 [Power Ratio : 104% > 103%]
・Toyota FT-1 Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.3) [Power Ratio : 101% > 100%]

Gr.4 Class
・Audi TT Cup '16 [Power Ratio : 101% > 102%]
・Lexus RC F Gr.4 [Power Ratio : 100% > 99%]
・Porsche Cayman GT4 Clubsport '16 [Power Ratio : 93% > 94%]
・Renault Sport Mégane Trophy '11 [Power Ratio : 87%] [Weight Reduction Ratio : 111%]
・Toyota 86 Gr.4 [Power Ratio : 99% > 98%]

IMPORTANT
The fuel consumption rate for the Gr.1 / Gr.3 / Gr.4 cars has been adjusted.

There you have it. Group C cars all given a detune in power.
 
Yes there is an Atenza GR3, I’m not sure is was under powered. I was on a 1.31.4 at Interlagos the other day in practice and I’m not an alien.
 
Oddly enough its VERY rwd... it and the road car are ones you can drift easily... down on power though given its only a turbo 2.5 four apparently.
 
Hmmm, wonder why they didn't touch the gr3 supra? I seem to see that at the top of the rankings on quite a few tracks at the moment.

Will be interesting to see what they have done to fuel consumption. It was fun to drive the Peugeot RCZ Gr3 at the Nurburgring 24h as you could get 2 laps with only a little fuel saving.
 
Gr.1 Class
・Dodge SRT Tomahawk Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.1) [Power Ratio : 85% > 87%]
・Jaguar XJR-9 '88 [Power Ratio : 88%]
・McLaren Ultimate Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.1) [Power Ratio : 90% > 87%]
・Mercedes-Benz Sauber Mercedes C9 '89 [Power Ratio : 86%]
・Nissan R92CP '92 [Power Ratio : 87%]
・Peugeot L750R HYbrid Vision Gran Turismo, 2017 [Power Ratio : 96% > 88%]

Gr.1 seems to be a total mess now! Vision cars, actual LMP cars and now Gr.C cars too? Oh god....:rolleyes:

Gr.3 Class
・Audi R8 LMS (Audi Sport Team WRT) '15 [Power Ratio : 91% > 92%] -> needed
・Honda NSX Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 96% > 97%] -> needed
・Mazda Atenza Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 104% > 105%] -> needed
・Mercedes-AMG GT3 (AMG-Team HTP-Motorsport) '16 [Power Ratio : 92% > 91%] -> what? Another nerf? Why PD?
・Peugeot RCZ Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 105% > 106%] -> acceptable
・Porsche 911 RSR (991) '17 [Power Ratio : 104% > 103%] -> that might killed the car for sport mode
・Toyota FT-1 Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.3) [Power Ratio : 101% > 100%] -> not really needed, but ok

I still wonder why the Huracan gets no love from PD!?

Gr.4 Class
・Audi TT Cup '16 [Power Ratio : 101% > 102%] -> why?
・Lexus RC F Gr.4 [Power Ratio : 100% > 99%]-> ok, but not needed
・Porsche Cayman GT4 Clubsport '16 [Power Ratio : 93% > 94%]-> needed, but shouldve been 95%
・Renault Sport Mégane Trophy '11 [Power Ratio : 87%] [Weight Reduction Ratio : 111%]-> I wonder if the megane scrubs all jump on this one :P
・Toyota 86 Gr.4 [Power Ratio : 99% > 98%]-> again, why? It was slow, but good in corners. PD logic -> lets nerf its power

I really wonder how Gr.1 will balance now. Atm there is no balance and I skip pretty much every race because its a Bugatti, Porsche or Mazda one-make...
 
Merc and RSR did not need and adjustment, RSR will be uncompetitive at the majority of tracks now, it was just over used at certain tracks. Not sure the Mazda needed adjustment, not sure it’s used enough to justify.

TT adjustment again :confused:, good to see cayman given some power. But I’m not sure it was as slow as people think. It’s just difficult to get the most out of it.
 
Gr.4 Class
・Renault Sport Mégane Trophy '11 [Power Ratio : 87%] [Weight Reduction Ratio : 111%]-> I wonder if the megane scrubs all jump on this one

Mate the new one is rwd, it may actually require a bit of skill to control, the scrubs will still be all about that FF4lyf
 
Gr.1 Class
・Dodge SRT Tomahawk Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.1) [Power Ratio : 85% > 87%]
・Jaguar XJR-9 '88 [Power Ratio : 88%]
・McLaren Ultimate Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.1) [Power Ratio : 90% > 87%]
・Mercedes-Benz Sauber Mercedes C9 '89 [Power Ratio : 86%]
・Nissan R92CP '92 [Power Ratio : 87%]
・Peugeot L750R HYbrid Vision Gran Turismo, 2017 [Power Ratio : 96% > 88%]

Gr.1 seems to be a total mess now! Vision cars, actual LMP cars and now Gr.C cars too? Oh god....:rolleyes:

Gr.3 Class
・Audi R8 LMS (Audi Sport Team WRT) '15 [Power Ratio : 91% > 92%] -> needed
・Honda NSX Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 96% > 97%] -> needed
・Mazda Atenza Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 104% > 105%] -> needed
・Mercedes-AMG GT3 (AMG-Team HTP-Motorsport) '16 [Power Ratio : 92% > 91%] -> what? Another nerf? Why PD?
・Peugeot RCZ Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 105% > 106%] -> acceptable
・Porsche 911 RSR (991) '17 [Power Ratio : 104% > 103%] -> that might killed the car for sport mode
・Toyota FT-1 Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.3) [Power Ratio : 101% > 100%] -> not really needed, but ok

I still wonder why the Huracan gets no love from PD!?

Gr.4 Class
・Audi TT Cup '16 [Power Ratio : 101% > 102%] -> why?
・Lexus RC F Gr.4 [Power Ratio : 100% > 99%]-> ok, but not needed
・Porsche Cayman GT4 Clubsport '16 [Power Ratio : 93% > 94%]-> needed, but shouldve been 95%
・Renault Sport Mégane Trophy '11 [Power Ratio : 87%] [Weight Reduction Ratio : 111%]-> I wonder if the megane scrubs all jump on this one :P
・Toyota 86 Gr.4 [Power Ratio : 99% > 98%]-> again, why? It was slow, but good in corners. PD logic -> lets nerf its power

I really wonder how Gr.1 will balance now. Atm there is no balance and I skip pretty much every race because its a Bugatti, Porsche or Mazda one-make...
Lol I am starting to think PD actually doesn't do sport mode races
 
Gr. 3 BoP was great lately. The only car that I have seen dominating the Top 10 on some tracks was the Supra.

The Mazda can be a bit of work on aging tires but is actually quite competitive. Just massively underused. Should be one of the stronger cars in Gr. 3 now.

Further nerfing the AMG was unnecessary. Even going from 93% to 92% was unnecessary. How does it compare to the SLS now?
 
Gr. 3 BoP was great lately. The only car that I have seen dominating the Top 10 on some tracks was the Supra.

The Mazda can be a bit of work on aging tires but is actually quite competitive. Just massively underused. Should be one of the stronger cars in Gr. 3 now.

The Atenza is a good compromise for almost every tracks but doesn't dominate one. But I'm agree with this boost :P
 
Mercedes-AMG GT3 (AMG-Team HTP-Motorsport) '16 [Power Ratio : 92% > 91%] -> what? Another nerf? Why PD?
Exactly my thought 🤬

Peugeot RCZ Gr.3 [Power Ratio : 105% > 106%] -> acceptable
Good :D I really enjoy driving this car :dopey:

Toyota FT-1 Vision Gran Turismo (Gr.3) [Power Ratio : 101% > 100%] -> not really needed, but ok
As needed as a nerf to the Supra imho

Toyota 86 Gr.4 [Power Ratio : 99% > 98%]-> again, why? It was slow, but good in corners. PD logic -> lets nerf its power
:banghead:
 
So Glad the Porsche got an adjustment, it might not be a one-make at Brands Hatch anymore.

Just wondering when they're gonna adjust the Supra now
 
The 911 was already lacking power. They should have added more weight instead

I really cant see why they just mess around with power. Weight is a lot more nuanced tool. Especially as i assume they are able to change weight balance also. I kind of miss GT5/6 pp system, as we were able to put 200hp 850kg isuzzu in a race with 480hp 1600kg Dodge. Now most of the cars have similar acceleration and grip. N-class without bop is the most useless. N300 X-Bow vs N300 Mach1 makes no sense.
 
Back