- 1,632
- UK
- YT__TJCGAMING
Your nation's cats are crud, but your birds are nice.
Good thing I own a dog then . 👍
My bird is tidy , so yep , I strongly agree.
Your nation's cats are crud, but your birds are nice.
My bird is tidy , so yep , I strongly agree.![]()
You have a parrot that cleans up after itself?
Both the ideas of "all British cars will fall apart because they were built improperly" and "British engineers are responsible for these great cars from x country" are contrived statements from the likes of Clarkson to make ignorant generalizations based on trends from the 1970's and promote national pride, respectively. Less so the second one (Brits are certainly known make great race cars), but it annoys me how the statement seems to ignore the significant amount of parts and expertise that tend to from the original country and just how common it is for companies to outsource and reuse.
This also goes for modern production cars. The V12's in Aston Martins are basically two Ford Duramax V6's welded together
homeforsummerThey all had plenty of input from elsewhere as you'd expect but they're all examples of supposedly "crappy" British engineering.
It's the concept of all British cars for some reason being rubbish that I object to, rather than someone preferring the cars of another country. There's nothing partisan about it and I'd be equally as irritated if someone came out and said "all American cars are crap".
That, and like anything else, the engine is only one aspect of a car. The Elise and Evora currently use Toyota engines, but it doesn't mean the rest of the car is badly developed.
With regards to Rolls and Bentley, they're undoubtedly excellent cars now, but then there's never been a point where that hasn't been the case anyway... and they managed to last for a hundred years or so before they were bought by German companies, so they must have been doing something right.
And still one of the best cars ever made in terms of ride quality, according to those in the know.
This thread is stupid, trolls will troll I guess.
2. I don't think ALL British caRs are rubbish, just the older ones made by 'bargain' manufacturers.
4. I only class manufacturers such as Bentley to be German, because they are ONWNED by the Germans.
5.I undersatnd that Italian cars aren't the first word in interior fit-and-finish, but they sure aren't built from (alot of) glue and plastic.
What do you have against glue and plastic? It's better than being built by a tractor manufacturer.
OWNED btw, not onwned...
'Bargain' manufacturers? Care to explain this foot in mouth comment?
Glue-and-plastic looks tacky, feels tacky and sounds tacky.
Bargain manufacturers, such as Austin, who built cheap cars for the general public.
You know carbon fibre is essentially glue and plastic right?![]()
If it works, and it does. What's the problem?
In what way are Fiat, makers of cheap cars for the general public, any different to Austin? Is the Fiat 500 a better car than the Austin Mini?
Your personal reasons are based in rubbish but it's your opinion, one question...why create this thread when you're obviously going to get an argument? Trollololololol
I can see you're just going to keep arguing with me, so...
I PERSONALLY dislike British Cars, for many PERSONAL reasons. Although, i do PERSONALLY like Italian (and german and Japanese) cars. I can't expalin why, it's just my PERSONAL feelings. So, before you reply, think about that; It doesn't matter how much you try to 'sell' the idea of british cars being good, i just don't like them. Reading back though, i feel like i should apologise to other members for the quote made in my first post. "British Cars Are Crap", i really shoudln't have said that, it is very opinionated and biased, so sorry.