Crooooooow and SVX's Gallery: Unexpected.

  • Thread starter Thread starter SVX
  • 308 comments
  • 35,967 views
Great FPV shots! The pixelly trees in the second shot make it more interesting than real trees Polyphony Digital still refuses to deny laziness to pull off realistic ones.

Sweet Lancer drift! đź‘Ť
 
Crooooooow
Great FPV shots! The pixelly trees in the second shot make it more interesting than real trees Polyphony Digital still refuses to deny laziness to pull off realistic ones.

Sweet Lancer drift! đź‘Ť
Click to expand...

Skython11
Amazing work SVX, love the use of the trees in the second one, and the colour in the first :drool: :drool: đź‘Ť :drool:
Click to expand...
Thanks for the compliment guys!

The pixelly trees in the second shot make it more interesting than real trees Polyphony Digital still refuses to deny laziness to pull off realistic ones.
Click to expand...
:lol:

Great FPV shots!
Click to expand...

It's a Holden mate, and your lucky you haven't had a Holden fanboy flame you. :p
 
Crooooooow, you're lucky I didn't eat you for that little mistake, :p. I don't flame :)
 
Great couple of shots. My favorite is the Evo drift one.
 
Thanks Fabmaru!
 
SVX
It's a Holden mate, and your lucky you haven't had a Holden fanboy flame you. :p
Click to expand...


It's like saying that Fords, Chevys and Chryslers are all the same :p

 
I'm back with more photos towards your way with a few hours left. Watch out!
 
Watch out here comes the Spider Man :D.
Good to see that you will do a new update. Does it include you?
 
fabmaru
Does it include you?
Click to expand...

This update does not include the Alfa Romeo 155 2.5 V6 TI Race Car 1993. But in the update after this one, yes.
 
The Valley Curve

img0005ho.jpg


img0004cax.jpg


img0003oq.jpg


img0002pl.jpg


img0001mkr.jpg


img0000x.jpg
 
Niec update, I like shots 1, 2 and 3. :drool: :drool: But the last one just looks wrong for some reason. :odd:
 
I don't know, it just seems wrong, maybe GT4's lighting system. It's nothing to do with your photography.
 
Skython11
I don't know, it just seems wrong, maybe GT4's lighting system. It's nothing to do with your photography.
Click to expand...

No, no no, yes, I think I do see what you mean. Is the the splattered watermarks on the clouds?
 
Nice update, Crooooooow! Quite abstract photos you've done there. My favorite is the third one, due to the cool color contrasting, angle and speed.
 
Good Update! My favorite is also the 3rd one. (It is not a great update because I don't like RUFs because if it were another car it would be a great update.)
 
SVX
Nice update, Crooooooow! Quite abstract photos you've done there. My favorite is the third one, due to the cool color contrasting, angle and speed.
Click to expand...
fabmaru
Good Update! My favorite is also the 3rd one. (It is not a great update because I don't like RUFs because if it were another car it would be a great update.)
Click to expand...

Thanks guys! I knew I should have entered the third photo in Week 87 of the GT4 Photomode Competition.
 
Crooooooow
No, no no, yes, I think I do see what you mean. Is the the splattered watermarks on the clouds?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I think it's the sky/ground textures
 
Lets go truckin'!







Here you go, Crooooooow!*



C&C is welcome.




Thanks for looking! :cheers:​





















Look! I rhymed!​
 
Last edited:
Finally he takes my requests. :sly: Great pack. I like how all of the trucks in the first shot have different focuses.
 
Thanks, Crooooooow!
 
Great photos! I usually don't like those trucks but you made them look good. đź‘Ť But I think they don't give a lot a advantage in the training for the FLS. The Subaru handles slightly better. :)
 
fabmaru
Great photos! I usually don't like those trucks but you made them look good. đź‘Ť But I think they don't give a lot a advantage in the training for the FLS. The Subaru handles slightly better. :)
Click to expand...

Thanks, fabmaru! But...slightly?! That big 'ol hunk of steel had a turning circle of a bus!
 
Do you understand the concept of sarcasm?
 
Yes. Sorry about that.
 
Back