Do women succeed in GT7?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lightpilgrim
  • 93 comments
  • 8,564 views
Use ChatGPT or Grok to educate yourself if that conflicts with your worldview.

I wouldn't suggest AI results for anything more important than "did my fart sound like a plastic kazoo or a rapidly-descending dirigible"?

Of course women and anyone on the gender spectrum can play silly video games; conflating low sample percentages with how good someone would be at a racing game has no correlation. But also consider that not everyone wants to reveal who they are online, especially to spend less time fending off chit-chat and prioritizing actually playing games.
 
Last edited:
Why take my word for it when you could take the word of an actual female race car driver:



I don’t think many of you actually understand the real forces that are put on your body in an F1 car. Sustained 6g lateral forces, every lap, on high speed turns. 5g’s in braking zones, every lap. 2-3g’s of accelerating force… out of every turn… lap, after lap, after lap. I could pretty much guarantee that every single person on this forum wouldn’t be able to handle the forces a F1 car puts on them for a full 90 minute race, let alone 10 minutes.

You may look at the male drivers and think, “oh damn, that guy is scrawny as hell. I could kick his ass.” You have no comprehension of the physical demands his body has to go through during an F1 race. You may look at someone like Louis Hamilton and think, “he’s not that big”. Take a guess at what his neck size is. You’re wrong. It’s 18 ****ing inches! It’s that big because the G-forces he experiences in the car are trying to rip his damn head off.

Now, y’all seem to think that women can do anything a man can do. I don’t dispute that. If you want to talk extremes, both men and women have summited Everest. Both men and women have gone in to space. Both men and women have swam the English Channel. These are all incredible feats of strength and endurance. Something I will never do. I tip my hat to all of them. But we are talking about F1. The absolute peak of racing. I made the tennis analogy with Serena Williams because it was the greatest female tennis player of all time recognizing the fact that she would get destroyed by a fairly good, but not the best, male competitor. Best female tennis player ever vs. a very good male tennis player getting destroyed. Her words, not mine.

Im not here to downplay women. I think women are pretty damn awesome, but there are only 20 positions available for the entirety of THE WORLD to get a seat in F1. Considering F1 costs an insane amount of money just to show up every week, if you aren’t winning you are losing. Not just losing races, but losing sponsorships and revenue to keep your team going. You need to be, quite literally, “the best in the world” to be on an F1 team. The best of over 8 billion people in the world. Even a marginal underperformance could get you kicked off a team because I guarantee there are hundreds of other people who are itching to take your spot.

Would I like to see a woman in F1? I guess. Honestly, it has no impact on my life, but sure why not. Will she be up to the task and perform as well as the men and be competitive? Based on the statistics, it’s not looking good. There have only been 5 women in all of F1’s history and only one of them ever scored points in a race. The last woman in F1 was in 1992. She didn’t qualify for any of the races. F1 doesn’t discriminate against women being in the sport. Women can be in F1 if they can perform. But teams need drivers who can perform.

I don’t have an issue with a man and women directly competing against each other, but the question was weather a woman could be competitive against a man in F1. This, of course, assumes that both drivers are at the peak of performance in their field. Much like Serena Williams was at the peak of performance in her field. To that, my answer is no and it simply has to do with the physicality and endurance required by the car in a race.
 
Last edited:
Why take my word for it when you could take the word of an actual female race car driver:


And yet they have, and that clip forgets a couple of key points.

F3 and F2 cars don't have power steering, F1 cars do.
Indy Cars don't have power steering, are close to the same level of g, and has had numerous women actively compete in it (but this point has already been raised twice, and ignored by you twice).

I don’t think many of you actually understand the real forces that are put on your body in an F1 car. Sustained 6g lateral forces, every lap, on high speed turns. 5g’s in braking zones, every lap. 2-3g’s of accelerating force… out of every turn… lap, after lap, after lap. I could pretty much guarantee that every single person on this forum wouldn’t be able to handle the forces a F1 car puts on them for a full 90 minute race, let alone 10 minutes.
I've driven Formula cars, so yes I understand.
Not to mention that the above requires fitness and endurance, not raw strength.

You may look at the male drivers and think, “oh damn, that guy is scrawny as hell. I could kick his ass.” You have no comprehension of the physical demands his body has to go through during an F1 race. You may look at someone like Louis Hamilton and think, “he’s not that big”. Take a guess at what his neck size is. You’re wrong. It’s 18 ****ing inches! It’s that big because the G-forces he experiences in the car are trying to rip his damn head off.
Look it's a strawman argument.

Now, y’all seem to think that women can do anything a man can do. I don’t dispute that. If you want to talk extremes, both men and women have summited Everest. Both men and women have gone in to space. Both men and women have swam the English Channel. These are all incredible feats of strength and endurance. Something I will never do. I tip my hat to all of them.
And yet...

But we are talking about F1. The absolute peak of racing.
That's a separate and debatable point.

I made the tennis analogy with Serena Williams because it was the greatest female tennis player of all time recognizing the fact that she would get destroyed by a fairly good, but not the best, male competitor. Best female tennis player ever vs. a very good male tennis player getting destroyed. Her words, not mine.
Guess you missed the news flash.

Im not here to downplay women. I think women are pretty damn awesome, but there are only 20 positions available for the entirety of THE WORLD to get a seat in F1. Considering F1 costs an insane amount of money just to show up every week, if you aren’t winning you are losing. Not just losing races, but losing sponsorships and revenue to keep your team going. You need to be, quite literally, “the best in the world” to be on an F1 team. The best of over 8 billion people in the world. Even a marginal underperformance could get you kicked off a team because I guarantee there are hundreds of other people who are itching to take your spot.
The existence of pay drivers in F1 utterly dispels that.

Are you claiming that no one in a lower formula is on a par with Stroll? Or that at the time, Mazipin was one of the best 20 formula drivers on the planet?

Your point holds true for the top 3 teams; in the other 14 slots, money is a much more important factor.

Would I like to see a woman in F1? I guess. Honestly, it has no impact on my life, but sure why not. Will she be up to the task and perform as well as the men and be competitive? Based on the statistics, it’s not looking good. There have only been 5 women in all of F1’s history and only one of them ever scored points in a race.
Now go back and rescore them with a modern points system.

The last woman in F1 was in 1992.
Nope.

She didn’t qualify for any of the races.
And Damon Hill failed to qualify in 6 out of 8 races when he replaced her in the same car.

Odd that you missed that context.

F1 doesn’t discriminate against women being in the sport. Women can be in F1 if they can perform. But teams need drivers who can perform.
They need money more, particularly outside the top teams.

That aside, the programmes they have put in place to address the imbalance show that they are very well aware that discrimination exists, and are working to change that (which implies they are aware the sport and some of the audience still does dsiscriminate).

I don’t have an issue with a man and women directly competing against each other, but the question was weather a woman could be competitive against a man in F1. This, of course, assumes that both drivers are at the peak of performance in their field. Much like Serena Williams was at the peak of performance in her field. To that, my answer is no and it simply has to do with the physicality and endurance required by the car in a race.
And yet you fail to address the participants of similar forms of motorsport in terms of physical requirements and fall back to handwaving, strawman arguments, and avoiding addressing actual comparisons..
 
Last edited:
The thread went a bit away from "... in GT7" but it is interesting. Having no firm ideas about the reasons why we don't see women in F1 for example, I learn a lot of things.
 
Last edited:
You need to be, quite literally, “the best in the world” to be on an F1 team
high quality GIF
 
This whole thread is a bunch of vaporwave, I don't think the real problem here is if women can or can't physically endure racing but more so the fact that they don't want to. Some do, pursue it, and succeed at it, be it in real life or virtually - but ultimately you don't see many women racing just because of lack of interest in the hobby/sport, it really isn't deeper than this.
 
It’s a pyramid… the best drivers are at the peak. But if the pool of drivers working there way into the sport is small (i.e. women) then it will get smaller and smaller as the quality increases - irregardless of the quality of the individual. If the split at the bottom was 50/50 we’d have a lot more females closer to the top.

If Suzie Wolf was quicker (or a huge sponsor) - I’d have no doubts she could participate quite comfortably in a Grand Prix.

I still find it surprising GT7 does not allow you to chose the gender or even ethnicity of your in game avatar. That seems very backwards for a game of this quality.
 
This whole thread is a bunch of vaporwave, I don't think the real problem here is if women can or can't physically endure racing but more so the fact that they don't want to. Some do, pursue it, and succeed at it, be it in real life or virtually - but ultimately you don't see many women racing just because of lack of interest in the hobby/sport, it really isn't deeper than this.
So close to getting the point, so close...
 
In gaming everyone is equal and there should be no judgement.

In the real world inequalities are rife and the extend way way beyond the gender divide.

To the pertinent point of the thread I know specifically 3 women who place consistently in the daily race TTs with top 500 or top 1000.

What should be done is asking women to participate in a thread that is discussing their relative performance, motivation and challenges.

The rest is all just normal forum fighting and drivel.
 
Maybe it's because is irrelevant for a game, both ethnicity and gender. It may prevent further divide.
It is irrelevant for the input to the game - but if you’re not a white man then it’s not great for the immersion or inclusion. Especially when the cars are represented to the nth degree and there are women in the game!

When I play, I don’t consider myself playing a character. That’s me in the game. Maybe my wife would play more other than her “so I have to be a white man to drive” response.
 
It is irrelevant for the input to the game - but if you’re not a white man then it’s not great for the immersion or inclusion. Especially when the cars are represented to the nth degree and there are women in the game!

When I play, I don’t consider myself playing a character. That’s me in the game. Maybe my wife would play more other than her “so I have to be a white man to drive” response.
This just sounds like HR fluff. E_Spori was spot on at first and that’s that.
 
This just sounds like HR fluff. E_Spori was spot on at first and that’s that.
Nah, my girlfriend plays racing games as well as I do, and thinks it's a bit lame GT7 just has you as "Dude" and nothing else. It's just nice to let a player express themselves as themselves. Even if that's something as simple as two body options (like Forza Motorsport has it).
 
Nah, my girlfriend plays racing games as well as I do, and thinks it's a bit lame GT7 just has you as "Dude" and nothing else. It's just nice to let a player express themselves as themselves. Even if that's something as simple as two body options (like Forza Motorsport has it).
Still can't see why PD don't have that option.
 
Still can't see why PD don't have that option.
I do understand a little, PD doesn’t overly engender the game. So we get mannequins and in brutal honesty we see them briefly at the end of a race if you are watching.

Most people look the same in a race suit so it’s hardly a hill I would die on.

the reason it doesn’t exist is there is no realistic place avatars are important enough or seen enough. Honestly it’s that simple.
 
Still can't see why PD don't have that option.
Might conflict with the suit livery editor if you can either be a shawty with massive baps, or Steven Crouch's taller brother (and potentially have the typical physique of anyone from 7 to 77).. but in any case, given how seldom the majority of players actually see their 'person', it's probably a lot of effort for little reward.
 
Last edited:
Unless you use it in scapes… still minor detail and I can understand why they don’t care. But I can also see why other thinks it’s another straw for the camel’s back
 
Unless you use it in scapes… still minor detail and I can understand why they don’t care. But I can also see why other thinks it’s another straw for the camel’s back
That's a point that I guess PD(more like Kaz) does push with the constant Scapes updates. Though I guess PD have the data that may show many players don't include the avatar in photos.
 
That's a point that I guess PD(more like Kaz) does push with the constant Scapes updates. Though I guess PD have the data that may show many players don't include the avatar in photos.
You over rate Kaz’s day to day influence and that enough people take photos let alone worry about the gender of avatar.

Kaz is the MD/Chairman he tries various builds and will drive certain directions creatively.

But under Kaz is the creative director, the chief technical officer, the lead or principal designers and programmers, gameplay or level designers, terrain or model designers, principals and leads. AI and Sophy teams. Then there is the are the PMs and sound/audio engineers, the QA and localisation peeps then the lawyers. But having teams this big means you need a HR and payroll function, probably a complex finance and accounting function as well, you’ll probably want to or need to hire people as back fill or forward planning so you’ll need a talent acquisition function, but with the size of the game you will need community (agency management) but the live events need some practical marketing support so you have a marketing department.

And then you realise the guy at the top does a few town hall speeches and everyone else does the work. Kaz gives zero care to the races, the shape of the avatars or the sound of the engines. He has in put or opinions but that’s it unless he wants to do it all himself PD works like every other business.

The gender of the avatars wasn’t even on the radar or important and certainly not something Kaz would mention 🤣
 
You over rate Kaz’s day to day influence and that enough people take photos let alone worry about the gender of avatar.

Kaz is the MD/Chairman he tries various builds and will drive certain directions creatively.

But under Kaz is the creative director, the chief technical officer, the lead or principal designers and programmers, gameplay or level designers, terrain or model designers, principals and leads. AI and Sophy teams. Then there is the are the PMs and sound/audio engineers, the QA and localisation peeps then the lawyers. But having teams this big means you need a HR and payroll function, probably a complex finance and accounting function as well, you’ll probably want to or need to hire people as back fill or forward planning so you’ll need a talent acquisition function, but with the size of the game you will need community (agency management) but the live events need some practical marketing support so you have a marketing department.

And then you realise the guy at the top does a few town hall speeches and everyone else does the work. Kaz gives zero care to the races, the shape of the avatars or the sound of the engines. He has in put or opinions but that’s it unless he wants to do it all himself PD works like every other business.

The gender of the avatars wasn’t even on the radar or important and certainly not something Kaz would mention 🤣
How am I overeating Kaz' love of photography? :lol:

It's not a deep thought. I'm not too concerned to search the trickle all the way to who pays for the team's lunches. I'm not in the boardroom when who knows who is the one to suggest sending a crew to photograph in any of the thousand of spots we're able to photograph.
We know PD collect data. I'm sure they have numbers for pretty much everything. They read through this forum. I'm sure they've come across discussions about avatar gender. If nothing comes of it I'm definitely not losing sleep over. Just a thought of 'cant'. Which opinions have been given. Coo.
 
Nope. And it's not a chauvinistic thing to say. The level of G-forces put on to an F1 driver's body, the level of upper body strength to physically hold the wheel at high downforce and high g-force turns requires elite levels of physical strength and endurance. Now, women should be able to beat out men in weight and lower body strength (which is a great advantage), but if the upper body strength can't hold the wheel and steer the car going full tilt through the entirety of the race, their pace will have to slow down so they don't crash. I do believe, however, that women could perform well for a period of time against men in an F1 race. A woman could likely set a fastest lap, but the physicality of driving an F1 vehicle over a 90-minute race will begin to show in their lap times as they begin to slow down from fatigue.

There was a big flare up when John McEnroe said that Serena Williams couldn't compete in men's tennis. People all got pissed off because they thought he was against women or somehow putting her down. Serena had this to say about how she would perform playing against a man:


There are plenty of sports where women can compete against men and be not only competitive, but flat out better than men. But for sports that demand great physical strength and endurance to perform at the most elite level, men perform better. It's not sexism. It's not about being chauvinistic. It's just biology.

You don't seem to remember that power steering and power brakes are a thing and have been for years.
 
You don't seem to remember that power steering and power brakes are a thing and have been for years.
I’ve already stated this, but 5-6g of force on the body, turn after turn, lap after lap causes fatigue. And it’s not like having women driving the cars will make those G forces any less. Every driver drives very similar equipment on the same track, in the same track conditions and they all need to go around the track in very similar times (if they intend to be competitive) making the speeds in the turns and the braking zones all very similar. So G forces of 5-6g will be experienced by all drivers.

I didn’t say women couldn’t drive an F1 car. In fact, I said I think women could be competitive for a period of time, even perhaps setting a fastest lap over the men. But the question wasn’t, “could women drive an F1 car?” The question posed was, “can women be competitive in F1?” To that I said no because the g forces and physical strength and endurance to drive the cars at full tilt for 90 minutes naturally benefits those with greater upper body strength to withstand the full duration of the race. Pound for pound, men naturally have greater upper body strength than women. This puts men in a natural advantage over women. Women naturally have greater lower body strength than men (pound for pound). That benefits women in the braking zones, but if you can’t lift your arms on lap 15 to turn the wheel because they suddenly weigh 150 lbs each going through Copse Corner (Solverstone) at 185mph, you are going to end up in a wall if you don’t slow down. No amount of power steering is going to help you lift your arms through a 5g turn. That’s all on you, corner after corner, lap after lap for ~90 minutes.

BTW, the lateral g forces through Copse Corner are about 5.5g. So your head and helmet weigh 60+lbs going through that turn. And that’s just one turn in the lap. There are 18 turns in every lap. And there are 52 laps in that one race.
 
Last edited:
I’ve already stated this, but 5-6g of force on the body, turn after turn, lap after lap causes fatigue. And it’s not like having women driving the cars will make those G forces any less. Every driver drives very similar equipment on the same track, in the same track conditions and they all need to go around the track in very similar times (if they intend to be competitive) making the speeds in the turns and the braking zones all very similar. So G forces of 5-6g will be experienced by all drivers.

I didn’t say women couldn’t drive an F1 car. In fact, I said I think women could be competitive for a period of time, even perhaps setting a fastest lap over the men. But the question wasn’t, “could women drive an F1 car?” The question posed was, “can women be competitive in F1?” To that I said no because the g forces and physical strength and endurance to drive the cars at full tilt for 90 minutes naturally benefits those with greater upper body strength to withstand the full duration of the race. Pound for pound, men naturally have greater upper body strength than women. This puts men in a natural advantage over women. Women naturally have greater lower body strength than men (pound for pound). That benefits women in the braking zones, but if you can’t lift your arms on lap 15 to turn the wheel because they suddenly weigh 150 lbs each going through Copse Corner (Solverstone) at 185mph, you are going to end up in a wall if you don’t slow down. No amount of power steering is going to help you lift your arms through a 5g turn. That’s all on you, corner after corner, lap after lap for ~90 minutes.
Wolff explains: “When people ask me ‘well, can a woman drive a Formula 1 car?’ – I drove it and I did a race distance here in Barcelona, 78 laps. So, anyone that says that a woman isn't physically capable, I've done it. I know that we’re physically capable and I know what the journey is every step of the way.

“Would I love to see a woman racing in Formula 1? Of course I would – and I'm not a very patient person on the best of days! So, it can't happen soon enough, but change takes time. By increasing the talent pool that's out there racing, I'm pretty sure that we'll see a woman in Formula 1. I can't tell you exactly when, but I hope ASAP.

“I'm at the beginning of my journey with F1 ACADEMY. I'm incredibly ambitious and we've got a lot of things coming, so please watch this space.”

 
Or we can just look at the results of all the competitions. 🤷‍♂️

And talk about the results not weather they are women.

The things that hold women back is men talking about it.

Really annoying, a whole bunch of you or middle age men, you should no better or just be better :/

My 11 year old daughter looked at this thread and said “nah, this isn’t right”

I agree with her.

All of this feels weird poison. Especially when the Op knows so little about racing and people who race.

Another reason to leave here
Bye and good ridens.
 
Wolff explains: “When people ask me ‘well, can a woman drive a Formula 1 car?’ – I drove it and I did a race distance here in Barcelona, 78 laps. So, anyone that says that a woman isn't physically capable, I've done it. I know that we’re physically capable and I know what the journey is every step of the way.

“Would I love to see a woman racing in Formula 1? Of course I would – and I'm not a very patient person on the best of days! So, it can't happen soon enough, but change takes time. By increasing the talent pool that's out there racing, I'm pretty sure that we'll see a woman in Formula 1. I can't tell you exactly when, but I hope ASAP.

“I'm at the beginning of my journey with F1 ACADEMY. I'm incredibly ambitious and we've got a lot of things coming, so please watch this space.”

Unfortunately, he's allergic to contrary evidence from women & people in the sport who did exactly what he said they can't do, hence why he won't respond to Scaff or anyone else.
 

Wolff explains: “When people ask me ‘well, can a woman drive a Formula 1 car?’ – I drove it and I did a race distance here in Barcelona, 78 laps. So, anyone that says that a woman isn't physically capable, I've done it. I know that we’re physically capable and I know what the journey is every step of the way.

“Would I love to see a woman racing in Formula 1? Of course I would – and I'm not a very patient person on the best of days! So, it can't happen soon enough, but change takes time. By increasing the talent pool that's out there racing, I'm pretty sure that we'll see a woman in Formula 1. I can't tell you exactly when, but I hope ASAP.

“I'm at the beginning of my journey with F1 ACADEMY. I'm incredibly ambitious and we've got a lot of things coming, so please watch this space.”

Great story. So she drove 11 laps on Silverstone. Anyone know what her lap times looked like? How were they relative to the remainder of the field? Was it competitive with the men? How well did she perform on lap 30? Was she still keeping a competitive pace? I guess we will never know as she only did 11. Not quite 1/4 the length of an F1 race on that track.

Again, guys and gals, this isn’t about weather women can drive the car. I have fully acknowledged that women can drive F1 cars and may in fact be competitive with men for a period of time. However, this was not a race. It wasn’t a full length race test. It was free practice, which I suppose is the best you can get without actually racing. Unfortunately, it was less than 1/4 the length of an actual race.

Oh, she ran 78 laps at Barcelona. Cool. What were her lap times? Were they competitive with the men? Any ideas on total time to complete the 78 laps? How was that relative to the field?

Maybe there is a fundamental difference in what I believe the word competitive means vs what you all think. If you are being lapped by the field, I don’t believe that makes you competitive. You are traffic. If you have no chance at getting any points during the season, always placing in the bottom 3 or 4, I don’t think you are all that competitive and your seat will likely be taken by someone who can get some points on the board for the team.

The F1 Academy thing sounds like a cool program, but they don’t drive F1 cars in the F1 Academy. They drive F4 cars. According to Google, F4 cars hit peak lateral G’s of 2.0. That’s a far cry from 5-6 lateral G’s in an F1 car. It’s great that this is a door that the women are able to walk through to get them the seat time in these types of cars, but if a woman was going to be in F1, don’t you think we would have seen more than what we have? We have… 6 examples over all the years. Only one woman since 1992 has driven an F1 car in a somewhat race like scenario. This article doesn’t state what her lap times were. It doesn’t state what her times were like relative to the male field. That baffles me why they wouldn’t mention this in an article where they are trying to show that women can perform as well as the men.
 
Last edited:
Great story. So she drove 11 laps on Silverstone. Anyone know what her lap times looked like? How were they relative to the remainder of the field? Was it competitive with the men? How well did she perform on lap 30? Was she still keeping a competitive pace? I guess we will never know as she only did 11. Not quite 1/4 the length of an F1 race on that track.

Again, guys and gals, this isn’t about weather women can drive the car. I have fully acknowledged that women can drive F1 cars and may in fact be competitive with men for a period of time. However, this was not a race. It wasn’t a full length race test. It was free practice, which I suppose is the best you can get without actually racing. Unfortunately, it was less than 1/4 the length of an actual race.

Oh, she ran 78 laps at Barcelona. Cool. What were her lap times? Were they competitive with the men? Any ideas on total time to complete the 78 laps? How was that relative to the field?

Maybe there is a fundamental difference in what I believe the word competitive means vs what you all think. If you are being lapped by the field, I don’t believe that makes you competitive. You are traffic. If you have no chance at getting any points during the season, always placing in the bottom 3 or 4, I don’t think you are all that competitive and your seat will likely be taken by someone who can get some points on the board for the team.

The F1 Academy thing sounds like a cool program, but they don’t drive F1 cars in the F1 Academy. They drive F4 cars. According to Google, F4 cars hit peak lateral G’s of 2.0. That’s a far cry from 5-6 lateral G’s in an F1 car. It’s great that this is a door that the women are able to walk through to get them the seat time in these types of cars, but if a woman was going to be in F1, don’t you think we would have seen more than what we have? We have… 6 examples over all the years. Only one woman since 1992 has driven an F1 car in a somewhat race like scenario. This article doesn’t state what her lap times were. It doesn’t state what her times were like relative to the male field. That baffles me why they wouldn’t mention this in an article where they are trying to show that women can perform as well as the men.
Learn to read buddy…

She’s done several full race distances. Hot, cold, she’s done it.

Women have done the Indy500 - same Gs and twice the distance of a GP.

Women can do it - physicality is not the problem. Her times against Massa ranged from 0.2 off to 0.8 so she was a lot more competitive than some team mates in F1 this season.
 
Last edited:
Hey everyone, I have a curious question about women in Gran Turismo 7. It seems like the community—and the game itself—is very male-dominated. Judging by the nicknames on leaderboards, it’s hard to tell who’s who, but I often assume most of them are men. Personally, I’ve never interacted with a woman in sim racing or in Gran Turismo specifically.

It made me wonder if this reflects real life in motorsport, where there are very few females competing on equal terms with men. Just to be clear, this isn’t about superiority or inferiority—I’m genuinely curious. Maybe it’s historical, or perhaps just the nature of things, where men have traditionally been more passionate about cars, which is why the sim racing scene feels so male-oriented.

That said, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Do you see more women starting to get involved and succeed in Gran Turismo? Is there a shift happening, or is it still largely a male space?

Just curious to hear your perspectives—thanks!
Just going to speak on the bolded part. GT racing is where we can see the growing number of women competing on equal terms with men. One hour races to 24 hours races where it requires, for the most part, driver changes. There have been plenty women winning races in GT3 and GT4 in equal machinery.

I'm seeing more women, just like men, joining GT racing which fits a good budget to go racing for a season. Either full on woman only teams like Iron Dames/Iron Lynx winning races in Europe or young women drivers like Zoe Woods(got her first win recently at Sydney Motorsport Park, with teammate Nash Morris) and Summer Rintoule(she's 18yo, first time racing GT4 and finished second at Sydney Motorsport Park with her teammate Jarrod Hughes). They're both quick holding their own with their male peers.
 
Great story. So she drove 11 laps on Silverstone. Anyone know what her lap times looked like? How were they relative to the remainder of the field? Was it competitive with the men? How well did she perform on lap 30? Was she still keeping a competitive pace? I guess we will never know as she only did 11. Not quite 1/4 the length of an F1 race on that track.
First off, her GP debut at Silverstone was only 4 laps because of mechanical failure. Her 11 laps was on old & new tires, so she did 22 laps which was at Hockenheim, which is where her full debut was. It's amusing to try and dunk on her for only competing "11 laps" on a Free Practice session where A) lap times really aren't indicative at all & B) drivers compete a wide variety of lap distances. Since you asked:
10th: Sutil - 1:20.505 - 18 laps
11th: Massa - 1:20.542 - 19 laps
12th: Vergne - 1:20.586 - 23 laps
13th: Hulkenberg - 1:20.592 - 22 laps
14th: Perez - 1:20.598 - 24 laps
15th: Wolff - 1:20.769 - 22 laps
16th: Garde - 1:20.782 - 23 laps
17th: Grosjean - 1:21.603 - 20 laps
18th: Maldonado - 1:21.854 - 20 laps
19th: Kobayashi - 1:22.572 - 31 laps
20th: Bianchi - 1:22.982 - 24 laps
21st: Ericsson - 1:23.256 - 35 laps
22nd: Chilton - 1:23.299 - 22 laps

Oh, she ran 78 laps at Barcelona. Cool. What were her lap times? Were they competitive with the men? Any ideas on total time to complete the 78 laps? How was that relative to the field?
Ah, so first we try to mock Susie for only completing 11 laps in a session that was actually 22 laps in free practice & then tried to use that as indicative that we'll "never know" how she did against the men when she actually did a similar number of laps as them & had a lap time with some rather well known names around her.

And now that you learned she did a full length run, you're still trying to take the piss out her.

I don't know when she completed the 78 laps at Barcelona, but she did complete 55 laps at Barcelona during a test day in 2014.
1.Pastor MaldonadoLotus F1 Team1m24.871s-102
2.Nico RosbergMercedes AMG F11m25.805s+0.934s102
3.Kimi RaikkonenFerrari1m26.480s+1.609s93
4.Esteban GutierrezSauber F1 Team1m26.972s+2.101s84
5.Susie WolffWilliams F11m27.280s+2.409s55
6.Jules BianchiMarussia1m27.718s+2.847s55
7.Sebastian VettelRed Bull Racing1m27.973s+3.102s72
8.Daniel JuncadellaSahara Force India1m28.278s+3.407s91
9.Stoffel VandoorneMcLaren1m28.441s+3.570s135
10.Daniil KvyatToro Rosso1m28.910s+4.039s21

Here's another 78 lap test day (which is where I believe the 78 laps actually comes from) in 2013 at Silverstone.
1. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1m32.894s
2. Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes 1m33.242s
3. Nicolas Prost Lotus-Renault 1m33.256s
4. Carlos Sainz Jr Red Bull-Renault 1m33.546s
5. Davide Rigon Ferrari 1m33.592s
6. Felipe Massa Ferrari 1m33.624s
7. Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1m33.647s
8. Gary Paffett McLaren-Mercedes 1m34.294s
9. Susie Wolff Williams-Renault 1m35.093s
10. Giedo van der Garde Caterham-Renault 1m35.155s
11. Daniil Kvyat Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1m35.281s
12. Charles Pic Caterham-Renault 1m35.576s
13. Kimiya Sato Sauber-Ferrari 1m35.642s
14. Rodolfo Gonzalez Marussia-Cosworth 1m36.339s
15. James Calado Force India-Mercedes 1m36.451s
16. Jules Bianchi Marussia-Cosworth 1m36.744s

Holy ****, Vettel went from top of the chart to behind Susie the next year. Washed before we ever knew it. /s

Maybe it's best you just dip out from the thread. You came in here talking like you had real knowledge of what it takes to be in F1 and basically sizzled it down to, "Women can't do it b/c they can't handle the g-forces", and that's been disproven multiple time already. Just ignorant post after ignorant post, real clown behavior.
 
Last edited:
Back