well every neon has its day,Originally posted by neon_duke
Care to bet? I know somebody who uses their Neon for courier service making medical deliveries. That Neon has about 350,000 miles on it at last count. Original engine. Several clutches, yes, but original engine. There are some known over 200,000 miles and many well over 100,000.
Unless I get tired of it there is nothing preventing my Neon running 200,000 miles, just like my old Supra, and just like my Civic before that. FWIW I have a '67 Pontiac in my garage that just rolled over 270,000 miles.
Consumer Reports (Retards) be damned, the Neon is just not made of tin like people think it is. I have nothing against Japanese cars. I just do not think they are the only choice available.
Originally posted by VetteFerrViper
ok, on a reply dated 7 27 some sed that in the fast and furious they saw no neons and only honda civics saying thats y they were better. This doesnt mean that the neon is worse bc in that movie dunt forget theres over 20 grand under the hood... u can do that with any car. i hate all hondas except for the NSX but i wouldnt want no neon ether... all im saying is i wuld probably take the neon over the honda civic. Only because a car is in a movie, it doesnt mean its better than a car not in a movie. to be honest with you american cars are the best![]()
Neon - totally stock, base engine = 130 ft-lb torque.Originally posted by j2s
ok....Honda without VTEC = 90-100 ft-lb.
Honda with VTEC = 110-125 ft-lb.
One thing you need to undertand - the Avenger is a reskinned Mitsubishi Eclipse, nothing more, nothing less. I don't qualify that as an American car, or even a Mopar, despite the name plate.VetteFerrViper--
"American cars being the best-"
i had an '88 civic with more torque STOCK than a '99 dodge avenger.