lol another pointless thread.
Good job on catching him though I guess.
This forum is full of them, I think the title explains enough for you to make an educated decision whether to view or not!
Bit of a pointless thread really if you aren't going to tell us who the guy is so we can avoid him.
I find the most trustworthy traders are in fact dupers![]()
Bit of a pointless thread really if you aren't going to tell us who the guy is so we can avoid him.
I find the most trustworthy traders are in fact dupers![]()
Someone paid 50 bucks for something that doesn't exist?It's funny what people will do for digital cars. The $50 X2010 was the funniest yet.
my 3 gold chips for a mark iv. its posted at top.
$50 you missed the big ones then $160 for a f gt. $210 for a x1. $55 for a tricked out enzo LOL
Bit of a pointless thread really if you aren't going to tell us who the guy is so we can avoid him.
I find the most trustworthy traders are in fact dupers![]()
I've sorta scammed someone by accident, they sent me a car late because they weren't online at the reset. I was online and ready to send at the reset...
By the time they sent the car I had already gone away for a week, now because of the 1.07 patch I can't send the car they asked for and I'm going to have to send them a different car when I'm back home =[
I'm just praying for them to undo the 1million limit so I can send the car this guy asked for =[
Technically, TECHNICALLY, you gifted the item, and as such, can't expect anything in return.
Lol WTF?? Try that theory in the market place. Guess this is why we have 1.07 because people were not giddily they were trading. Then again itight be because people were selling om eBay and the likes who knows.
A "handshake" deal is a deal man.
Good work Dago. However and I hate to say this because I have also Bren scammed but be carefull what you post dude. Read up on the traders reputation thread. You could land yourself a warning if not carefull. Hey man I disagree with the rules and wiuld love to name my scammer but I have already had a warning for doing it.
All the same though, cheers for the link ;-)