- 606
- Toronto, Canada
- slicecom
Fastest lap comparison my not be entirely accurate either ... refueling was banned in 2010, so the cars started the races extremely heavy. The best potential for fast lap times would therefore be at the very end of the race when fuel loads were lightest. In 2007 they had many more laps on low fuel, sometimes refueling 3 times per race.
There is also the issue of hard vs. soft tires ... I would wager that there were many more laps run in 2007 on the soft tire/low fuel combination than in 2010.
IMO, the best comparison would be Q2 pole position times from each season because that session is always run on the lightest fuel load. Of course there are a number of other factors such as track temp, weather, etc. ... almost seems like a pointless debate unless the cars were run on the same track, by the same driver, on the same day.
Alonso is faster than Massa, Raikkonen was faster than Massa in 2007 obviously so it's not accurate to compare Massa 2007 to Alonso 2010 for example. Too many factors to say definitively which is faster.
I didnt use fastest race laps, I used Q2 times from 2007 and Q3 times from 2010 (the fastest low fuel session from each year). I agree there are many factors, but even with all those factors, the F10 is an average of .5 per lap faster. That's a HUGE gap in F1.