- 1,411
- Shaggy_Alonso
When comparing steering wheels, all that seems to be discussed is the relative specifications of each wheel, yet what seems like something of a taboo subject is that certain wheels simply produce better lap times than others, depending on the game (or to be more accurate, allow you to consistently access better lap times), and this doesn't necessarily correspond with how much you're paying for the wheel or which wheel is better on paper.
What i've noticed, and this may or may not be a genuine trend, is that often the cheaper wheels are actually quicker to race with than the more complex hardware. For instance, the G25/G27 wheels seem to be consistently inferior to the DFGT with Codemasters F1 games, even if they have better feedback in terms of a visceral enjoyment of the handling.
And then allegedly the G25 has much better FFB in F1 2012 than the technically superior G27. I've yet to try this for myself, but will be doing so shortly as I own both wheels, but naturally you don't expect the older wheel to be the quicker one.
Has anyone else experienced anything similar in the case of GT5?
Discuss.
What i've noticed, and this may or may not be a genuine trend, is that often the cheaper wheels are actually quicker to race with than the more complex hardware. For instance, the G25/G27 wheels seem to be consistently inferior to the DFGT with Codemasters F1 games, even if they have better feedback in terms of a visceral enjoyment of the handling.
And then allegedly the G25 has much better FFB in F1 2012 than the technically superior G27. I've yet to try this for myself, but will be doing so shortly as I own both wheels, but naturally you don't expect the older wheel to be the quicker one.
Has anyone else experienced anything similar in the case of GT5?
Discuss.