Ferrari accuses technician of attempted sabotage

  • Thread starter Thread starter ROAD_DOGG33J
  • 54 comments
  • 2,991 views
I guess that means it's up to Ferrari and/or the FIA to prove otherwise if they actually wanted to, which they may not anyway. I guess it's important for McLaren to make that statement. The fact still seems to stand that a senior member of the company did indeed receive info from a Ferrari employee. This statement is no surprise then. I do hope nothing gets screwed up over this, accept the guilty party of course.
 
Latest info (taken from f1-live.com ). We have a name, and that name's not Fernando :

F1's governing body has apparently accepted McLaren's invitation to launch an investigation into the spy scandal saga involving Nigel Stepney and Mike Coughlan.

The FIA has issued the following statement today:

"With the full cooperation of both teams, the FIA has initiated an investigation into matters involving Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro and Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes.

The remit of this investigation will focus solely on the requirements of the International Sporting Code and the Formula One Regulations."

McLaren had earlier insisted that "no Ferrari intellectual property" had been used for the design of its current MP4-22 single seater, and "invited the FIA to conduct a full review of its cars" to verify this claim.


Ferrari expressed concern that its information seems to have passed illegally from the sacked Stepney to McLaren's now suspended chief designer Coughlan, saying in its own statement that it reserved the right "to consider all implications, be they criminal, civil or of any other nature."

D.B. © CAPSIS International
Source GMM
 
I can see the tabloids over here bragging that "Our Lewis" beat Ferrari with their own car.. :rolleyes:
 
But where's the motive?...Settling an old score?
An entire post detailing the Ferrari vs. McLaren saga:

1966: McLaren enters Grand Prix racing as a constructor. Ferrari could have won the Constructor's Cup, but they sacked John Surtees in a bout of internal squabbling based on who would drive when during the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Mike Parkes drafted in, not to win races or offer technical expertise, but so Scuderia Ferrari would have a big man to play center for their basketball team.

1967: McLaren picks up pace. Is it the BRM engines or the switch to red paint? Ferrari complains it's not permitted, vows to change to a brighter shade of red in the next 30 years.

1968: McLaren changes to their papaya-orange hue, becomes faster than Ferrari, and wins more races than the Prancing Horse team. Enzo gets angry, since home-improvement stores are all out of orange, since Bruce and Denny have painted their Can-Am sports cars the same color.

1969: McLaren slumping somewhat, but Ferrari is slumpier. Garagistes win all the races, Ferrari reduced to running one car in some events due to school bus driver's and/or pipefitter's strike; possible 312B in the works.

1970: McLaren team in the doldrums; Bruce dies in testing at Goodwood. Ferrari wakes up in mid-season and dominates second-half of year with Jacky Ickx and Clay Regazzoni. Tragic year, not worth joking about.

1971: Ferrari's calendar off by six months; celebrates successes of half of last year and this season by taking rest of season off. Stewart and Tyrrell now garagiste of ire, and McLaren sorts out cars that aren't competitive, or break when they are leading races.

1972: McLaren and Ferrari both play second fiddle to Tyrrell and Lotus. Ken Tyrrell makes fun of Colin Champan's hat. What a bunch of lightweights.

1973: Canadian GP Pace Car and Williams team leads more laps than Ferrari does. 'Nuff said.

1974-1975: It took 8 years, but finally McLaren and Ferrari go head-to-head for the driver's and constructor's titles.

1976: At the Spanish GP, Hunt's McLaren is faster than Lauda's Ferrari, but the car is 3 centimeters too wide. McLaren is initially disqualified, Ferrari wins, but decision is eventually overtuned. At the British GP, both Ferraris take each other out in the first start, damaging Hunt's McLaren in the process. hunt jumps into the spare car, both Ferraris repaired. Hunt wins the race, but is disqualified; decision not overturned, Lauda declared race winner. At Italian GP McLaren is discovered to be using potentially illegal fuel; 105 octane isn't readily available for public road use. Ferrari uses this excuse to push the McLarens back to the back row. It works brilliantly, although Ferrari still manages to lose the race to Peterson's March.

1977: McLaren's M23 is old, but still competitive. Their M26 isn't quite as quick. Ferrari's old 312T3 is fast in Lauda and Reutemann's hands; Niki and carlos aren't the best of friends, too busy one-upping each other to worry about James Hunt punching a corner marshal at the Canadian GP, when both McLarens collided.

1980: McLaren and Ferrari both dreadful. Now they try to get each other disqualified so they can occupy the 12th row of the grid.

1982: FISA-FOCA wars. Ferrari has their own problems.

1983: McLaren 1-2 at Long Beach GP after qualifying 22-23. The very next race at Monaco they qualify 21-22, which results in a DNQ-DNQ. Ferrari sitting pretty for once, but Porsche engine development about to render Ferrari's two titles obsolete.

1984-1987: Reliable Porsche, followed by even more reliable Honda power, makes Pancing Horse cry. Ferrari couldn't find anything wrong with McLaren to complain to the FIA about, still deciphering Ron-Speak and busy firing Rene Arnoux for daytime soap opera antics.

1988: McLaren wins 15 races; Ferrari manages to win home race at Italy, whereby Senna bumps into a backmarker named Jean-Louis Schlesser. Ferrari swear they have nothing to do with it. Later, check from Bank of Modena appears Martin Brundle's account.


1989: Ferrari has unreliable semi-automatic transmssion, although it proves to operate fine in reverse gear. McLaren has dominant car and engines, personality clash between drivers. McLaren and Ferrari snicker at each other, although Ferrari wins the barbecue contest at Imola.

1990: Senna hates Prost, Senna hates Mansell, and vice-versa. Mansell dislikes Prost. Berger probably dislikes Mansell. Berger and Senna involved in pranking each other. Mansell whining about car, team, teammate, and vows to take Pluto away from planetary status upon retirement at end of year. Prost and Senna make up, it lasts two races. McLaren and Ferrari can't find anything to bitch about with each other, too busy putting PR departments in wind tunnels.

1991: Prost asks Ferrari to sack Cesere Fiorio, then Ferrari sacks Prost. Buisness as usual at Ferrari while McLaren trots off to another championship.

1992: Ferrari creates twin-floor cars, They fail miserably, both in speed and aerodynamics. McLaren loses title for first time in 4 years, too busy producting elevators for double-floor Ferraris.

1993: McLaren introduces the barge board. I just thought you should know when these ugly things first appeared on grand prix cars.

1994: McLaren and Ferrari have contests to see who can blow up more engines. McLaren has advantage, 30 engines to 20, but also has ability to choose a different engine supplier for following year.

1995: Ferrari fuel sample declared illegal at Brazilian GP, overturned. Not satisfied with outcome, McLaren tries to disqualify Ferrari for having two drivers on the #27 car during the slow-down lap, but loses the paperwork for filing disqualification.

1996: This time, Ferrari wins engine failure contest, 50 to 10. Ferrari even manages to have engine blow up on pace lap on one occasion, something not seen since the 1960s. But they still managed to win 3 races, McLaren: Nil.

1997: Ferrari paints car day-glo red, keeping 30-year-old promise to McLaren, but still manages to lose the title by bad sportsmanship. McLaren loses many engines, and destroys Mika Hakkinen's plastic turtle in retaliation.

1998-99: Poor turtle is a symbolic sacrifice for McLaren's success despite Ferrari's innate ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

2000-2004: Schumacher II reign begins. Mercedes kicks themselves for training driver in sports-car leagues only to have him defect to team that beats them in return. Extraneous tire testing here and there.

2005: McLaren has best car, worst reliability. Ferrari has the most red of all cars in field, next-worst reliability. But Ferrari wins every race that has less than 7 competitors in it.

2006: McLaren trades reliability for speed, Ferrari loses title due to self-inflicted implosion by acquiring Kimi Raikkonen, a McLaren driver.

2007: Ferrari technical wizard Nigel Stephany fired over coffee cremaer found in fuel tanks. Ferrari claims sabotage, McLaren admits they they visited Ferrari's pits. Official statement from Ferrari: "It was just a sleep-over party."
 
Well, Bernie has said that Lewis Hamilton will not be punished in anyway whatever happens in this spy row (presumably neither will ALonso)
 
1992: Ferrari creates twin-floor cars, They fail miserably, both in speed and aerodynamics. McLaren loses title for first time in 4 years, too busy producting elevators for double-floor Ferraris.

:lol:

Great post, Josh. 👍
 
Well, Bernie has said that Lewis Hamilton will not be punished in anyway whatever happens in this spy row (presumably neither will ALonso)
How could they be? They're not responsible for the theft. If McLaren were to lose points over the incident, the FIA would first have to prove that the stolen information was indeed used in the car and that McLaren management were aware of it. From the sounds of things, it was a senior technician who Stepney gave the info to and given his postion, said technician could easily use that data in developing the car without the likes of Dennis and Whitmarsh being aware of it. And even if they were to have points docked for the use of the information, they'd probably only lose points in the Constructors' Championship. I'd say a heavy fine and a rap on the knuckles would probably be the worst of it; there's no way the FIA could prove beyond reasonable doubt that McLaren knowingly used the Ferrari data. If the McLaren technician were smart, he'd be able to make the MP-4/22's data look like they had gradually arrived at the Ferrari data, kind of like knowing the all answers to a test before you take it.
 
Stepney denies allegations and will sue Ferrari -
news.bbc.co.uk
Nigel Stepney insists he has been made a scapegoat in the 'spy' saga that has rocked Formula One.

The Briton, formerly Ferrari's head of performance development, was sacked by the Italian team after being accused of leaking secrets to McLaren.

A meeting Stepney had with Honda boss Nick Fry has also been scrutinised, although Fry claims it was merely to discuss prospective job opportunities.

Now Stepney insists he is the fall guy, saying: "I've been framed."
How convoluted and twisted can F1 get? I'm not sure if you can believe him. But if I do wonder if Ferrari thought it would hurt them if Stepney went to Honda and decided it was better to disgrace him so no team would take him on. I don't know how true that could ever be or even provable but Ferrari will have to prove it and if they did orchestrate his dismissal it could backfire spectacularly.
Then again maybe Stepney's just saying this to save face..
 
You'd be surprised...

Ferrari's High Court action against Mike Coughlan was called off on Wednesday after the suspended McLaren chief designer provided the team with an affidavit.

The case, which has centred around allegations that Coughlan and his wife Trudy had received and copied confidential documents belonging to Ferrari, had started the day before.

It was then adjourned because it was not clear whether the affidavit, which outlines the Coughlans' knowledge of the case, could be used in ongoing criminal investigations in Italy.

Judge John Briggs had ordered Coughlan to hand an affidavit to Ferrari on Wednesday morning, saying that the hearing would continue if they did not.

The Italian team later said in a statement that Coughlan had provided them with an affidavit "relating to relevant facts and Ferrari has agreed not to forward the affidavit to the Italian criminal authorities".

Those investigations are centred around former Ferrari engineer Nigel Stepney, who allegedly leaked the documents to Coughlan.

Ferrari had only found out about the information leak after Coughlan's wife had taken the documents to a shop to be photocopied.

But, whilst confirming a deal concerning procedural aspects, Ferrari also said that their case against the Coughlans was not over.

"The case brought by Ferrari in England against the Coughlans therefore continues in terms of what is decided by the High Court in London," the statement added.

Formula One's governing body, the FIA, has charged the McLaren Mercedes team with the "unauthorised possession" of confidential documents belonging to rivals Ferrari.

According to an FIA statement: "Representatives of Vodafone McLaren Mercedes have been requested to appear before an extraordinary meeting of the FIA World Motor Sport Council in Paris on Thursday, July 26, 2007.

"The team representatives have been called to answer a charge that between March and July 2007, in breach of Article 151c of the International Sporting Code, Vodafone McLaren Mercedes had unauthorised possession of documents and confidential information belonging to Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro, including information that could be used to design, engineer, build, check, test, develop and/or run a 2007 Ferrari Formula One car."

Article 151c relates to: "Any fraudulent conduct or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition or to the interests of motor sport generally."

The development marks a new twist in F1's ongoing 'spying' row, which concerns allegations made by Ferrari that former engineer Nigel Stepney leaked the documents to McLaren designer Mike Coughlan.

Ferrari are currently pursuing the matter through both the British and Italian courts, with legal proceedings against Coughlan and his wife being heard at the High Court in London.

Meanwhile, criminal proceedings have been instigated in Italy against Stepney, who has denied both leaking the documents and accusations that he tampered with Ferrari's cars prior to May's Monaco Grand Prix.

Although yet to release a statement in response to the FIA summons, McLaren Mercedes have previously denied incorporating any of Ferrari's intellectual property into their car.

Speaking at last weekend's British Grand Prix, team principal Ron Dennis said: "I can categorically state there are no developments whatsoever that have occurred on our cars...relating to this.

"I can comfortably say this will not end in anything that causes McLaren any embarrassment."

However, if McLaren are found guilty, then the FIA has a range of punishments at its disposal, ranging from the docking of points to the expulsion of the team from the championship.

After Sunday's race at Silverstone, McLaren's Lewis Hamilton holds a 12-point lead in the drivers' championship over team-mate Fernando Alonso.

The team also holds a 25-point lead over Ferrari in the constructors' championship.

SkySports
 
What a mess.... but F1 has always had its fair share of off-track drama.

Hopefully they'll get this sorted out quickly so the majority of focus can be on the brilliant competitive racing in this year's F1 season. 👍
 
God knows what would be said if McLaren were A) Guilty and B) disqualified for the season
Even if "A)" turns out to be true I seriously doubt the FIA would ever seriously consider "B)". Otherwise it would be a disaster for the season, and F1 support in general.

The real question is will Honda still consider hiring Stepney & Coughlan?

In fact, does the FIA (officially or unoffcially) have the power to ban Stepney and Coughlan from ever working in F1 again? Assuming of course, the investigations proves without any doubt that Stepney gave Coughlan copies of those Ferrari technical documents.
 
God knows what would be said if McLaren were A) Guilty and B) disqualified for the season

I know what I would say... congratulations to the guilty parties for ruining the best Formula One season in years and destroying the credibility of the entire sport. It would be a terrible shame, and the onus would have to be on proving that McLaren used the Ferrari plans in such a way that directly (and unequivocally) influenced the design (or redesign) of their own car. If that is not established, then the FIA would risk destroying the sport over this incident.

But however much I'd hate to see McLaren disqualified, and however much it could seriously damage the team, the drivers and the entire sport, if it is proven beyond all reasonable doubt that McLaren has indeed benefited from industrial espionage, then they are the ones who deserve to take the rap for it.

That said, industrial espionage is a part of F1 and has been for a long time. Teams even pay professional photographers to snap every piece of their principal opponent's cars at any given opportunity (hence why F1 car wrecks get covered by tarpaulins) - this is well-known and out in the open already. But this could be the straw that broke the camel's back. And clearly, there are people in F1 who are greedy and stupid enough to try it. Let's just pray that the awesomely talented drivers and the devoted Formula One fans (like us) are not the ones who end up cheated because of their stupidity.
 
Worked for Jacques.


Meeeee-owwww


36098_02.jpg
 
Back