- 41,126
Because.And seriously now that you can have a decent 355 for TR money, why would anyone go for the TR?
Because.And seriously now that you can have a decent 355 for TR money, why would anyone go for the TR?
Really, there's no other answer with a Ferrari.Because.
And seriously now that you can have a decent 355 for TR money, why would anyone go for the TR?
365 GT4 2+2
400
412
Before you go crying to your mother about the 355 and 456 be advised there are several on eBay currently with buy-it-nows under $65k.
Because of two things:
Ferrari heart = Engine
V12 > V8
Yeah... except the Testarossa doesn't have a V12, does it?
Either way I mentioned several Ferraris with V12s that you can have that are both faster AND more reliable AND more usable. I'll buy a TR if I want my differential to fail and pay $15k for the replacement and ensuing engine-out service. I'll buy a late model 355 for slightly more cash if I want zillions of miles of awesome trouble-free motoring or a well-sorted early one for less money and the same deal.
The Testarossa is a Boxer 12.
The 355 is the far superior car in nearly every aspect.
That's not strictly true.
180 degree V12?Yeah... except the Testarossa doesn't have a V12, does it?
It's technically a 180 degree V12 because it isn't a boxer engine -- opposing pistons share crank pins. I think you could still call it a flat-12, though.aka flat 12
It ain't no V-12.
The engine in the Testarossa is not a Boxer-12 and it is not an H-12 or HO-12 (because those are both just different names for boxer engines). If the engine is not a Boxer engine but it is flat, than it is a V12 with a 180 degree crankpin; because the definition of a V engine is based on crank pin design, not appearance.aka flat 12
It ain't no V-12.
I find this one beautiful I don't know about you guys...
![]()
And I didn't really see much of the F430 but I love how it looks...love it
![]()
I find this one beautiful I don't know about you guys...
![]()
And I didn't really see much of the F430 but I love how it looks...love it
![]()
The engine in the Testarossa is not a Boxer-12 and it is not an H-12 or HO-12 (because those are both just different names for boxer engines). If the engine is not a Boxer engine but it is flat, than it is a V12 with a 180 degree crankpin; because the definition of a V engine is based on crank pin design, not appearance.
aka flat 12
It ain't no V-12.
I agree with this. And most of the time I would call it a flat 12. But asserting that it isn't a V12 because of its cylinder bank angle is incorrect, as a flat 12 as seen in the Testarossa is simply a type of V12....But still, if it's not less than 180 degrees then it's not a "V", is it?I'd be calling it a flat 12, even if, like you said, it's a 180 degree V. Just for the sake of simplicity.
Ferrari themselves called it a Boxer in the 512BB's name. I think it's acceptable to use the term if they do.
Wait, the 2.3 wasn't a 2.3?BMW called it a "Z3 2.3i." Doesn't mean any of that stuff was true.
Wait, the 2.3 wasn't a 2.3?
The P4/5 was never meant to be a concept, but it a 1-off.Even if it may be something of a concept...
And a shame this isn't road legal to my knowledge...