Ferraris lack of development. Explained?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blake
  • 8 comments
  • 727 views

Blake

Premium
Messages
10,976
Australia
NSW, Australia
Messages
haswell00
Grandprix.com
Ferrari's lack of competitiveness in recent races has been a surprise after such a strong start to the year in Australia, Malaysia and Bahrain. It seemed that McLaren had improved significantly and that Ferrari had stood still.

No-one seems to understand why and Ferrari is, by nature, rather secretive and so does not always allow its problems to leak out into the outside world.

One possibility is that Ferrari has been having troubles with its windtunnel.

The team relies heavily on its Renzo Piano-designed windtunnel, rather than running two windtunnels like some of its rivals. The team is investing heavily in CFD technology at the moment and intends to use much more of the virtual technology rather than building a second wind tunnel. This is a sensible strategy but the problem is that if the main windtunnel is out of action, the team may struggle to keep up. Modern F1 windtunnels work round the clock and parts do become worn out as a result. The tunnels require "down time" for suitable servicing.

We hear on the grapevine that about a month ago Ferrari suffered a failure of its rolling road system in the Maranello windtunnel. The rolling roads in the modern F1 windtunnels are made from a steel belt, which circulates at around 180mph. If a rolling road breaks, the damage can be considerable as lumps of metal fly around at 180mph.

The word is that this may have been what happened.

And that Ferrari has been in trouble ever since.

—http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns19298.html

Very speculative, but quite plausible. It's the best excuse that I've read so far for Ferrari’s halt, relative to the field.
 
But... The car they used in Barcelona already had a huge advantage. I can't believe they didn't have designs ready before the races. I mean general stuff, like Low-downforce configs and high-downforce. General.

Though there's something to it - noticed how, apart from the Monaco wheel-covers, they disappeared from the pages fo the F1.com Technical Analysis?
 
I don't think the lack of performance from a whole team can be due to a wind-tunnel. I'd believe it more if it were some personal issue with some of Ferrari's top people, to be honest.
 
But... The car they used in Barcelona already had a huge advantage.


This is F1 Metar, teams are always busy to improve their cars. If you don't work on it, even between 2 races in, you'll fall behind. F1 is a sport where the car is being updated nearly every weekend.

I heard something like that article as well on TV, windtunnels are one of the most important things to improve your car so I'm not surprised they're running behind because of that.
 
I understand that they need "down time" to fix the tunnel but months of downtime? If something that important is broken, they will probably have people work on it 24-7. I dont see how it can take 3+ months to fix a giant fan.
 
Heh, this does seem an odd explanation for lack of pace, but it does carry some weight. Ferrari's wind tunnel is supposed to be one of, if not the, best in the world. Most tunnels simply blow air straight on at a static model; Ferrari's can supposedly simulate yaw, pitch and roll, can be temperature controlled to a better than 1 deg. C accuracy, has a 5M diameter fan that needs 2000W of power to run, has a rolling road system that's synchronised with the wind speed to minimise the boundary layer effect, and the engineers can supposedly control not just wind speed, but turbulence and direction too.

All in all, quite a wind tunnel. I can see why not being able to use it would hurt the team, but how long does the thing take to fix? :dunce:
 
This is F1 Metar, teams are always busy to improve their cars. If you don't work on it, even between 2 races in, you'll fall behind. F1 is a sport where the car is being updated nearly every weekend.

I heard something like that article as well on TV, windtunnels are one of the most important things to improve your car so I'm not surprised they're running behind because of that.

But Ferrari had 6 months to develop what was, in the beginning, a killer car. I'm sure that even if they haven't improved, the car should be good for more.
 
Yeah, when you look at it like that it does seem a little odd. The Ferrari seems fast enough in a straight line, but apparently suffers from lack of rear end grip at low speed. It really doesn't make sense that they've dropped behind so much, so quickly.
 
Back