- 21,792
- NJ/USA
- Blitzbay
Nothing. The only thing to create interest is to have a winning American driver in Formula 1.
Or to have it appeal to Americans by being on TV at a time that ISN'T at 7 AM in the morning.
Nothing. The only thing to create interest is to have a winning American driver in Formula 1.
Actually, if a popular NASCAR driver tried to make the switch to F1 and actually had some success in doing so (never happen), it could spark an interest in the sport.
.
Actually, if a popular NASCAR driver tried to make the switch to F1 and actually had some success in doing so (never happen), it could spark an interest in the sport.
But like you said, they don't have NCAA and the lot. I happen to be interested in European football as well as racing, and this year I just couldn't keep up with everything. I haven't even attempted to watch the NFL this season. There are only so many hours in the weekend for college football, MLB, NFL, NBA, and everything else.
But I'm sure an F1 driver would have no problem in NASCAR right?
I personally like both(as well as most other forms of motorsport) and can see that there are some drivers that have a great amount of talent in both series'.
But I'm sure an F1 driver would have no problem in NASCAR right?
NBA? Where have you been? They aren't on till Christmas.
Uh, how exactly? They don't pay anything to watch the sport. Suzuka cannot hold 17.5 million people alone, so the Japanese public were watching it on television, and the broadcaster would have been paying the same amount for the rights to coverage if 175 million, 17.5 million, or 1.75 million people were watching the races.
This is just StockCarRacer bumping his own thread because it fell off the first page of the subforum.
Have you ever bought products simply because they were advertised in Formula 1? Very few people actually do. Comapnies that sponsor Formula 1 teams do not just sponsor Formula 1 teams. Look at some of the big sponsors that have been in Formula 1 this year - Vodafone, Red Bull, Shell, Claro, AT&T, Virgin. Their Formula 1 programs are all part of a much bigger advertising campaign. Vodafone have billboards, print adverts and television campaigns everywhere. Red Bull sponsor dozens of sports teams and athletes. Virgin cover dozens of markets with their subsidiaries. That's the strength of their marketing: they image they create for themselves through Formula 1 and all of their other advertising. It is very difficult to specifically point to which customers develop loyalty to a particular brand simply because of their Formula 1 sponsorship. In fact, a lot of the marketing that is associated with Formula 1 is actually aimed at existing customers within the target demographic of people who watch the sport.Those 17.5 million people aren't necessarily paying anything to the sport, but they would be influenced by what is seen on track, and become a customer of a manufacturer in F1, or a large firm seeing the popularity of the sport in Japan, and sponsoring a team in F1.
"May" being the operative term. And any money that finds its way into the sport would only be fractional at best.It may bring money to the sport.
I did an entire degree in business, so I know what I'm talking about. Business decisions are not made on the basis of what might work. You seem to be under the impression that if a company is involved in Formula 1, then they will get more sales; that by meeting condition A, result B will happen every time. It doesn't work like that.You didn't do any business subject, did you?
When I was talking about F1 being one of the highest watched TV programs in Australia, I was speaking of Mark Webber.
Sach_F1Thank goodness.
So, you're an American who dislikes NASCAR, right?
Sach_F1Correct. I don't care for it at all. I don't like the style of racing, nor it's antics.
Blitz24There is almost a 0% chance that F1 will be a top watched sport in America anytime soon.
Why don't you care about NASCAR? What does it stand for in your opinion?
Oh, look. The thread has been inactive for five days, and in comes StockCarRacer witha useless post. Again.
Why don't you care about NASCAR? What does it stand for in your opinion?
Sach_F1You're really bating this thing. Who says any form of racing has to 'stand for something'?
peter_vod69"National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing"
StockCarRacerSay, if we have a Puerto Rican who has won the World Championship, then he would spark interest in the sport in his homeland.
I might be wrong in saying this but its more likely that NASCAR's viewership would grow in European countries if they got a very successful driver there (from a particular country) than if the same were to happen for an American driver in F1. Its going to take decades for America to become more interested in a sport with zero American cars and 1 American driver.
I have to disagree with that. The general vibe towards Nascar in Europe is not good. Few people have heard of it or know what it actually is. Whereas people who know of it generally have something derogatory to say about it. The only way Nascar would really catch on in Europe is if they ditched the ovals. It would still be a struggle though.
Personally, I like Nascar, but it is far from being my favourite racing series.
Yeah its not everyone's cup of tea. The only benefit it would have in Europe is that it would always be in prime-time on Sunday Nights.
I still think the OP isn't getting the main message sadly. I was using the reverse example poorly.
I somehow missed this thread until tonight and decided to read through from the beginning. It's GTP awards time too. I think there should be a "No 🤬 Sherlock" award. He'd get my vote for some of his posts.
PupikIf a spleen and a tomato juice were involved in a war between aliens, would the horseradish win a poodle, and then spark interest in his homeland?