Joey D
Premium
- 48,062

- Lakes of the North, MI
- GTP_Joey
- GTP Joey
How can that be?
GM: Chevy, GMC, Buick, Saturn, Daewoo, Cadillac, Saab, Hummer, and Pontiac.
Ford: Ford, Mercury, Lincoln, Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin, Mazda, and Volvo.
Main selling companies for GM in the US: GMC, Chevy, Pontiac, Buick, Cadilliac, Hummer, Saab. No one buys Daewoo's and the only way you buy an Isuzu is if you buy a panel truck.
Main selling companies for Ford in the US: Ford, Mercury, Lincoln, Volvo, Mazda. Aston is elite, Jag's are up there as well, and same goes for Land Rover.
If any truck is outdated it's GM's current lineup. And UNTIL the new breed of GM trucks comes out the F-series is still superior...thing is even if the new GM trucks comes out Ford will still outsell it because the F-series is the best selling vehicle ever in history. And until GM outsells the F-series it will continue to be this way.
Yup the GMT800 line is pretty much crap compared to other trucks on the road, for there time they were awesome but a change was due 2-3 years ago. But the Tundra is still a better truck then anything else you can buy right now. The GMT900 will be good and I expect it to be better then the F-Series, but I think the new Tundra will own all of them again.
The Suburan/Tahoe/Yukon I put in the same catagory because they are basically the same (and the XL models of the Tahoe/Yukon ARE Suburbans underneath) and they DO compete with the Explorer. The Explorer for several years now is just as large as the Suburban and the new Tahoe/Yukon is the same relitive size. The Expedition is completely useless, and I expect Ford to kill it off soon like they did with the Excursion.
The Explorer doesn't compare with anything from the 900 platform, they compare with everything from the 360 platform...meaning Trailblazer, Envoy, Rainer, that Saab thing, and that Isuzu thing. The Expedition is based off a F-series platform meaning it goes up again the 900 platform, meaning that the Expedition sucks in comparision.
You can't be serious, rebadged Daewoos win the arguement here. I think your GM bias is a little overpowering your judgement. I do like some GM products and hate some Ford products so my bias is quite a bit less vs yours. If anything I'm biased towards anything European/Japanese/Australian. While the Focus isn't the best Ford hatch (Mazda3 wins that) it's not the worst hatch in America by far. The Aveo is followed by the new Calibur. While Golfs are fantastic--they are also more expensive--but they are worth it. Now for something you do not realize, Ford Motor Credit like GMAC has a "new buyer" program and what that means is the Focus is part of that "new buyer" program...the dealers won't stick that on a more expensive car like a V6 Mustang or Fusion. VAG doesn't have such a program in this aspect so the Golf is out of the price range of "new buyers". I got turned down twice for a base Jetta and Golf but got 2 car loans from FMC back to back. 2 wins for me.
When did I say anything about Daewoo's? The only rebadged Daewoo is the Aveo, which is utter trash next to the likes of the Scion xA and the upcoming and sweet ass Fit. The Cobalt is a car based off an Opel platform...meaning it's decent.
The Caliber is one of the worst hatchbacks according to Car and Driver's artilce in their latest issue. In fact here is the list.
7. Suzuki Reno
6. Dodge Caliber
5. Hyundai Accent
4. Toyota Yaris (awesome little car)
3. Kia Rio
2. Nissan Versa
1. Honda Fit
Honestly if you want an awesome compact car with a good deal for new buyer, you should get a Scion, a Toyota at heart.
The European spec Focus IS better that the US-spec I believe but--that doesn't automatically say the current Focus is crap. I could come up with the same arguement for something GM but I won't--we're beating a dead horse here and I won't comment any further about the Focus issue. I'm finished with this part of the discussion since neither one of us will sway the opinion there is no point in continuing it.
But you can't because what GM can bring over then do, Saturn will be Opel in a few years (good move). There are a lot more Euro based GM's then Fords.
There you go again, saying something is crap is an opinion and that can't be the reason why you don't see them. Granted there are better cars in this segment but seriously anything that's Volvo derrived is NOT by ANY means crap. It happens to suffer from the exact same stigma as the Camry--point A to B comfy safe reliable driving.
People don't buy the 500 because it's trash compared to the likes of the Camry and Accord. Plus you don't have to deal with the car falling apart on you if you buy something from Japan. No Ford lot around me even has a 500 for me to go look at. How do they expect to sell something I can't even look at?
But my point is Ford isn't better then GM, in fact they are worse. But both are crap when you compare them to the likes of Honda and Toyota, which build better cars and with the exclusion of the Ridgeline, better trucks. American car makers need to step it up if they want to beat the likes of their Asian competitors. GM is trying to step up their game but they have an idiot at the helm (Wagner) and idiot minions putting the cars together (UAW).
And who would've thought they'd see me bad mouth American cars