Without wanting to bring this discussion too far out of the topic it belongs in... surely you see the irony in criticizing one game with "half assed modeling" when the other imports 800 models from their last-gen title from 6 years ago.
Going by your last two lines... why do you expect a paint option in, if you recognize setting your hopes low means less disappointment?
I'm still thinking we're going to be getting an editor of some sort. It's a huge selling point, and FM (as just one example) has had it since almost the same time as GT4 being released. It's about time PD recognize it's a hugely desired feature with online racing. Plus... Kaz did mention it rather pointedly in a slide presentation, an image I don't have on hand right now (but I'm sure someone does).
You're a troll sometimes you know that? If it aint in your agreement you blast (or try to) posters with your little comeback posts.
I'm basing the stickers and such off of a report from a magazine article that said such, and there has always been paint options for GT, have you not noticed that? Or did you think you couldn't choose a different paint job? I didnt say I expect a repaint. And GTs modeling of the cars have always been spot on. Regardless of the generation, they're always accurate and look closer to real life than any car game there is. Not just my opinion, it's the opinion of many. Weve seen examples of cars (such as the Skyline GTR) in FM3 that aren't correctly rendered. And you got a lot of nerve saying things like 'GT is importing 800 cars from their other games' when Forza has done the same thing. Show me a racing sim that has sequels with no 'carry-over' cars. You expect this and that but bash me for expecting something that has basically been repeated by more than a few sources and a paint job option that has been in GT games since day 1?