I'm playing on VR since launch of the system. And playing Gran Turismo from GT1, with all games. Including psp.
I agree that PSVR2 is great. I adore it. What I struggle with is your suggestion that PSVR2 makes the design of the game make sense. I don't think that's the case at all. At first the wow factor certainly creates a situation where you just don't care. That was certainly my experience. However, soon after the reality of many of the poor game decisions start to become glaring. Many of which are only present in VR (such as the HUD issues). I am reasonably happy with my PSVR2 experience but it's not without issues, nor is the game (with or without PSVR2).
That's because of my limited english and I must apologize for not being able to explain it correctly.
No worries. We both shared a bit of blame for that misunderstanding. I see what you mean, as far as including VR (especially across the entire game) does bring with it certain limitations, and it becomes a bit more obvious why... and you tend to get a better appreciation for it, when you're sitting in a beautifully rendered car, flying down a beautifully rendered track, all in VR. It is quite an achievement.
In theory it's easy yes, but only PD knows if they have some kinda simplified but coherent 'mechanical' model or they just code the steering directly. Both can be done easily for coders. If steering is coded directly somehow, then all relations to classical mechanics is irrelevant in this debate of ours.
Heaviest component(s) ahead of driver vs. behind driver. It's not that tough.
The Scapes are about on-time - but the Lancia is real early.
Yes - and the bad news is it was last year's May-July update gap. The first teaser post-May (1.48) was June 13th, 42 days before the July update.
)
...on top of said car not getting a tie-in event (permanent or Special Event, barring as a traffic car in third Civic Special Event).(Also quite amusing is the fact that the CR-V didn't get any social media posts last month, for reasons a lot of you can probably infer.
I guess it does, but since it is a computer program it can be coded directly that a car has more or less grip & is conditionally over steered or under steered based on parameters & numerical values that might be a direct input by coding. E.g. in GT5 if we used the GT5 garage editor we could change the grip values directly in the editor regardless of tire compound or weight or downforce or drivetrain.
Not to mention quite a bit of technobabble, that hardly holds up. Like a character on Star Trek explaining how to adjust the warp field...way too many 'maybes, shoulds, coulds, possibles, & guesses' to make a credible case..
www.jalopnik.com
Unfortunately a load of outlets ran with one version or the other without checking first, which was pretty depressing as both versions were out at roughly the same time.British Sports Car Brand Marcos Announces Comeback With The Rich Energy Guy As CEO [Update: Marcos Motor Company Says They're A Different Marcos] - Jalopnik
There are a few things here that give us pause, even without the Rich Energy guy being involved.
With this kind of confusion over the license owners (cf : update at the bottom of the article), we're won't see Marcos back in Gran Turismo any time soon. I guess..
What’s a “natural” type of track for comparison purposes
Morgan are very much still going! They've just released their new Supersport.
If the ownership of the brand and intellectual property are in question there's possibly more scenarios where they can use than there are if the brand was dormant in some major car manufacturers portfolio - including not bothering with obtaining a license agreement at all (it's hard to be sued by someone for using their IP, if their ownership is disputed in the first place).
Can‘t say I agree.
Ian Bell and his cronies are located in Britain so they know their way around acquiring tons of British licenses. Project CARS' tracklist was bloated with (good) British tracks.
Couldn't agree more, especially when the game lacks things for the slower cars. Sainte-Croix could have been a totally different track (or could have proposed a much more interesting alternative layouts) if they'd stuck closer to the reality of the roads around the lake.
Marcos have licensed their cars to Project Motor Racing (most notably the Mantara LM600). There's still hope somewhat.British Sports Car Brand Marcos Announces Comeback With The Rich Energy Guy As CEO [Update: Marcos Motor Company Says They're A Different Marcos] - Jalopnik
There are a few things here that give us pause, even without the Rich Energy guy being involved.
With this kind of confusion over the license owners (cf : update at the bottom of the article), we're won't see Marcos back in Gran Turismo any time soon. I guess..
