People have different expectations. For some people their expectations were met.
I honestly find it hard to believe that deep down, without any bias, some people expected GT6 to have less features and conent than GT5. Why would they?
People have different expectations. For some people their expectations were met.
And those who have a problem with others being okay with what the game has to offer, is even more mind blowing. That's one thing I massively dislike, is that others feel the need to down those who ACTUALLY enjoy the game. Yeah whatever man. 👎The fact that everyone isn't upset with the fact that GT6 doesn't even have everything that GT5 has is mind blowing,seems as though the people defending this game are just blindly defending it,for every good thing about this game there's two bad things.
Precedent. It's happened with other games where to make room for something, programming-wise, features were dropped.I honestly find it hard to believe that deep down, without any bias, some people expected GT6 to have less features and conent than GT5. Why would they?
Precedent. It's happened with other games where to make room for something, programming-wise, features were dropped.
You're right and on the surface at least GT6 doesn't deliver with this. I suspect the completely new physics are taking up a lot of room or something and that in itself is the "replacement feature."But in this case there weren't any 'replacement' features, there are just flat out less than GT5. Surely if someone was expecting features to be dropped they would have also expected something else in their place?
I just find it hard to believe people can be happy playing a game that not only doesn't have all the features of the previous game but doesn't even have most of the promised features.I have no problem with people being happy with the game but also supporting the fact that the community wants more but most think GT6 is fine the way it is and just want us to shut up and be happy with the game.And those who have a problem with others being okay with what the game has to offer, is even more mind blowing. That's one thing I massively dislike, is that others feel the need to down those who ACTUALLY enjoy the game. Yeah whatever man. 👎
I just find it hard to believe people can be happy playing a game that not only doesn't have all the features of the previous game but doesn't even have most of the promised features.I have no problem with people being happy with the game but also supporting the fact that the community wants more but most think GT6 is fine the way it is and just want us to shut up and be happy with the game.
I think it's more the repetitive nature of the complaints. The same things across multiple threads on a daily basis.
GT6 has better physics, more tracks, more cars. For me, this outweighs certain features and bugs.
I see your point and totally respect it.I think it's more the repetitive nature of the complaints. The same things across multiple threads on a daily basis.
GT6 has better physics, more tracks, more cars. For me, this outweighs certain features and bugs.
Yep I guess it's different for everyone ... the moment they realize it isn't what they expected ... some find out in two weeks others find out in twp months ... and all at a different pace ... that's why it seems here to be a constant stream of complaints ... and true! it can be bothersome ... because GT6 has alot of positive sides too ...
I won't mention names but there are a few ringleaders who have been doing it for months. Many positive posts get hit with a wave of negativity. Then if you respond positively to their negative posts, you are then called an apologist or fanboy.
Certain character flaws are much more game breaking than any bug, lack of updates or communication.
On the brighter side, I can fuel my positivity with their negativity. The tank is half full.
I suspect the completely new physics are taking up a lot of room or something and that in itself is the "replacement feature."
I'm not sure. I'm simply looking for a reason as to why we have less in GT6 than in GT5.Do you mean physically in disc space or taking up a lot of time to make? I don't think any driving games' physics engine has ever taken up a lot of disc space. Wasn't the GT Academy at Indy Road Course about 220Mb? That obviously includes the track and 2 cars' textures and geometry, the graphics engine, menus and network code too. I think the Next Car Game 2.0 demo is about 350Mb and that has a much more advanced soft body physics engine, 24 cars and other things included. That's small when you have 50GB discs as storage.
you might expect that the team which develops the physics is an entirely different team from the one which develops the car sounds for example .... so I don't think this explains it .... sorryI'm not sure. I'm simply looking for a reason as to why we have less in GT6 than in GT5.
No need to be sorry. If I'm wrong I'd prefer someone say something.you might expect that the team which develops the physics is an entirely different team from the one which develops the car sounds for example .... so I don't think this explains it .... sorry
the number 1 reason can only be ... a release date pushed "back" to 12-6-2013 by Sony.
I'm inclined to agree with you on this.No doubt there are specious complaints made about relatively trivial issues, trumped up, repeated, and heavily defended by their troll designers as if they're far more than they are. But it's also easy to lump every complaint as if it was one of those.
It's funny, If it wasn't for the fact that PD has been stone cold silent on the advertised features still missing after nearly four months, I wouldn't have any major gripe with PD at all. Since I got into this back when GT5 came out (my first automobile game in over 30 years of owning computers, and being used to higher end engineering workstations with beefed up graphics and sound, in fact the sole reason why I own ANY yesterday's-technology-powered game console), I rarely took issue with PD's vision and accepted bugs would be resolved in as timely a manner as PD could fix them. Patience was the rule.
But going on 4 months of zero information on three relatively major, advertised, undelivered portions of the game, and an observable shift in focus by PD/Sony from the unfinished, current product to the PS4 version is far more than disconcerting and is beginning to look more like deceptive advertising.
Deliver the missing content.
This is not true for the most part. When people say words to the effect of, "The game is flawed but I love the new physics cars and tracks", or, "I love [this] about the game and that's enough for me to enjoy it", generally those posts are respected. When someone says, "GT6 is the way it is because [insert random target of blame]", and are then asked to provide a shred of proof for their assertion, that's a different kettle of fish. Opinions are fine, making factual statements you can't back up doesn't go over well, nor should it.I won't mention names but there are a few ringleaders who have been doing it for months. Many positive posts get hit with a wave of negativity. Then if you respond positively to their negative posts, you are then called an apologist or fanboy.
I can see how people enjoy the GT series still, the day/night cycles are beautiful, many tracks are beautiful and premium models are too. So if someone does not mind the obvious gameplay flaws and prefers the driving above the racing experience there is enjoyment to be had like in any game.I won't mention names but there are a few ringleaders who have been doing it for months. Many positive posts get hit with a wave of negativity. Then if you respond positively to their negative posts, you are then called an apologist or fanboy.
Certain character flaws are much more game breaking than any bug, lack of updates or communication.
On the brighter side, I can fuel my positivity with their negativity. The tank is half full.
Where did you get that idea ? And where does it show?I think it shows that PD don't even look at this site.
Sarcasm no?Where did you get that idea ? And where does it show?
I assume he's following that usual train of thought that if anyone has something bad to say about something they're not a fan.
I am not saying they are or aren't but there are perfectly good and obvious reasons for not delivering the content like this:I can't see why they would suddenly take a U turn and not deliver on promised/advertised content, its not like the PS4 was suddenly thrown in front of them. I think the most likely scenario is that they are tweaking everything to perfection and we know what a perfectionist Kaz is. I really can't see them just dumping GT6.