Probably someone who believes in things like "the Constitution" and "limited government".
So we're d-bags now because we think differently than you? Thank god you're no longer a mod.
This, but sadly I think it's more likely to be driven by a re-enactivist than just 'cos (unless you happen to live near Jay Leno) - which averages out at a very, very low uncool.On a whim? Cool. But only if you drive it like you would anything else. Doing the whole pretend-military dressing up to drive it would be seriously uncool - but doing your shopping in it or turning up to your grandparents' house in it would be pretty funny.
No, it's the Hippocracy that some members show, being someone offended doesn't mean anything about guilt. :unimpressed: I see no reason for you to be SO upset or say such things.
Although, I consider it a personal insult you would suggest that conflicting opinions would change my interpretation of the AUP/TOS (so again, thank god I'm not a mod cause I might bann you for being upset right?!![]()
).
Frankly, that's just low.
Wait a minute? You called us d-bags for thinking that the truck is uncool because it represented someone who's anti-government to the point of being a militiaman (think Terry Nichols or Timothy McVeigh (Oklahoma City bombing for those not from the US)). You also seem to think we're d-bags because we happened to think a Soviet military vehicle was cool for whatever reason.
This is the cool wall, not the political ideology wall where we must hate the imminent Red Menace.
You seemed to have missed that it was about how inconsistent the opinions are, nothing about politics.
Riding in an American military truck makes you a nutjob terrorist wannabe but riding in a soviet military truck is cool and carries none of the same implications?
I also want to point out I did't say people who voted this uncool are d-bags. I said people who voted it uncool for imagined "murica" stereotypes because of its military origins but didn't do the same for soviet vehicles were engaging in d-baggery.
Maybe it's splitting hairs but I feel there's a difference.
It's about consistency and prejudice, not politics or what you think is cool.
Driving a military truck doesn't make you a nut job, it's just the impression the vehicle gives off to some of us, and honestly it's probably a fairly valid statement. For whatever reason you seem to think this makes the person who thinks that way a d-bag, which anyone who's viewed this thread can see you were referring to Zeinth and myself and maybe a few others.
And your comments about how people seem to think a Soviet truck is cool and not an American one gives off the impression you are some how politically offended by this because of the red Commie bastards.
You're using a lot of words I haven't used and making inferences I never made.
I didn't say people are d-bags for not like an american truck or that they were d-bags for like a soviet truck. I said it was d-baggery to be inconsistent and to make the assumption that when you drive an american m. truck you are a domestic terrorist and when you drive a soviet m. truck that isn't the case.
I keep telling you and you keep ignoring it... This isn't about politics or what you do or do not like, it's about being consistent. Thinking someone is a crazy person for driving an American military truck and not thinking the same for driving a Soviet military truck is inconsistent.
Wait a minute? You called us d-bags for thinking that the truck is uncool because it represented someone who's anti-government to the point of being a militiaman (think Terry Nichols or Timothy McVeigh (Oklahoma City bombing for those not from the US)). You also seem to think we're d-bags because we happened to think a Soviet military vehicle was cool for whatever reason.
This is the cool wall, not the political ideology wall where we must hate the imminent Red Menace.
Except McVeigh was not a right-winger.
Me either.D-bags never cease to amaze me.
I don't think nutjob terrorist wannabes would be driving around in a 40 year old Soviet light duty pickup truck, no. The metaphor breaks down a bit when reversed.Riding in an American military truck makes you a nutjob terrorist wannabe but riding in a soviet military truck is cool and carries none of the same implications?![]()
Consistency of opinions being a long held tradition determining coolness from the thing adopted from the event in that show where disputes regarding hypocrisy were settled by the tall guy putting a picture of a car too high for the short guy to reach.I also want to point out I did't say people who voted this uncool are d-bags. I said people who voted it uncool for imagined "murica" stereotypes because of its military origins but didn't do the same for soviet vehicles were engaging in d-baggery.
he also experimented with drugs (methamphetamine and cannabis)
It concerns me that you resent me speaking ill of a domestic terrorist and a domestic terrorist organization (the Michigan Militia).
In reality, this started as a simple issue of disliking the inconsistency in cool voting
Was never about politics, terrorist, or whatever other imagined associations you make with this vehicle.
U.S. made military vehicle comes up and it's uncool cause you look like a "we the people" type or w/e.
Communist made military vehicle comes up and zomg that's so cool.