The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
If I liked the Starlet, I would point out the highest number, but since I don't, I'll point out the lowest number.
GTP Cool Wall: 1978 -1984 Toyota Starlet (P60)
- Thread starter Wiegert
- 62 comments
- 4,611 views
- 3,158
- United Kingdom
- ask
- 5,065
- Fort Worth
- That_sneaky_azN
And this is why you get feedback like such.
The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
So you say I get feedback like this because people don't agree with me. If so, than that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
- 5,065
- Fort Worth
- That_sneaky_azN
Last edited:
- 3,158
- United Kingdom
- ask
- 3,200
- Murcie LP710
The term you're looking for is actually "flawed logic."
The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
INEEDNAWZZZ
Premium
- 1,757
- Lincoln
- EGGSBAWCKS
- DigitalLuke64DD
...this thread has gone to 🤬 verrrry quickly.
- 3,158
- United Kingdom
- ask
The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
I'm just stating my opinion, what wrong with that?
- 14,424
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
It being an opinion doesn't exclude it from being a negative comment. It's all just a bit ironic. It's fine that you think that, but the way you approached it is a bit odd. You point out that it's a weak and slow car, even though it was never intended to be a fast one, and single out the weakest engine instead.
The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
- 3,158
- United Kingdom
- ask
I'm not even going to use the confused girl picture this time.
I just want you to know this is a really stupid post and if you're going to blame me for ruining this perfectly good thread you should blame yourself too
- 3,129
- Wise, VA
- Panoz-38
They got you dead to rights on this one @The87Dodge from these contradicting 2 posts.
Let's not make this thread's ant hill into a mountain.
Let's not make this thread's ant hill into a mountain.
The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
- 12,389
- Betelgeuse
- Beeblebrox_237
You've made at least one downright stupid statement in this thread. You shouldn't be at all surprised that you're getting bashed, particularly given that you have a history of entering into debates on this forum armed only with a fetish for awful Chrysler products.
- 5,885
- Canada
>Cherry-picks data because he feels like it
>Throws a tantrum when someone points that out
>Throws a tantrum when someone points that out
- 3,129
- Wise, VA
- Panoz-38
Some of the posts you have made lately has been on the defensive side in different subjects. It's not a bad idea to logoff for a few days to clear your head and mend your fences.
Just a friendly advice. 👍
- 3,200
- Murcie LP710
You derailed the thread by making your fingers type and then click the "Post Reply" button to two outlandish claims that had, as stated earlier, flawed logic.
It's not people disagreeing with an "opinion," it's people calling you out on it.
The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
I just wish some members on here can just keep their thoughts to themselves. IfI make a post that they think is wrong or has flawed logic, so what? No need to start flame comments about it, people.
- 3,158
- United Kingdom
- ask
There is so much irony in this statement, that I literally cringed.
- 34,821
- NoDak
- Cy-Fi
Report rejected. Disagreeing with something someone says is not an reportable offense.
That doesn't mean people can make unnecessary posts of a certain
Understand?
The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,189
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
- 84,466
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
You're complaining that people are saying negative things about your post, which itself was a negative - and cherry-picked - thing about something in someone else's post...
For some reason you're coming across as thinking that you are allowed to say negative things, but other people are not allowed to say negative things about the things you're saying. And now you're wasting our time with pointless reports about them.
Enough is enough.
