GTP vs. Wham - Last Year's Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel
  • 2,085 comments
  • 116,463 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Custom878
What happened?
Click to expand...
From what I (vaguely) remember, one or two of them called the other and played the song or something.
 
Jimlaad43
Nobody's taken the whamvatar's yet.
Click to expand...

fkxwd2.jpg
 
After Round One: TB-1, Pandora- 0. Round Two will be fought whenever Pandora feels like it.
 
TB
I'll be ready to swipe that one away, too. :p
Click to expand...
But what if you accidentally tap on it and open the app, causing you to get Whammed? :mischievous:
 
If you hear the instrumental of Last Christmas by Wham! but without the words, does it count?
 
Jahgee
If you hear the instrumental of Last Christmas by Wham! but without the words, does it count?
Click to expand...
You're supposed to keep listening. If it's Wham! Singing, then it counts.

Unless you mean there's a version without singing, in that case it shouldn't.
 
I'm going to be daring this year.

Me, the Christmas station, one hour, tomorrow.

May the odds indeed be ever in my favor.
 
TB
Then I shall don the Whamatar in shame, cursing my fat fingers.
Click to expand...
Personally I'd blame it on the small screen but that works too. :p
 
Dagger311
You're supposed to keep listening. If it's Wham! Singing, then it counts.

Unless you mean there's a version without singing, in that case it shouldn't.
Click to expand...
Almost every song has an instrumental version of it on the internet, I'm asking if hearing the song without the singers counts as hearing it in terms of this game
 
Jahgee
Almost every song has an instrumental version of it on the internet, I'm asking if hearing the song without the singers counts as hearing it in terms of this game
Click to expand...
I would assume no. It has to be the original release, not an instrumental. That's why you have to keep listening to tell if it has the vocals.
 
Not a day in?

I wonder if this can be the new Whreckord holder?
 
So much for no slow-chatting.

Oh well, I guess it's entertaining to read what some of you do to avoid getting Whammed!.
 
Well thank god I didn't get whammed...

6-7 hours ago, I was with my brother who was using an app called tunein (I think) , he was listening to some radio and then he decided to show me that app... he shows me almost every "music genres" radios and one of them was "Christmas genre radios" so I was like :sick: "I better run away or else I'm :censored:ed" so immediately when he selected a radio station...I just Ran out of the room and into downstairs pretending to have some important stuff to do (I actually do...)

Thank god that song was no near of that "last Christmas".

Next time I better stay off from anyone...even if he/she doesn't know what a wham! is...!
 
My dad plays Wham on the radio...

....Wham! - Everything She Wants precisely. Thank god Last Christmas isnt on his album for some reason.
 
W3HS
So much for no slow-chatting.

Oh well, I guess it's entertaining to read what some of you do to avoid getting Whammed!.
Click to expand...
I think it said less slow-chatting, not none at all? It is entertaining to read about the various strategies & antics.
I'm not sure exactly what counts as slow-chat so I'm trying to stay quieter than last year just to be on the safe side.
Except for this post. Does the response to shem's post qualify this one as meaningful & useful?
 
S_Bridge
I think it said less slow-chatting, not none at all? It is entertaining to read about the various strategies & antics.
I'm not sure exactly what counts as slow-chat so I'm trying to stay quieter than last year just to be on the safe side.
Except for this post. Does the response to shem's post qualify this one as meaningful & useful?
Click to expand...
Honestly, I thought it meant more fast chatting. :p
 
I just ignored that bit and kept posting crap whenever I wanted to :sly:
 
*get rid of this post - edit by me*
 
Last edited:
eg marg pli YouTube codes have become something of a second nature for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back