Enzo_P1_GTR
Premium
- 8,384

- Heaven
Nope still dont like them and never will.
my only hope is to not see one ugly standard car in gt6 ..
my only hope is to not see one ugly standard car in gt6 ..
I have a 47" LG and play in 1080p, and my reaction is obviously the opposite. In fact, the only cars I've been racing for the past two days are Standards.I was fine with standards until now. I've just got a new HDTV and the standards now look awful, I can't drive them now. The jaggies are what is hurting them, if they had smoother textures then they'd be a lot better looking.
Short answer: Nope.
Long answer: Because I had a rough idea of what we were getting coming in. From a visual standpoint, behind-the-curve models. Then the lack of customization (even compared to GT4) came out. Painting the cars does minimize the lack of aftermarket wheels, but it means I'm usually keeping Standards in stock trim, because they almost always look funny running a ton of power and lowered... on stock rims. People can bark about how GT's a simulator, and take it to the extreme by saying people who want visual modifications want to "NFS their rides"... but very few race cars I see, even amateur ones, look utterly stock. Ho hum.
Physics are definitely improved over GT4 (which, I mean, should be the case anyways). I want to spend some serious time with cars that have both Standard and Premium versions to see if the physics are in any way different. Though I guess if a Standard has a comparable Premium counterpart, why wouldn't it get a port-over of the associated variables?