Touring MarsNice work guys....!
JMX... some of your pics (esp. some of the B&W ones) are simply breath-taking...![]()
FWA2500
vingjmx, you got a gallery online somewhere wher we can browse your work?
jmx2222it's me again (this is one of my favorite threads BTW)
![]()
Master_YodaYou must rolls and rolls of film some were hiding in your house, those pics or so 🤬 good!
TEACH ME YOUR WAYS!
![]()
glubags
viXeN
Master Yoda
laudigtrs2Hi Guys
My Amuse S2000 Photos
laudigtrs2
mrploBesides that, JMX, yours are supurb.
mrploNo No No. Here's a quick question:
Which of these pictures are of high quality?
A) The First
B) The Second
C) The Third
D) None of the above
You know the answer to that.
People these images are not good enough. The have to be smooth. You should no be able to see blocks on the car or the background or the whole picture for that matter.
mrploBesides that, JMX, yours are supurb.
GlubagsPerhaps you missed the "experimentation" portion of my post. Perhaps you also missed the 3,000+ pixel width. I was attempting to take a few shots of the profile of a car and place them together to make a larger picture of the car than is possible using a single frame. That was the end result. Don't be a dick.
👎
Your exact statement was, "You should no be able to see blocks on the car." Have you even bothered looking at most of JMX's pictures? The gamma increase brings out the flaws in the "supurb" low-res textures like no other method. The Trial Celica serves a perfect example.
I'm sorry, but no you seem like a moron.![]()
jmx2222 some flaws could be fixed with some more PS work...otherwise to say someone his a moron...I don't know if that's ok