High Quality Images

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrplo
  • 110 comments
  • 5,168 views
ok a few things, jojoskates post your pics on one post, and fordgt150 make them smaller, use Thumbnail for Forums (1).

Thank you.
 
WOW. Look at all these people who are posting! Nice work to all, except please, please use imageshack. If you dont know how, ask around. People will help you.

Don't ask me as I will not be online for a while. Sorry.
 
Does this qualify? I know the background is blurred, but the quality on the car looks good to me.

 
pajerocathedralrockswf7tw.jpg
 
Nice work guys....!

JMX... some of your pics (esp. some of the B&W ones) are simply breath-taking... :boggled:
 
Touring Mars
Nice work guys....!

JMX... some of your pics (esp. some of the B&W ones) are simply breath-taking... :boggled:
Click to expand...

Thanx Mars :)
 
came out damn nice if i may say so, be sure to see the full-size version.....

 
jmx, you got a gallery online somewhere wher we can browse your work?
 
ving
jmx, you got a gallery online somewhere wher we can browse your work?
Click to expand...


sure ving...check bellow my signature :)
 
High resolution experimentation:



Click the picture if your browser automatically resizes it.
 
it's me again (this is one of my favorite threads BTW:))
jmxdoubletrialwf4sy.jpg
 
jmx2222
it's me again (this is one of my favorite threads BTW:))
jmxdoubletrialwf4sy.jpg
Click to expand...

You must rolls and rolls of film some were hiding in your house, those pics or so 🤬 good!

:bowdown: TEACH ME YOUR WAYS! :bowdown:
 
Master_Yoda
You must rolls and rolls of film some were hiding in your house, those pics or so 🤬 good!

:bowdown: TEACH ME YOUR WAYS! :bowdown:
Click to expand...

Master I can't teach you...YOU ARE THE MASTER :dopey: :dopey: :dopey: :dopey: :dopey: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :dopey: :dopey:
 
glubags
High resolution experimentation:



Click the picture if your browser automatically resizes it.
Click to expand...
viXeN
Does this qualify? I know the background is blurred, but the quality on the car looks good to me.

Click to expand...
Master Yoda
heres my fav pic.....
Click to expand...

No No No. Here's a quick question:

Which of these pictures are of high quality?

A) The First
B) The Second
C) The Third
D) None of the above

You know the answer to that.

People these images are not good enough. The have to be smooth. You should no be able to see blocks on the car or the background or the whole picture for that matter.

Besides that, JMX, yours are supurb.
 
how about these?
do they make the cut?



by the way, you will find that resized images such jmx's, or pictures where where the car takes up around 1/5 of the total picture size, will appear to be "higher quality" because the pixels are more condensed
 
mrplo
Besides that, JMX, yours are supurb.
Click to expand...


Thanx buddy :)

For some help go to my thread (check sig).
I wrote some down a few tips (sorry but you must search them)

greetz
jmx
 
mrplo
No No No. Here's a quick question:

Which of these pictures are of high quality?

A) The First
B) The Second
C) The Third
D) None of the above

You know the answer to that.

People these images are not good enough. The have to be smooth. You should no be able to see blocks on the car or the background or the whole picture for that matter.
Click to expand...


Perhaps you missed the "experimentation" portion of my post. Perhaps you also missed the 3,000+ pixel width. I was attempting to take a few shots of the profile of a car and place them together to make a larger picture of the car than is possible using a single frame. That was the end result. Don't be a dick.

👎




mrplo
Besides that, JMX, yours are supurb.
Click to expand...

Your exact statement was, "You should no be able to see blocks on the car." Have you even bothered looking at most of JMX's pictures? The gamma increase brings out the flaws in the "supurb" low-res textures like no other method. The Trial Celica serves a perfect example.

I'm sorry, but no you seem like a moron. :(
 
some flaws could be fixed with some more PS work...otherwise to say someone his a moron...I don't know if that's ok
 
Glubags
Perhaps you missed the "experimentation" portion of my post. Perhaps you also missed the 3,000+ pixel width. I was attempting to take a few shots of the profile of a car and place them together to make a larger picture of the car than is possible using a single frame. That was the end result. Don't be a dick.

👎






Your exact statement was, "You should no be able to see blocks on the car." Have you even bothered looking at most of JMX's pictures? The gamma increase brings out the flaws in the "supurb" low-res textures like no other method. The Trial Celica serves a perfect example.

I'm sorry, but no you seem like a moron. :(
Click to expand...




thats what did.... when I uploaded my image from my Flash Drive to my hard drive. then uploaded it threw ImageShack... made it bigger so you guys don't have small pic to look at....




jmx2222 some flaws could be fixed with some more PS work...otherwise to say someone his a moron...I don't know if that's ok
Click to expand...



I have nothing against you jmx2222 or anyone elese here... but mabe the only reason you agree with him because he is giving your photo shoped pics a 👍 and our (at least mine) untouched photos... that me make bigger for gtplanet a 👎
 
Hmm, looking back glubags is right. JMX has good photos, and much of the car is smooth, but the Civic is actually really low quality. Mabye JMX you could use photoshopt it increase blur, making it smoother, and increasing contrast. THen it will be high quality.

I was away, so I missed most of the previous posts. I may of missed JMX's, and just saw an earlier one.

Toodle oo
 
Back