High Quality Images

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrplo
  • 110 comments
  • 4,803 views
 
youve got to upload it......cant just link to an internal file on your HD.......


and mrplo......just curious how you like my Silvia?
 
My question is Mr Plo, who the hell are you to judge if a pic is high quality or not?

As far as I'm concerned, you have no reputation of a good photographer, or I missed a chapter.

GluBags is right.

As a matter of fact, I just looked at your example for a high quality picture, the RP92C, you call that high quality?

Look at the pavement, horrible.

The car is at 200+MPH, no blur?

C'me on, ask for others to do something you can atleast do.
 
heres one i took quite a while ago:


came out nice i think....was going rather fast there though

another:


just before launch to find its top speed.....270.38mph.....the same damn speed as all my other cars....
 
FWA2500
heres one i took quite a while ago:


came out nice i think....was going rather fast there though

another:


just before launch to find its top speed.....270.38mph.....the same damn speed as all my other cars....
nice pics Andres i really like the 300ZX (i'm sure it would the one i have in RL)



keep up the good HIGH quality images people 👍
 
Div is Back
...who the hell are you to judge if a pic is high quality or not?P
I'm not the judge. The general gtplanet.net public is the judge. Drifterxl asked. I'm merely giving suggestions. I'm no messaih. I don't control what people submit as of now. I have given advise on what look I belive to be high quality, and people disagree. What they think is high quality is usually high quality.
Div is Back
...the RP92C, you call that high quality?

Look at the pavement, horrible.

Read first post. It says 'may have a little bit of low quality'.

The Nissan R92CP picture:

Road=Below average
Car= Below average
Sky=Above average
Fence=Average
Trees=Good

Yes it was a bad example and I was meaning to remove it but I never got around to it :indiff:

Div is Back
As far as I'm concerned, you have no reputation of a good photographer...

Your right. I'm not much of photographer. Thats one of the reasons I started this thread to see how other people take nice, smooth pictures to learn from them.

Div is Back
C'me on, ask for others to do something you can atleast do.

I can so do them. Observe:
- The cliffs are a little blocky, but the car, trees, sky and ground are nice.
- Blurred, no low quality. Its alright if the images are blurred. Some images are better quality blurred, while others aren't
- Alot of people have said that their images are 'no modifications'. By all means. Post them. The above is un touched and all of the pictures I've posted. Its alright if you post them modified.
 
well if ur so damned about 3 pics, with BETTER quality then yours and you gave yours a tup but BETTER ones a BOO it makes no sense, please tell use what is wrong with my Spirra.
 
Here is my current best and favorite: it is the Aston Martin Vanquish if it is too dark to tell :indiff:



And these are some of my better ones as well:







All of these are COMPLETELY unedited. I think that is cheating :sly: (just kidding, JMX, your pics are fantastic! 👍 👍 )
 
Unfortunately, "High Quality" does not come as standard equipment in GT4. If you want TRUE high quality pics from it, you have to retouch. It is just the way it is in this version of the game. I mean, I will spend two hours alone fixing a car that has mad polygon problems.

Just look at the quality of the BMW in this image. Stock GT4 shot? I don't think so ... :) I spent like 3 hrs on the two ... removing GT4 poo poo...

 

Latest Posts

Back