Parnelli BoneThe mid-engined cars are by far the toughest to master in this game. In the original, the NSX was so twitchy and light, it was all I had just to keep the tires on the track... keeping them pointed consistantly was too much trouble. But hey, this is all part of the package: You'll never truely have 100% control over a fully-tuned NSX, it's supposed to be exciting..like an unruly horse. Before it's tuned, the NSX handles extremely well, though.
GTa great sportscar...it belongs do a dying breed of japenese performance sports cars....alas...
GThaven't you noticed? rx-7...gone, skyline...gone, supra....gone...new nsx...not that good....rx-8, nice car but no Rx-7...
plus it seems to me that the character of the great Japanese cars are gone, we're getting more and more of the same...
this is just my opinion, i'm just saying that the real performance machines are kinda disappearing, it's just too bad. nissan Z cant replace a skyline....3000GT...gone..
i could go on
GThaven't you noticed? rx-7...gone, skyline...gone, supra....gone...new nsx...not that good....rx-8, nice car but no Rx-7...
plus it seems to me that the character of the great Japanese cars are gone, we're getting more and more of the same...
this is just my opinion, i'm just saying that the real performance machines are kinda disappearing, it's just too bad. nissan Z cant replace a skyline....3000GT...gone..
i could go on
Parnelli BoneI don't know about the rest of the world but in America the SUV/Truck explosion has been a huge factor. It's really bad: on the way to work, you'll see all these dopes driving huge Ford Expeditons and Land Rovers by themselves, oblivious to the fact that in about 40 years all the fuel's gonna be gone. They don't car pool with other people so they mostly sit in traffic while the car pool lane is just about free for me to blast by them! Only young people tend to buy coupes nowadays. Mid-life Crisis dudes can be counted on the purchase Corvettes and 300ZX's, too.
Parnelli BoneTMM: you're right, the NSX is alot better than the MR2, i'm not doubting you there! I remember i was doing a qualifying run in the GT race series (not the World Cup) in an MR2 taht had Stage 3 weight reduction. I was at Trail Mountain and i actually lost control and spun out RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BACK STRAIGHT! I wasn't even cornering, the dang car couldn't handle bumps very well!
GThaven't you noticed? rx-7...gone, skyline...gone, supra....gone...new nsx...not that good....rx-8, nice car but no Rx-7...
plus it seems to me that the character of the great Japanese cars are gone, we're getting more and more of the same...
this is just my opinion, i'm just saying that the real performance machines are kinda disappearing, it's just too bad. nissan Z cant replace a skyline....3000GT...gone..
i could go on
Do you think you could sometime let a GV300 or two sit after you finish until all the AI cars come home, and then write down all their times?TMMI have learnt how to master the NSX, well it works for the NSX-R LM GT2 model. The trick is to accelerate through the corners, the car is much more stable in this maner. This does require braking hard before the corner to achieve a speed that you can then accelerate from whilst driving round the corner but it does also wear your tires thin although not as much as you might expect.
Don't brake into the corner as this makes the car very unstable, I did get away with it a couple of times racing GV300 and I did have to pit 4 times but I won the race by a clear margin and lapped upto 3rd.
This was racing against a Supra, a GTO TT and a GT-R, which on paper means I should have finished 4th.
TMMI have learnt how to master the NSX, well it works for the NSX-R LM GT2 model. The trick is to accelerate through the corners, the car is much more stable in this maner. This does require braking hard before the corner to achieve a speed that you can then accelerate from whilst driving round the corner but it does also wear your tires thin although not as much as you might expect.
Don't brake into the corner as this makes the car very unstable, I did get away with it a couple of times racing GV300 and I did have to pit 4 times but I won the race by a clear margin and lapped upto 3rd.
This was racing against a Supra, a GTO TT and a GT-R, which on paper means I should have finished 4th.
SportWagonDo you think you could sometime let a GV300 or two sit after you finish until all the AI cars come home, and then write down all their times?
I'm beginning to think perhaps the AI are a little faster in that race in the PAL version.
I have lots of samples from the North American game at
http://www.geocities.com/gt2toxs/gt/diary/1999-04-18.html#Grand_Valley_300_Results
etc.
It seems that each different AI car runs its own particular fairly consistent time in that race.
SportWagonActually, it would be interesting to me to see whether losing instead of winning appears to make any difference to the AI times. I did lose (come not first) a few times, and it didn't appear to me that it slowed the cars down. In contrast, it was clear in GT2 that there was some sort of significant rubber-banding in the enduroes.
Maybe start a new thread and post them.
"GV300 finishing time analysis" or something.
I realized I have a summary GT1 Enduro log here...
http://www.geocities.com/gt2toxs/gt/logs/gt1enduro.txt
crosstrainerThe NSX handles better in later GT games. agree? disagree?
Parnelli BoneI don't know what happens in GT3 and 4, but in gT2 the intro of the limited-slip differentials make a world of difference in the taming of the NSX. For high-powered mid engine cars i like experimenting with the active stability control device, too.
TMMIn GT1 the LSD & SCD were automatic so either they got it wrong or maybe they removed it to create a better driving expereince. So I believe anyway.
Parnelli BoneI see. Well i like setting up my own differentials. It jsut adds to the realism.
SportWagonI think the NSX's in GT1 also tended to suffer from bouncing unless you managed to balance the suspension nicely. That is, more so than most cars, and with more disastrous results.