How do Spacecraft turn in space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sureboss
  • 21 comments
  • 1,218 views

Sureboss

Tanned and Lipstick'd
Premium
Messages
15,504
United Kingdom
UK
My understanding of how a plane turns is that it changes the direction of the flow of air, right? Or makes it stronger on one side of the craft.

So given that a spacecraft is in space with no air, how does it turn?
 
Manoeuvrable rocket nozzels nudge them in the right direction with quick bursts.
 
My understanding of how a plane turns is that it changes the direction of the flow of air, right? Or makes it stronger on one side of the craft.

So given that a spacecraft is in space with no air, how does it turn?

"Every action has an equal and opposite reaction".

Fuel exits the craft, by way of flame, at 5m/s and the craft moves the other way at 5m/s.
 
Although there is no air, rockets can turn the aircraft. They have them at different places on the shuttle. They use short bursts of rocket power to turn one way then they have to use short bursts on the other side to counter the movement.
 
Yup even with no air a force is being generated by the jets so it moves...t takes just a tiny bit to move the ship loads!

Its like a spaceman kicking off from the side of the ship, he moves away so if the jets are 'kicking away' from the ship the ship moves..
 
Interestingly, if an astronaut pushes himself away from the spaceship, the ship itself will accelerate in the opposite direction by a tiny amount (unlikely to even be noticeable to anyone in the spaceship). It will move far less than the astronaut because the action is controlled by the equation force = mass times acceleration. Force is the same for both, so the smaller mass will have greater acceleration.

Aeroplanes also change their vector by thrust as well as aerodynamic pressure. When you point the nose of an airplane in a different direction it means you are also pointing the thrust from the engines in a different direction. The engines will push the plane in whatever direction it is facing, and rockets on spaceships do the same thing.

Also, the F-22 Raptor is an example of an aeroplane which uses its thrust to change bearing. It can move its engine nozzles up or down in order to change the way its facing rather than just relying on aerodynamic pressure on the control surfaces. Another more obvious example of thrust vectoring on an aeroplane is the Hawker Harrier, which can manoeuvre at slow speeds by rotating its engine nozzles, without needing any assistance from its aerodynamic control surfaces at all, making it probably the best illustration of how a spaceship manoeuvres without looking at the spaceship itself. Alternatively, look at those odd fan boats that are popular in the Everglades. They rely on thrust vectoring alone to change direction.
 
Manoeuvrable rocket nozzels nudge them in the right direction with quick bursts.
As seen on the shuttle

250px-Shuttle_front_RCS.jpg


And also in tactical applications at very high speeds...
aka VIFFing.
 
Another more obvious example of thrust vectoring on an aeroplane is the Hawker Harrier, which can manoeuvre at slow speeds by rotating its engine nozzles, without needing any assistance from its aerodynamic control surfaces at all, making it probably the best illustration of how a spaceship manoeuvres without looking at the spaceship itself.

The North American X-15 research plane literally uses rockets for the same purpose. However, the science of thrust vectoring is quite prominent on the Harrier, more than that of the new X-35B.
 
"Every action has an equal and opposite reaction".

Fuel exits the craft, by way of flame, at 5m/s and the craft moves the other way at 5m/s.

Not quite, since we are looking at forces and not velocity :sly:
 
Wow you people are definitely going to help me with my physics homework next semester,lol
 
Haha, just ask and I'll try to help. Physics is fun and rather straight forward once you get the basic ideas down.
 
Those little rocket motors are called a Reaction Control System. Any aircraft flying above a certain altitude needs them for control, because as others said the atmosphere becomes too thin for normal control surfaces to work. Now, space craft don't usually make turns in space, because changing orbit requires a lot of fuel. Once the Shuttle is launched into its orbit it is basically stuck in that orbital path till it comes back down. Only a few types of satellites have the ability to make major changes their orbital direction, and those are spy and mapping satellites. Also the Hubble space telescope can make large changes to its position. Now, to actually go higher requires a lot of fuel, more so than the Shuttle carries. In fact, the Shuttle can only go around 300 miles high. Oh, and yes, rockets do use a form of thrust vectoring called a gimbaled engine, where the whole rocket motor and nozzle are mounted on hydraulic actuators, which can move the whole system several degrees in any direction.
http://sscfreedom.ssc.nasa.gov/esd/images_sscptd/ssc_projects/ssme/night_gimballing.mpg <- vid of a SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine)
 
It's not exactly rocket science...
This is true...

The forces are equal, not the velocities :dopey:

Actually, it's EXACTLY Rocket Science, at it's most basic. It's absolutely the way rockets move.

Kind of neat, all this talk of thrust vectoring and action/reaction. The easiest way of demonstrating this is using the elastic tension in a blown-up balloon as fuel, and letting it go. as a bonus, you see what uncontrolled thrust vectoring is like. :3
 
My understanding of how a plane turns is that it changes the direction of the flow of air, right? Or makes it stronger on one side of the craft.

So given that a spacecraft is in space with no air, how does it turn?

This is really two questions. How does the spacecraft "change direction" seems to imply to me that it heads off somewhere else - which would require a sizeable rocket engine. But there is another problem here - attitude control. On an aircraft, the control surfaces are used to pitch, yaw, and roll an aircraft while the main engines are used to send it where it's trying to get to. There is an analogous situation with spacecraft. There is a main engine that is used to send it on it's way, and there is a reaction control system used to impart pitch, yaw, and roll (if you will) to the spacecraft so that it orients the main engine properly before firing. These two systems typically use different kinds of propellant. The RCS (reaction control system) is a series of strategically placed nozzles around the spacecraft so that they can achieve the desired attitude. These typically use cold gas, because very little velocity change is required to change attitude. In general, spacecraft teams keep track of both reaction control fuel and main engine fuel. Running out of either one is bad.
 
Thanks. Been watching a bit of Red Dwarf....
Not exactly a documentary is it?

Really, their explanation of stasis in The End should tell you exactly how much science they use.
 
"Every action has an equal and opposite reaction".

Fuel exits the craft, by way of flame, at 5m/s and the craft moves the other way at 5m/s.
I thought it simply discharged gas without burning it.

It's called a Reaction Control System, and the Space Shuttle's thrusters use helium as the propellant. Not only is it inert like nitrogen, but it makes the shuttle lighter as well. An I'll be damned if that's not one of the most obviously logical things I've ever heard in my life.

RCS.

I can't find any videos of it in use, though I've seen them blowing white smoke on TV bunches of times.

The Wiki says that some other vehicles use arcjets, ion thrusters, Hall-effect thrusters and momentum wheels. Sounds like stuff out of Star Trek.

EDIT: Tree'd, like, 15 times.
 
Back