"I could care less..."

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kent
  • 43 comments
  • 2,082 views
"I dont give a Sh.." Gotta love it hehe.

'I couldn't give two sh..s less about what so&so says....'

My own personal favorite. But I could care less.....is bothersome. I couldn't care less. I used to say the first one, but have since caught myself on few occasions....and have since been correcting every one on the difference between the two.
 
As long as you realise that the phrase "I could care less" is a lot more accurate than "I couldn't care less".

If you "couldn't care less" then the thing your commenting on has to be the one thing in your entire life that you care the least about. You can't not care less about more than one thing. But if you could say "I could care less" your basically saying your not bothered, if you thought about it you could care less about it but your arn't bothered thinking about it.

It makes no difference which one people use to me.

Sorry Dave A but I disagree on this one. I couldn't care less, suggests; not I have no knowledge therefore incapable of forming an opinion. It suggest I have no preferance whatsoever I genuinly do not care. For example if I couldn't care less who wins a football match my level of care is at a zero value, I have no preferance whatsoever, this is the same level of care as ignorance of something. If no care means a zero value, then no knowledge can only be a zero value. You cannot care less than zero, unless you have a negative care. :lol:

I get your point though, while you may not knowledgably have a preferance, your mind may have a subconcious preferance, perhaps one has a better sounding name for example but this is really clutching at straws, since it is after all a figure of speech. So really I couldn't care should only be used when you genuinley don't care but I still maintain it is the correct terminology. 👍

So then what about 'I could care less', this is no use as a phrase whatsoever, it can only be understood once it has context e.g 'I could care less but it is unlikely'. Now it is useful as a phrase, since we have an indication of how much you could care.

If I just said 'I could care less' it suggests nothing, you could car less than what? how do you judge what they care less than, it is very much ambigious. e.g 'I could care less who wins the football tonight' suggest you care somewhat, but the extent at to which you care is unknown and thus is useless.

On the topic of annoying phrases, what about 'all of a sudden', the reason why I say this is because you can't have 'half of a sudden' or 'most of a sudden' so why not just have 'suddenly':dunce:
 
^---- What he said. It’s very easy to care zero about multiple things. That’s all “I couldn’t care less” means – that your care is at zero.
 
G.T
Another good example is "could of" and "should of". It should be "could have" and "should have". Another example of spelling the words on how you say them, except this one is definitely WRONG and annoys me to no end ever since I was told this at College a few years back.

they're not saying 'could of', they're saying 'could've', which is the contraction of 'could have'.
 
they're not saying 'could of', they're saying 'could've', which is the contraction of 'could have'.
Yep, but I'm not sure with your accents whether "ve" or "of" sounds different when you say them. There's quite a difference here, and more than likely people clearly say "of" more than anything. I presume because it's a little easier to say than "ve".

My example did mainly mean during written work, but thinking about it, verbal and and especially written examples can annoy me sometimes.
 
First of all, the first post I made in here (the one you quoted) isn't well put together and does have a good number of holes in it. The second one is more along the lines of what I'm actually trying to say.

I get your point though, while you may not knowledgably have a preferance, your mind may have a subconcious preferance, perhaps one has a better sounding name for example
So you admit that regardless of how little that care maybe, there is always an element of care involved. The simple fact that you've taken the time to think about it shows a level of care you've given to the subject regardless of how small that thought might have been. The ONLY way you literally couldn't care less is if it's something you hadn't even thought about, ever.

but this is really clutching at straws, since it is after all a figure of speech.
As I said earlier, as a figure of speech I have no problem with it, but in terms of factual correctness "I could care less" is actually more factually correct. I'm not saying you should use one and not the other, frankly it doesn't bother me which people use. Just that the one some people claim is innaccurate, is actually the one that is more accurate when literal meanings are being used. Regardless of how helpful you find the information contained in the comment to be, I could care less is more true than I couldn't care less.

So then what about 'I could care less', this is no use as a phrase whatsoever, it can only be understood once it has context e.g 'I could care less but it is unlikely'. Now it is useful as a phrase, since we have an indication of how much you could care.
Now this I dissagree on, my take on the phrase "I could care less" geenrally means that if you were willing to think about it some more, you could explain why you could care less (either verbally or in your mind it doesn't matter), but you don't care enough to think about it any more which automatically puts it very low down in your care-o-meter, it doesn't put it at zero, but it puts it low down. Ofcourse, that's my take on it, and it is a correct interpritation provided that it was said with that meaning in mind, but I think most people that say it mean that they don't care much. So in terms of facts, it's far more accurate than the other saying.

If I just said 'I could care less' it suggests nothing, you could car less than what? how do you judge what they care less than, it is very much ambigious. e.g 'I could care less who wins the football tonight' suggest you care somewhat, but the extent at to which you care is unknown and thus is useless.
Which is true, you do care somewhat about the match, you've thought about it. You've given time to that thought regardless of how much or how little. That in itself is a level of care that you've taken regarding the subject.

As I said before though, I don't really care what is used.
 
As I said before though, I don't really care what is used.

Well I could care less, read into to that what you like.:lol:

I get what you mean, I can see for you it is not an issue because clearly since people around you use that phrase, you already have an understanding of what context they mean it in. For me I don't recall ever hearing anybody say 'I could care less' I therefore have very little idea of how they intend me to interpret it. The first time I have come across this is on the thread.

I would still disagree with you, about I couldn't care less being inaccurate, if you do not have a conscious preference and need to access you subconscious mind to decide if you do have slight preference then you are looking into things to much.

either way I will settle that we are just looking at things from different directions and leave it at that. 👍

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!































Finaly somebody else who understands. It bothers me SO MUCH!

Thank you for clearing that up. :dunce:
 
Finaly somebody else who understands. It bothers me SO MUCH!

Indifferent2.gif


having "OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in size 7 font bothers me even more.
 
I get what you mean, I can see for you it is not an issue because clearly since people around you use that phrase, you already have an understanding of what context they mean it in.
Tbh I failed to notice what people around me use. It's just something that doesn't bother me, either way I know what they mean without having to think about it. I'm not going to deny that I'm reaching out too far than this topic really calls for, I'm reaching as far as I think you can on the matter. It really doesn't matter to me at the end of the day, I'm simply talking in ultimates if both are taken on face value for their literal meanings. I wouldn't expect people to change because of that, I don't want them to, it's just when the one that is imo more accurate in literal meaning is called inaccurate I like to argue against the grain on this matte 👍.
 
Back