What
milefile is saying is perfectly valid.
Anybody who knows anything can tell you that comparisons, by definition, are relative. You're comparing A to B. In this thread,
milefile is comparing the F090/S to the other F1 cars. He has a perfectly valid opinion. Even if you don't agree with him, his position can be easily backed up. The F090/S has 104 HP less than any other F1 car. They all weigh the same, but the F090/S has between 15% and 34% less power than all the others.
Sure, you can easily say the F090/S is still a good car. Every F1 car is much better than every other car. The only non-F1 cars I've ever heard of winning the Formula GT are the R390 and the 787B, and the only way they can possibly win is by running harder tires than F1 cars are allowed to use and pitting less.
Originally posted by Rice Rocketeer
Not many of our newer members have driven the F1s yet and for you to flat out and say the F090/s is a piece of crap (for the lack of a better word...) is unfair to the newbies. How about you let them decide instead of you making a useless thread for the sole purpose of instilling your personal preferences into others?
These are some extremely strange statements. Why are you so concerned about what impression newer members get of the F090/S? If you look around the board, you will get the clear idea that any F1 car can win any race it can enter, most by a huge margin. It has been seen many times that people who don't want a challenge will just run Super Speedway Endurance until they get the F090/S. I don't see any evidence of new members getting the wrong idea about the F090/S.
If you're going to start bítching about every thread where people talk about their personal preferences, you've really got your work cut out for you, so I'll let you get to it!
