You assume too much my friend. I'm not poo-pooing shuffle at all, just offering up my honest opinion. It's good, it's fun, but like a lot of GT it has unrealized potential for greatness with just some small tweaking. I shuffled quite a bit the last year of GT and was in well run shuffle rooms when I did so. One thing you learn when you drive a ton of cars like I did in GT5 was that every car has a limit of performance and many of them are seconds apart when tuned, and further apart when not tuned, often due to poor stock gearboxes and balance/rotation issues. I did enjoy many shuffle races but it was always frustrating to be the guy ending up in the Aristo when 7 other guys ended up in Impreza's, Evo's and Elises. A very bad driver in an Elise or Impreza will waltz away from a very good driver in an Aristo any day
Qualifying..not available in shuffle.
Wouldn't this be more a function of accurate PP, or rather because the PP system is unfunctional?
The PP-values are off for a lot of cars, but PPs can never deliver an even spread of cars on any track. PPs should reflect a car's laptime on an "average" circuit, but apparently are currently calculated by a formula only. But even if you had such optimal PP-values for each car, you could not expect the cars to be even on High Speed Ring and Autumn Ring at the same time.
You think racing soft tires makes for less Turn One Drama?Didn't have racing softs in shuffle.
Second, is all the people who falsely believe that running stock cars shows true skill. No, it just shows the skill for those who have taken the time to learn how those stock cars drive and those who learn how to drive ill handling cars. If all you ever do is drive stock tuned cars, just like a personal tune, you eventually learn how to get the most out of that stock tune.
I'll never get why stuff like this is so popular. To me, running random stock cars is about the most boring thing one could do on one of these games. In Forza, they have a custom stock hopper racing that everyone raves about. The Shuffle races sound alot like that. First, I hate any system that tells me what I'm going to race and where I'm going to race. I like picking my own cars and tracks if I'm hosting. Second, is all the people who falsely believe that running stock cars shows true skill. No, it just shows the skill for those who have taken the time to learn how those stock cars drive and those who learn how to drive ill handling cars. If all you ever do is drive stock tuned cars, just like a personal tune, you eventually learn how to get the most out of that stock tune.
I guess I get that it's simple and easy and quick. If that's what's important to people then fair enough. But to me that's just playing half the game.
Driving skill is driving skill. If you need a specific car or tune, you have narrowed your skill profile. To borrow your comment: 'No, it just shows the skills for those who have taken the time to learn how to drive cars that are tuned to death and handle the same." And need racing softs.
I am planning on joining you all, in GT5 my profile is KOR_Kaine. I miss my shuffle.
You think racing soft tires makes for less Turn One Drama?
So I guess there is no test of skill at all. In any set up.
Because it's always going to be who practices what, or who tunes the best, or who spends the most time on tuning, or who likes a particular type of car... or what upgrades are allowed, or if the people know the car stock, or if whatever...
I guess there's no point to race at all.
I'm just kidding here.
Obviously this is a matter of personal opinion & taste about what's a challenge and what's fun.
But of course nobody can ever admit that what they like isn't "The Only Right Thing".
*Sigh*
Yes, yes it is flawed to think that anything is more "skill" than another, just because whatever...I said it was flawed to think that one way shows more skill than the other. Seems people take offense to that which probably means it was dead on accurate.
I think In Real Life this would be quite dangerous.I have never watched a real race of any importance where drivers are struggling for grip on crappy street tires and drifting corners. Just doesn't happen.
Sometimes I just love the sim racing crowd. Seems they want to sim everything BUT what real race drivers do and think. You've both have made my point with your responses. Driving skill is driving skill. That much is correct. But that's not what I said. I said it was flawed to think that one way shows more skill than the other. Seems people take offense to that which probably means it was dead on accurate.
The racing soft thing I guess is supposed to be some kind of shot at me because I dared question the stock elitism (excuses). It seems to be that many here believe that only noobs run racing tires. Personally, I see it as completely opposite. I have never watched a real race of any importance where drivers are struggling for grip on crappy street tires and drifting corners. Just doesn't happen. The driving I see done by virtual drivers with race tires on is so much closer to what I see real drivers doing in real races it's shouldn't even be a discussion. Much less all the corner drifting I see in the TT's. Yes some of that is to do with SRF being on....but alot of it is the silly tires that invite you to powerslide the corners.
Sometimes I just love the sim racing crowd. Seems they want to sim everything BUT what real race drivers do and think. You've both have made my point with your responses. Driving skill is driving skill. That much is correct. But that's not what I said. I said it was flawed to think that one way shows more skill than the other. Seems people take offense to that which probably means it was dead on accurate.
The racing soft thing I guess is supposed to be some kind of shot at me because I dared question the stock elitism (excuses). It seems to be that many here believe that only noobs run racing tires. Personally, I see it as completely opposite. I have never watched a real race of any importance where drivers are struggling for grip on crappy street tires and drifting corners. Just doesn't happen. The driving I see done by virtual drivers with race tires on is so much closer to what I see real drivers doing in real races it's shouldn't even be a discussion. Much less all the corner drifting I see in the TT's. Yes some of that is to do with SRF being on....but alot of it is the silly tires that invite you to powerslide the corners.
Most definitly it's a function of the PP system but there are other issues and there are work-arounds. Just giving Shuffle hosts many of the same parameters to work with as any other lobby host, would fix many of them. 4wd's too fast at 420PP? No problem, toggle 4wd's off. Elise's too fast at a given PP? No problem, toggle MR's off. Mix of tires at 400 PP? No problem, toggle on SH for everyone. Want everyone in a 4wd...toggle on only 4wd's. IMO these small changes that are already in the game would make it dramatically better.Wouldn't this be more a function of accurate PP, or rather because the PP system is unfunctional?
So what's it like going back to GT 5 after 6?
Pretty seamless? Or jarring?
Literally, I never even heard about shuffle mode until GT 6 and all the people complaining it was missing...
Well don't it always seem to go, that you don't know whatcha got til its gone, I'd gladly pay a fee, to put up a shuffle lot. Lol good songI guess it's true what they say, you don't realise what you have until it's gone.
So what's it like going back to GT 5 after 6?
Pretty seamless? Or jarring?
I was wondering just that, thanks. About looking better, GT 5 also seems to have deeper color contrasts from the compare videos... I think that "50% increase in contrast and HDR" GT 6 advertised is likely only in photo mode...First time, I noticed how simple the physics model seemed in comparison to GT6. Apart from that; GT5 has better frame rates, looks better graphically because of better Anit-Aliasing, & Shuffle was a lot of fun too. No bugs when viewing the replays afterwards either. Menu's are slower, but that never bothered me much anyway.
I think GT6 physics are superior, but GT5 is the far better game overall at this point in time imo. I may change my mind after a year or so of GT6 updates though.
Well don't it always seem to go, that you don't know whatcha got til its gone, I'd gladly pay a fee, to put up a shuffle lot. Lol good song
So what do we think the chances are that PD will patch shuffle into GT6? 50%? More / less?