Christian_C
Premium
- 1,499
- Stoke, UK
- GTP_Christian_C
Lancia.
As they were pre 1994.
No one can argue with that surely?
As they were pre 1994.
No one can argue with that surely?
Have you been in a Cadillac recently? The luxury/build quality today is leaps & bounds ahead of what they were 5 years ago.
Obviously Delorean.![]()
Lancia.
As they were pre 1994.
No one can argue with that surely?
I'll go a different direction: Oldsmobile
In its glory days, Oldsmobile was the cooler cousin of Buick, like Pontiac... But with a real job. Although Buick is doing a commendable job walking the entry-level-luxury line, their vehicles are not particularly exciting to drive, and do not appeal directly to younger people. A new Oldsmobile would need to offer a reasonable amount of luxury at a fair price, while still keeping the "fun to drive" ideals in tact. We'd need a four-model strategy:
1) Super 88: Bring over the Chevrolet Caprice Royale V8 from the Middle-East, don't offer any options on the car, and make it $45K, exactly where the Hyundai Genesis is.
2) Cutlass: Use the Alpha chassis from beneath the Cadillac ATS, offer only the 2.5L I4 or the 2.0T with the six-speed automatic. Keep options to a minimum, price it out the door from $28-32K
3) Toronado: Go for more of the '80s vibe, make it a small sports coupe based on the ideals of the 140R Concept by Chevrolet. Swoopy coupe with turbo power. Again, minimize the options, price it out the door for about $25K.
...a wildcard?
4) Starfire, basically a Toronado convertible. A hard-top convertible. One engine and transmission offered, same limits on options, $28K.
They made one model and it was a mechanical nightmare.
Then John DeLorean was charged with drug trafficking and other offences. £10 million of taxpayers' money went missing, I heard.
Endless-WilsoWell what do you expect from a start up company they didnt have alot of money to work with off the bat. it took almost 4 years to engineer the Delorean and then had the Irish build it. all the money went in to development , i mean Loutus did the final design and stainlees steel aint cheap.
The whole thing with drugs was and FBI sting basically they framed him.
They made one model and it was a mechanical nightmare.
Then John DeLorean was charged with drug trafficking and other offences. £10 million of taxpayers' money went missing, I heard.
MG.
Why? They were a simple little British car Manufacturer who built some of the best cars of the 80's like the Midget
Well, I can't choose. No really, I want: TVR, MG, Triumph, Pontiac, and Saab.
I meant the old MG. Not the MG where there cars were Rovers with the badges swapped.MG aren't dead anymore. http://mg.co.uk//
They're now Chinese owned, but all of the design and engineering work is still done at Longbridge in Birmingham, therefore they are still mostly British. The latest rumour is that they've got a new sports car in the pipeline. 👍
Dooglers8Yes, yes, yes! They should have killed off Buick instead. Oldsmobile was quirky and neat, kind of like Saturn, which I also like for those qualities. But Buick is just, meh, so boring, and I like a lot of boring cars.Their current styling language is so un-distinctive and forgettable, and they aren't very photogenic either. I saw a new Verano on Youtube, and I thought it looked so bland. I saw it in real life, and I thought it looked kind of nice. Not so good. But Oldsmobile, they had their own distinct styling language, they had the Aurora, and they seemed to actually be different than the other GM cars, unlike Buick, a rebadged Chevrolet. Same goes for Pontiac, it was just rebadged garbage in later years, and frankly, the only Pontiac I ever liked was the Firebird. Maybe they could make Pontiac a special, small brand for performance vehicles in the future. I'd like that.
Why look at the the Buick Skylark, Buick GNX, Buick GSX, Buick LeSabre Etc. The same for the Oldsmobile look at the Cutlass, 442, Etc. you gotta know what your talking about. They should have kept the classics and just updated like they did with Chevy, Ford, and Dodge why would you kill off either.
You mean the 3.5L?Most car brands died for a reason. Not all of them good and not all of them fair.
But it's a crime that TVR isn't around. Griffith. Cerbera. Chimera. Tuscan. V8S.
On a tangent, I want the Rover V8 engine back.
YSSMANThey tried to do that...
GM phased a good number of these vehicles in and out over time with varying success. Part of the problem was that, while they may have stuck with some of the original's ideas, it was never enough to actually take it back to the good-ol-days.
The brands died because they no longer had a place in the market. The same goes with Plymouth and Mercury. Whereas they were brands that showed you were moving up in the world, lines were becoming blurred with so many models moving up and down market, new brands coming into the fold, and expanded competition from foreign makes.
Lancia.
As they were pre 1994.
No one can argue with that surely?
and Pontiac is one of GM's oldest and most storied brands.
It would be really interesting to see what a modern day AMC Javelin would like. Or a Pacer, or a Gremlin, or a Matador, or basically everything else they made, for that matter. And by interesting I mean awesome.a
Pontiac didn't exist until 1926, Oldsmobile and Buick were the oldest(but Olds was slightly older), and Chevrolet and Oldsmobile are the most storied.
It would be a bad fuel injected system that uses more fuel than an old carbie and the car will be riddled with electrical faults.