- 1,653

- UK
- JacksHereR
Before you create a thread, come over to my thread and shower praise on my lap3 whining threads left until I create a praising thread...
I regret not putting 'I've had it with this track' as the title instead
Before you create a thread, come over to my thread and shower praise on my lap3 whining threads left until I create a praising thread...
I bought PS1, PS2 and PS3 because of Gran Turismo. Why does this bother you so?
A: If you buy the console for one game and don't like that game, it makes sense to sell it if you're the type that doesn't like unnecessary stuff laying around the house. I sell or give away perfectly good stuff all the time to avoid clutter.The fact that he bought a console for a single game doesn't bother me, I'm mostly cool with that, though I didn't phrased it correctly.
What bothers me is that he straight up sold the console because, for him, GTS sucked.
I mean, come on, GTS is not the only great game exclusive for PS4 that is interesting, right on the top of my head I can remember the incoming God of War 4, The Last of Us 2, Days gone and Horizon Zero Down.
I think OP just created this thread to get some attention, since we have a proper whinning thread for that(that apparently everyone ignores).
Come back in 5 years and maybe some of the simple bugs have been fixed and there will be 2 new tracks.
/beingrealistic
I'll keep playing for now until the Wipeout VR patch comes out.
so tell me how realistic you’re being if we got 1 track a month after release?
haha wait you’re not being realistic
I'm not young or naive, but that is exactly what I did. Worth every penny!Buying a PS4 Pro purley for a Gran Turismo game, and in this case GT Sport
You must be very young and naive.
OP, as you can see, you’re not allowed to make threads expressing disappointment about GTS.
A combination of 2 tracks is not a new track. What's next, Northern Isle speedway in reverse?
it's been 3 months now to add 1 track variation. At this pace it's going to be like GT6, empty promises. But the Samba bus is fun in vr, not kidding.
Yeah, sure, in the most literal sense you can think for the wordOP's post stands, and is open... HOW exactly are they "not allowed" to make threads about this?
![]()
They appear to be equally advanced as an open, easy to pick up sim, just like Forza. I would say they're pretty even in that regard really. For some, it's not all about physics, for some it is. In the end, it's all up to the user how they perceive it. Everything you've listed is things you're ok with, yet, what does that matter to the op?I dont really understand your issues. I have scoured these forums and understand most peoples complaints about the game. Most range from unfounded- reasonable complaints about how the specific aspects of first gen. SR system works but no one out there seems to be able to provide an example of a game that does it better (iRacing has its own major SR flaws) The physics are beat by ONLYT WO other games (AC and PC2) Everything else is minor gripes about how GTS isnt PERFECT. The game still gets updated semi- monthly and we are all (patiently?) waiting for more content to be added.
Oh there's someone that has no idea about something, definitelyUnless you were one of the people affected by the grip bug or in contention for the number one on the dailies charts then who cares. You have NO IDEA if this affected you.
What doesn't make sense is that you've latched on to one tiny aspect and assumed that was the only reason.You bought and sold a PS4 Pro and GTS and quit because the online lobbies make you press R1 twice before racing? HOW ASININE. Am i supposed to go "Oh yeah that makes sense!" or are you just that picky? Please tell me because that is probably the worst reason for wasting your money than anything.
I wont have a PS4, or GTS, for about a month or two. I've been here since 2011 and haven't owned a PS3 since just about 2012-2013 and haven't owned a GT game since GT5. There's a lot more valuable area's in this forum than the GT section of it, and there's a lot of wonderful people out there too, outside of this section. If you haven't noticed, there is a lot more to this forum. I'd recommend exploring it.Just curious, but if you don't like the game or have any other reason to own a PS4, why do you keep coming back here?
Eh, not necessarily. It makes it a new layout, or ribbon, but I wouldn't really call it a new trackwere we able to drive on the combination of tracks BEFORE the update?
if the answer is no, then it’s a new track
Yep. It's a pretty common thing here in the GTS subfourm, and unless you're positive, some will slay you like a dragon if negative towards their beloved game.OP, as you can see, you’re not allowed to make threads expressing disappointment about GTS.
OP, as you can see, you’re not allowed to make threads expressing disappointment about GTS.
Yeah, sure, in the most literal sense you can think for the wordI mean I don't care for these kinds of thread as I don't really see why it needed it's own, but it's completely ironic seeing the reactions and things people are saying here. What's sad is that this user wasn't really even bashing the game, and was posting in a perfectly peaceful manner and that seemed to be enough for some to personally go after the person. Some people just like to say bye to a community that they probably enjoyed being a part of at one point, and while it could have done without being it's own thread, the person wasn't really offensive in any way.
It's also a bit ironic that you even put that question out there, if you even looked at the thread![]()
If that's what you think then you're getting overly offended at something as simple as a smiley face. Condescending, no, but I was definitely having a laugh at that statement, especially after reviewing the thread. It is literally open and allowed, in the sense that we can reply to it and aren't being stopped, but it's not so allowed given the general tone of the thread, and how hes getting attacked for it(even if we aren't being stopped.) However, I reiterate that I still don't think it needed its own thread, really. Yeah, hes incorrect, when using the most literal form of the word, that of which I laughed at.I'm pleased to bring laughter into your life, though I suspect it's not genuine and done for the reason of being patronising and condescending.
Mods and admins say what's allowed, I see none of them saying that this thread is not "allowed", OP put his opinion out there, the discussion so far is open... therefore Masterweasels post is factually incorrect.
OP's post stands, and is open... HOW exactly are they "not allowed" to make threads about this?
![]()
If that's what you think then you're getting overly offended at something as simple as a smiley face.
Condescending, no, but I was definitely having a laugh at that statement, especially after reviewing the thread. It is literally open and allowed, in the sense that we can reply to it and aren't being stopped, but it's not so allowed given the general tone of the thread, and how hes getting attacked for it(even if we aren't being stopped.) However, I reiterate that I still don't think it needed its own thread, really. Yeah, hes incorrect, when using the most literal form of the word, that of which I laughed at.
Whoops, forgot to put this at the end:
/s
It's all situational. You said nothing wrong to me, I was just laughing because it really seems like the opposite of what you've stated. If I was being condescending, I would have been a lot more blunt, and probably wouldn't have explained my point of view.I'm not offended, it's my opinion of you based on your posting style. If that wasn't the sentiment, then I happily stand corrected.