Oh my god!!!! Lucky lucky lucky person. Have fun with that mate.
That's just how the software works. For example, it only checks avatar sizes when someone uploads a new one - it doesn't check each user's avatar size against their new user group when they are demoted (and yes, it's the same with the signatures for older users). Other privileges which are determined dynamically with each page load can more easily be "revoked".Why limit the post count per page for ex-premium members, though, when there are several other options that persist after the membership expires?
I just dicovered that...i'm not premium but i can still view 100 posts per page...hmmm.
This came as a shock but...realy...when you face the facts mods... there is no need to change it.![]()
đź’ˇ
It appears your settings are configured to view more than 20 posts per page - an option which is only available to Premium users. You can upgrade your account or adjust the settings on the options page.
( Btw, since when is that 20 posts / page rule for non premium members valid ? )
I don't see the point of changing it from 20 as it completely screws up the google search box on multipage threads.100 posts per page
For what it's worth I've never used more than 20 per page, ever.
I don't see the point of changing it from 20 as it completely screws up the google search box on multipage threads.
DukeFor what it's worth I've never used more than 20 per page, ever.
As far as I know, it's been there since the beginning.
Go Premium and you get no ads, red bold username, a bigger PM box, 100 posts per page (if you want it), bigger avatars, limited moderation ability on your own threads, more space for uploads and access to the as-yet-not-renamed-on-that-page Infield forum.
Stop being Premium and you lose that - except your avatar won't revert until the next time you change it and, until yesterday, everyone enjoyed 100 posts per page through a minor programming oversight.
Not seeing the fuss or reasons for vilifying either the member that noticed it or the site. But then I would say that.
Well I've actually never been a premium member, still I was able to have 100 posts per page since 2005...
Famineuntil yesterday, everyone enjoyed 100 posts per page through a minor programming oversight.
I'm kinda used to it and adding new features for a reasonale fee is one thing, taking a former free "service" away is another.
Whom I don't understand is the original poster. What's his point ? Need for admiration ?
It's not like he found a loophole for hackers that could destroy GTP and costs thousands of dollars if not detected in time. That is something I would post. Instead he ( probably accidently ) killed a little feature for longterm members - not the end of the world but unnecessary in my book.