- 2,647
You should do more sit ups then
even doing 10 per day will help
even doing 10 per day will help
Impossible to drive without abs
- Thread starter Prontas_Probe
- 35 comments
- 3,017 views
- 4,089
- Utah
Yeah, many people criticize me about not being able to trail brake, but I've proven it's not necessary to do so at all. The ABS 0 I only do it for fun, in cars that don't have ABS in real life. Almost 80% of my cars which a modern, I use ABS 1. I've gotten so used to it that it's hard for me to find a difference between having it on or off.
Try the brake bias, you'll see a low setting will almost completely eliminate lock up and still maintain a good braking distance.
- 306
- United Kingdom
- Kasabian1972
Or just lie down and ditch the situps altogether?
Been watching those sledging guys in russia, they drive bloody well and they're all lying down 👍
- 261
- New Zealand
- T4MAK1NGHINI
I guess F1 cars are just about impossible to drive without abs, you gota be so fit have abs like Bruce Lee to drive it competitively
My thought regard to the way of braking to decelerate from top speed, you slam on brakes as hard you can and because the rotors are spinning so fast the tyres simply won't lock up. After a moment, could be a second or fraction of a second, your callipers start to get the better of rotors the tyres start to lock up. Listen to tyre screech or just anticipate the timing, before the lock up happens ease off the pressure. The slower the car gets the more the callipers overpower the rotors and easier for the tyres to lock up. So you gota ease off more pressure, gradually and smoothly without locking up (the hardest part of braking in general). Do the exact opposite of throttling out of corners. Is this correct?
When driving normal cars on road we were taught to brake slowly at first and gradually apply pressure but this is only the case with the passenger car suspension and cheapest tyres you could imagine and the benefit of being gentle and smooth outweighs the drawbacks of letting the car coasting and doing nothing for a moment between acc and decel transition. Am I right?
My thought regard to the way of braking to decelerate from top speed, you slam on brakes as hard you can and because the rotors are spinning so fast the tyres simply won't lock up. After a moment, could be a second or fraction of a second, your callipers start to get the better of rotors the tyres start to lock up. Listen to tyre screech or just anticipate the timing, before the lock up happens ease off the pressure. The slower the car gets the more the callipers overpower the rotors and easier for the tyres to lock up. So you gota ease off more pressure, gradually and smoothly without locking up (the hardest part of braking in general). Do the exact opposite of throttling out of corners. Is this correct?
When driving normal cars on road we were taught to brake slowly at first and gradually apply pressure but this is only the case with the passenger car suspension and cheapest tyres you could imagine and the benefit of being gentle and smooth outweighs the drawbacks of letting the car coasting and doing nothing for a moment between acc and decel transition. Am I right?
- 8,725
That was true in GT5 initially, where 5/5 was literally a 50/50 split. Then they did something that made it all inconsistent, where some cars were fine with a forward bias at 5/5, whilst others were practically rearward, and everything in between.
In GT6, the bias was more stock-like out of the box. For most stock cars, 5/5 is just a relative measure of the stock bias (expressed / controlled as separate "powers", annoyingly). Racing cars are different, but 5/5 is usually still forward enough to drive.
