Impreza 2007

  • Thread starter Thread starter subforever
  • 143 comments
  • 11,075 views
wat r u lot on the UK spec evo has a 0-60 of something like 3.7 seconds and is fater to 0-60 dan a porsche gt carrera


ok now that i have done my research let me hit u wit the cold hard facts.


Manufacturer's figures for Evo8 FQ-340 (340HP)
0-60mph (sec)
4.4
Max speed (mph)
157


Manufacturer's figures for Evo8 FQ-400 (405HP)
0-60mph (sec)
3.5
Max speed (mph)
175

Now would you still like to argue?
 
hahahahah i just did some research for u impreza fan boys and its not looking good.

Manufacturer's figures Impreza WRX STI
0-60mph (sec)
5.2
Max speed (mph)
152


public secrecy i thort u said the impreza was under 5 secs for 0-60. Now seein as u lot are all fan boys of the impreza, when u post ur stuff telling me im wrong just state the 0-60 facts and give a link of your sources. Mine is www.whatcar.com
 
love it or hate it, theres not much we can do except not buy their cars if we dont like em...

but if you love em like me, wicked awesome

i dont get too attached to older car designs since it's
1. history
2. sometimes worthless sentimental value, even though sometimes a good memory
 
Double_R
hahahahah i just did some research for u impreza fan boys and its not looking good.

Manufacturer's figures Impreza WRX STI
0-60mph (sec)
5.2
Max speed (mph)
152


public secrecy i thort u said the impreza was under 5 secs for 0-60. Now seein as u lot are all fan boys of the impreza, when u post ur stuff telling me im wrong just state the 0-60 facts and give a link of your sources. Mine is www.whatcar.com

Where the hell did you get that information? I got it out of 2 magazines, e-tard.

Liquid Li0n
Duuh Subaru is faster

That lancer is only good to replace the dumptruck :p

P.S.: public secrecy thank you for that stakeholding stuff (You have a problem I copy it to show other people and some friends of mine?)

No problem at all, it's the magazines information, not mine.


[edit]
Oh, and Double_R, you may want to include the fact that the FQ400 is AN $85,000.00 CAR. The WRX STi is $31,000.00. Now which one is better overall?

[edit] Oh, and you forgot to mention that only 100 are ever being made.
 
0-60 / 1320

2004 Subaru WRX STi 4.6 / 13.2
2004 Subaru Impreza WRX STi 5.1 / 13.8
 
Why do you compare the MAX version of the Lancer with a NORMAL STi

You have to measure the Lancer EVO VIII FQ400 with the STi S204!--> I mean S203
 
S204 :drool: but once again this isn't a compare thread its just about the SUBY!!
 
indeed bluerex, all those people who are making this thread DIRTY with typing AAAH LANCER YAK has to leave LOL

Do I have to make a thread for you Lancer guys. I would call it "The expensive japanese dumptruck thread"
 
PublicSecrecy
What about the S202?


If there is a S203 then that one is better so I forget the rest :p

Will there be a S204 or S205 in the future i'll forget the S203
 
I think it's the S202 you're thinking of, I've never heard of the S204. Maybe, but I unno.
 
sweet i'll put a bid in for $70 and hope we get lucky. 👍
 
Come on, you know what he means, the WRC spec one. No need to be difficult for the sake of it. He never said the WRC was a model.
 
In that case I apologise for implying you were being difficult. Anyway, he meant the WRC spec rally car concept.
 
Oh ok. Something bugs me about the headlights though.
 
I can't follow anymore

can you give a link to the subaru you mean?
 
It's at the beginning of the thread, he's talking about the new concept that looks peugotish.
 
This one
impmreza200719ei.jpg
 
thx, it is indeed not SO ugly but if you see the one furhter away on the picture, I like that on more
 
The wrc in the small pic is in WRC 3 it was a extreme model
 
Yah the one in the background is the one we have now isn't it?
 
I think theyre all on about the one in the small picture in the top left, the one behind the concept is the current one.
 
Back