IQ Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter gt_masta
  • 162 comments
  • 4,877 views

Your IQ


  • Total voters
    63
Plague.Ghost
Turns out 170 is not the max, and there's no way I'm a genius.


GENIUS! GENIUS! *throws rocks at the "genius"*

Sorry. But IQ test are completely bogus and fictitious.

I'm not bitter, I got a 159. But they are. :mad:

No offense, but you are NOT smarter than Famine. 👎
 
THE ED3
would you like a tissue to wipe your nose off?
Since when does an arbitrary number make you intelligent?
 
150. I managed to do it all this time, even though i'm playing GT4, talking to my mom, listening to music (while also muting out the bad words), and IM'ing others. Not bad.
 
Raghavan
150. I managed to do it all this time, even though i'm playing GT4, talking to my mom, listening to music (while also muting out the bad words), and IM'ing others. Not bad.

Hey, whatever.

If you feel comfortable with judging your intelligence with made-up numbers, that's fine.

I got a 159. I'm not THAT smart. :sick:

:/

I took it again, on dial up. I got a 129. :yuck: 👎

No such thing as an accurate or proper IQ test.
 
xXSilencerXx
Everybaody admits we cant beat Famine a knowledge contest ( at least not on GTP ).

I could beat Famine at Jeopardy.
 
logi74
Hey, whatever.

If you feel comfortable with judging your intelligence with made-up numbers, that's fine.

I got a 159. I'm not THAT smart. :sick:

:/

I took it again, on dial up. I got a 129. :yuck: 👎

No such thing as an accurate or proper IQ test.
I'm not believing it, but i was thinking that i'd get more like a 110.
 
a score above 160 isnt possible using a accurate age proportional test, so at a guess i will say this test like the vast majority on the web is nonsense.

the one the BBC did a while ago is probably the most accurate widely used one of recent times.
 
Nonsense. The BBC's is the most inaccurate I've come across in a while - it was only accurate in the range of 80-120, or the average person. Anything outside that was way off. For example, it wasn't possible to score below - I think - 60, even if you got no questions right. Time taken to complete the test was not factored in. It also relied in part on knowledge, rather than intelligence (water pressure, slip angles, famous faces).


My IQ was measured, professionally, at 163 when I was at primary school, aged 7.
 
I've taken it twice.
The first time I got 130 something.
The second time 150 something.
When I was formally test in the sixth grade I got 146 or 149 I can't remember.

I think it's pretty much a bunch of 'hooey'.
 
Blake
Why are you getting professional IQ tests at 7?

Because 163 isn't "normal". I was tested - something which was arranged by my school - because I seemed to be unusually bright.

Why are you using the present tense for something which happened 21 years ago? :D
 
Blake
Why are you getting professional IQ tests at 7?
Because he was offered one, I had my first one at 15, I had another a couple of years ago, both put me at the same, the first one was 134, the second was bracketted at 130-135.
 
Back