You shouldnt be wearing down your front tires at ALL especially if your Rears arent worn down.
I agree. Or maybe make the racing softs like GT4's soft tires, which lasted about 2-3 good laps, like a qualifying tire.This tire thing needs to be addressed by PD, or at least bump up the longevity of hards and mediums by quite a bit.
Not necessarily...it depends on the car, the track, and the driving style. People who have a tighter setup or tend to push harder on corner entry will have more wear on the fronts.
In oval racing, the front-right tire will almost always wear faster due to the repeated weight transfer to that corner.
Not necessarily...it depends on the car, the track, and the driving style. People who have a tighter setup or tend to push harder on corner entry will have more wear on the fronts.
In oval racing, the front-right tire will almost always wear faster due to the repeated weight transfer to that corner.
Not necessarily...it depends on the car, the track, and the driving style. People who have a tighter setup or tend to push harder on corner entry will have more wear on the fronts.
In oval racing, the front-right tire will almost always wear faster due to the repeated weight transfer to that corner.
+1
Most importantly, at times, a setup that will wear the front faster than the rear might be substantially faster on a given track than a setup that's focussing on preserving the tyres.
It's always a trade off between pace and the longevity of the tyres.
A lot of people have mentioned using the Falken GTR to make the Nurburgring 4 hours a competitive race, where the car runs in the 8:50 range. Mine is bone stock and all I did was that suspension setup. I ran an 8:25 and had no problem dialing it down and running in the 8:40s. It won me the race so I wouldn't say the setup is that bad. (That said I would have rather have been slower to have some more action LOL)
Therefore, it took a little forethought in long races. "What am I going for? Better lap times overall, or fewer pit stops?"
The Racing Hards aren't worthless, the Racing Softs are way overpowered.
IMO, your ride height is too low. I would only go as low as -25 on either front or back if the car can go as low as -50. Too low of a ride height setting will always make your tires squall more in corners, could be the culprit.
^^^^ What he said.those are just 9 price steps. just like there are 2-3 price steps for all other tuning parts.
As for your front tire wear, lately I've been playing around with reducing the F/R brake strength to 3F/1B (or 2/1 or 4/2) and have improved my front tire wear and braking accuracy. I also wonder if your nose is too heavy and adjusting the ride height to equal the back would help reduce wear. For high speed I've even had better results with the ride height higher in the front by approx 10."My testing so far has revealed that the 9 tire types (CH, CM, CS, SH, SM, SS, RH, RM, RS) in GT5 form what appears to be a simple grip multiplier, with each tire type adding approximately .06g of lateral grip."
But in previous games Hard/Soft really meant harder or softer compounds. If you used the hard tyres you would be slower, but go much longer. In GT5 they all last the exact same length, but have differing levels of grip.
Another point where GT5 has gone backwards.
I remember in older GT games you'd do an endurance race, softs might last you 6-8 laps, mediums 12-14 and hards 20 laps.
And you can imagine the PD board meeting going like this...
'OK, tires seemed about right in GT4. We HAVE to change that...'
'I'll get right on it'![]()
Sorry, Tommy, I misunderstood your OP and I went off in the wrong direction. I didn't know about hard/medium/soft in earlier versions.This is what I was saying in my original post but everyone has been replying its my suspension setup.
It's not your suspension set up. During the 4hrs of Tsukuba, my bone stock 91 Miata killed the front tyres, SportSofts, in about 85minutes but the rears MAYBE had 15%wear. It also did the whole race with just one take of gas, plus 5liters to ensure i wouldnt run out. TCS was off and i played around with the brake bias. at one point i had it 2-front 5-rear to try to get some wear out of the rears and nothing.This is what I was saying in my original post but everyone has been replying its my suspension setup.
A) Maybe
B) Probably I think its at 9/7 F/R
C) Nope always run ABS 1 because the brakes lock too easily with my pedal setup
D) Its AWD and the front is set at the lowest settings it allows
You may be right that the suspension setup is too aggressive, however if this is the case the RH tires should still outlast the RS tires. Also 4 laps on Type V Nurburgring is a LONG time, around 35 minutes in that car so its not like I'm cooking them in a few laps of a normal track.
Also I have seen the fronts go faster than the rears on many cars that had NO suspension setup done to them. My 10 Camaro SS for instance will always eat the fronts first and its dead stock, brakes are set to 4/3 on that car as well.
The racing hards drive fine, but in the context of the game they ARE worthless as they should last longer than medium or soft but they don't. The Softs wouldn't be over powered if they were just as sticky but lasted half as long. There are race slicks just as sticky in real life. Its not a feature its a bug.
tyres in GT5 are a big ol mess of poop. You are not the first person to say that RH last less than Race-Softs. It happened to me during the INdy 500:
RS 25laps fastest laps
RM 26laps 3seconds slower per lap
RH 23laps 7seconds slower than RS per lap.
People have told me to drive less aggresive on Hards to make them last longer. Well using each set of tyres i drove just as hard on all the tyres. Full throttle all the way around, no braking for the turns; my set-up allowed about 16laps full throttle on the RS and barely 5-7laps on the RH. At which point i was already 7seconds slower a lap, then im suppost to drive gentler and go even slower to make them last longer!!? on a lap that was about 40-45 seconds, 7 seconds slower is about 16.5% slower! That math doesnt add up to me. that strategy and pace doesnt make sense.
That would be like going from an 8minute lap at the Ring on RS to a 9m32s lap at the ring on RH. LOOSING STRATEGY in my books.
You shouldnt be wearing down your front tires at ALL especially if your Rears arent worn down.
That either means
A) Ride Height too low / Spring Rates, Dampers too soft. Tires hit body while braking hard and lock up.
B) Front Bias set too high
C) ABS is Off.
D) Too much FWD / and a poorly set up LSD in the front. Should be 5/5/5 if it is AWD (not sure if it is or not)
Because I NEVER have my front tires worn down hardly any, it not at all. In any of my cars. After MANY laps of ANY track, only my rears are done.
So I really dont know what you're doing that causes that to be so wrong for you.
EDIT: I saw someone experiencing this on their S2K GT1 the other day while mine wasnt doing it at all and like I said I get the exact opposite because that's how it should be and I have my suspension set up properly. His were worn to about 25% Front and 75% rear while mine were nearly 90% front when they were at 25 rear. I really couldnt understand how he was getting that because his rears lasted longer then mine but fronts not nearly the same, and I have so much trouble even keeping my rears because I burn the rubber off em so much.
I suggested raising his ride height and tightening the springs more then what he had (customized it himself) and suggested he set ARB to 5 or 6 F/R and what do ya know, front tires stopped wearing down so much and his tires started wearing down very even.