If you were Ron Dennis would you want to work with a backstabbing, arrogant driver?
Frankly, I don't see why F1 bosses and drivers ("employees") should get along better than regular bosses and employees in regular firms. I understand that, in order to get a good spot, you need a reputation for being a fast driver who also develops well. But I see no reason they should actually get along fine.
After all, according to what I heard, Montezemolo wasn't too fond of MSC, either.
Team principles and their drivers have a much closer working relationship than most boss / employee situations. Todt not Montezemolo was MS's boss - they had a great relationship.
Button & Hamilton @ McLaren FTW!!!
A backstabbing, arrogant driver who may just win my team another Driver's title, hmmm.. 💡
One thing Alonso has managed to do is make Michael Schumacher look like a Saint by comparison.
So true...Button anywhere away from Honda FTW......even super aguri
Fernando Alonso did not speak to McLaren boss Ron Dennis for over a month because the Spaniard does not get the preferential treatment over team-mate Lewis Hamilton he believes he deserves.
Dennis admitted at last week's World Motor Sport Council hearing that he had not talked to Alonso since a row at the Hungarian Grand Prix.
But the revelations only came out when the transcripts of the hearing were published on Wednesday.
"We are not on speaking terms, but that does not matter," said Dennis.
Dennis, referring to the conversation in Hungary in which Alonso told him he had information that could be used against McLaren in the spy controversy involving the British team and Ferrari, said: "We have not had any conversations since that point.
Treatment
"First, the relationship between Fernando and myself is extremely cold. That is an understatement.
"In Fernando's mind, there is the firm belief that our policy, whereby each driver receives equal treatment, does not properly reflect his status as world champion."
It is not known if the pair are back on speaking terms now.
Dennis added: "He bases this assertion on the fact his experience and knowledge and what came to him from his former team is such that he should receive an advantage."
The row with Alonso, which led to the Spaniard's disclosure he had knowledge of Ferrari technical information, came after Alonso lost pole position after a dispute with Hamilton.
Upset
Dennis added: "In that discussion, he was extremely upset with what had taken place the previous day, but nowhere nearly as upset as I was."
Dennis also revealed McLaren had asked Alonso to attend the Paris hearing, but the Spaniard had refused.
"Alonso is not here because he does not want to be here," he added.
"He does not speak to anyone much. He is a remarkable recluse for a driver. He is not here by choice.
"Moreover, he said he had other things to do by previous arrangement. I cannot force him to come. We asked him to come."
But Button's signed on for another season at Honda hasn't he? I think they're still paying WIlliams off for buying Button out of his contract, so JB won't be going anywhere anytime soon.Button & Hamilton @ McLaren FTW!!!
Lewis Hamilton was in grave danger of being excluded from the Formula One world championship before an impassioned plea from his counsel.
FIS president Max Mosley and his officials had made it clear that Hamilton and team-mate Fernando Alonso could well be thrown out of the drivers' world championship at last week's spy scandal hearing.
After hours of submissions, new evidence including an email conversation between Alonso and test driver Pedro de la Rosa was thought to have spoilt the drivers' title race.
Mosley and the World Motor Sport Council heard an impassioned plea by Mark Phillips QC to allow Hamilton to remain in the title race, which spared the rookie the devastating blow of being excluded.
The conclusion was that Hamilton and Alonso were free to continue to race, while McLaren were hammered with a £50million fine and stripped of all their constructors' points.
Defence plea
In his defence submission, with a transcript of the hearing released by the FIA, Phillips remarked: "Lewis Hamilton has done nothing wrong.
"He has driven brilliantly and is leading the drivers' championship by three points (as was the case at the time).
"If McLaren were banned from competing in the remaining races, Lewis Hamilton would not be able to compete in the final four races.
"He would lose the points that he has so brilliantly won over the last few months, to the sheer delight and excitement of millions of ordinary motor-racing fans.
"The same would be true in 2008. If McLaren were excluded, Lewis Hamilton would not be able to compete in 2008, and McLaren would lose him as a driver.
"Perhaps he would drive elsewhere, assuming first that he could find a seat and assuming that that was a competitive seat.
"But I ask you to remember what he said in his statement: he has wanted to drive for McLaren for all of his racing life; he has been there since he was a young boy; he has been supported throughout his career by McLaren, and wants to continue racing for McLaren."
Disaster
Phillips argued that "it would be an absolute disaster for Formula One" if McLaren were thrown out of the championship.
In summation with regard to Hamilton, Phillips added: "...it would be a travesty to penalise him.
"We do not ask that any different treatment be given team-mate and chief competitor in this year's Formula One championship, Fernando Alonso.
"When you come to consider what is fair, proportionate and just, we invite you to have in mind that the world wants to see the world's top drivers competing on-track for the world championship.
"They do not want to see it decided by lawyers. We respectfully invite you to leave the world championship alone.
"Where Lewis Hamilton is concerned, let him get back to the track, to become the first rookie world champion in Formula One history."
With three races remaining in Japan, China and Brazil, Hamilton still has the opportunity to do just that.
Actually he was quite a difficult member of Renault last year and was blaming his team on several occasions when it looked like he was not going to win the championship. The difference between then and now is he now has a teammate who is more than capable of beating him, and his response to that is to bad mouth his team and demand preferential treatment, and not simply earn the championship.I don't think Alonso was ever so difficult (or had such a difficult time) at Renault.
I think McLaren will be overjoyed to see Alonso leave, and if for some reason he refuses, they will likely just buy out his contract.I'm seriously starting to doubt Alonso will be anywhere near McLaren next season...
*snip*
Skysports
Shall we start an official Lowegate thread in preparation?![]()
I think McLaren will be overjoyed to see Alonso leave, and if for some reason he refuses, they will likely just buy out his contract.
Now if Alonso goes back to Renault as I suspect he will, I'm going to bust a gut if this time next year Bob Bell, the technical director for Renault's F1 team, and a British citizen, and friend of Mclaren's current technical director, Paddy Lowe, is caught with 700+ pages of McLaren technical data.
Shall we start an official Lowegate thread in preparation?![]()
Of course they can, and considering all that has happened, and as complex as these driver contracts are with all sorts of escape clauses and conditions for both the driver and the team, they may already have enough to allow McLaren to exercise a possible escape clause without having to buy his contract out.I don't think McLaren can just "buy out" his contract if he chooses not to leave.
The wheels are now in motion for the early conclusion of Fernando Alonso's McLaren contract, according to reports.
On Tuesday, the German daily Bild said the team's lawyers are now working on ending the deal, after Spaniard Alonso's relationship with McLaren reached a new low following the espionage affair and claims of lying and extortion in Belgium.
"Adios, Alonso!" Bild exclaimed.
The news brings a fresh perspective to team boss Ron Dennis' admission at Spa-Francorchamps that he is seeking "closure" after one of the most difficult seasons in his 40-year career in racing.
"Part of our closure will be to take all the controversy out of the team," the Briton said, adding that any variation to any driver contract for next year would be "by mutual agreement."
"We have contracts with both drivers and those contracts are not under discussion. Our objective is to be focused on the remaining races this season.
If there is any desire for anybody to vary their contract then, there will be the appropriate time to sit and talk about it, but that desire has not been expressed," Dennis declared on Saturday.
McLaren informed F1-Live.com that there have been no developments since the above statement was made.
Fernando Alonso's contract runs until the end of 2008 and also includes an option for a third year.
Nevertheless, it is believed that Alonso will return to Renault, where under the guidance of his mentor Flavio Briatore he secured back-to-back titles in 2005 and 2006.
McLaren will not appeal last Thursday's World Motor Sport Council verdict, according to team boss Ron Dennis.
Last week McLaren were stripped of all their constructors' championship points for the season and handed a $100m fine by the WMSC after being found guilty of using Ferrari secrets.
McLaren had until Friday 5pm (CET) to appeal the verdict but announced at the 11th hour that they would accept the punishment, although still protested their innocence.
Best interests of the sport
"Having now had time to study the judgement of the World Motor Sport Council with its lawyers and shareholders, McLaren thinks it is in the best interests of the sport, and its goal of winning races and World Championships, not to appeal," the team said in a statement.
'It is clear from the full judgement that the World Motor Sport Council concluded that the charge that a McLaren employee had "unauthorised possession of documents and confidential information" was proven.
"Despite the existence of no evidence that the information was applied, tested or shared with the engineering team (which it was not), this possession constitutes a breach of the Code.
"To our regret and embarrassment, the content of the previously unknown emails demonstrated possession not being limited to a single person, albeit unsanctioned in any way by the team. For this breach of Article 151c, a very heavy penalty has been imposed on the team.
"The major principle of the issue for McLaren is: this information was not used to gain advantage on its cars.
"Moving forwards, and in consultation with our shareholders, we will now review and further strengthen our internal compliance structures and processes."
Distraction
Team boss Ron Dennis, who has borne the brunt of McLaren's 'Stepneygate' woes, is keen to put the matter behind him and move on as his drivers challenge for the 2007 drivers' championship title.
"We believe the time has come to put this huge distraction behind us. McLaren wants to win races and world championships," he said.
"We are fortunate to have, and continue to receive, unwavering support from our employees, sponsor partners and Formula 1 fans across the world - all of whom are equally keen that we totally focus on winning this year's Drivers' Championship and the remaining three races of the season."
This entire thing is so ridiculous.
Second, many people think that Hamilton is the saint and Alonso is the devil. In this case, tell me why Hamilton didn't give all the information he had for the FIA. Looks like trying to look clean to me. Too bad that everyone knows that he had access to the same information.
Agreed.This entire thing is so ridiculous.
Agreed as well. I don't necessarily blame Ron Denis for doing his best at damage control and at least continually trying to portray himself and McLaren as innocent victims, but on the other hand it truly is absurd to even think for a moment that for as long as Coughlan and other McLaren principles had possession and knowledge of the data and were proven to even been discussing it with the test driver who then discussed it with Alonso - for Ron Denis to NOT have known what was going on is truly absurd.First, McLaren still tries to say that the information was of no use to them. I wonder if they can read, at least for me the emails and SMS's looked very much like using the information. They lie, and they know it. Hell, everyone knows it. And still they're trying to get away with it.
Unless I'm mistaken the investigation never uncovered or at least never released any evidence that Hamilton had knowledge of what was going on, but I would find that hard to believe as well.Second, many people think that Hamilton is the saint and Alonso is the devil. In this case, tell me why Hamilton didn't give all the information he had for the FIA. Looks like trying to look clean to me. Too bad that everyone knows that he had access to the same information.
Because in the eyes of the FIA and I suspect the vast majority of F1 fans and sponsors, both of whom F1 would not survive without, taking McLaren out of the driver's championship would have been a disaster for the sport.Third. What if this had happened for Super Aguri or Spyker? The team would be banned for two years without questioning. And I see no reason why McLaren should get a different treatment just because they are successful. Why don't they get the punishment they deserve?
Third. What if this had happened for Super Aguri or Spyker? The team would be banned for two years without questioning. And I see no reason why McLaren should get a different treatment just because they are successful. Why don't they get the punishment they deserve?
Actually, as the RTL commentators highlighted... Spyker has plans for other team's cars. They actually were proud of saying "We know the STR has the same blueprints as the RBR, because we have them.
Yet nothing happened.
. Change "was" to "may have been" and "though it may forever be" to "but it is" and you have a statement with no weight to it at all.some degree of sporting advantage was obtained, though it may forever be impossible to quantify that advantage in concrete terms
Second, many people think that Hamilton is the saint and Alonso is the devil. In this case, tell me why Hamilton didn't give all the information he had for the FIA. Looks like trying to look clean to me.