Most Disappointing Cars in Gran Turismo

  • Thread starter Thread starter All Your Base
  • 73 comments
  • 6,360 views
I have found the Stratos to be disappointing simply because you have to drive it like your driving a BTR. $300,000 may not be the greatest investment for this car, though the looks is very classic though 👍
 
I think its a big ridiculous to buy a car that clearly isnt a performance car and expect it to run with the big dogs... the 370gt is a 370z with 2 extra seats and a lot of extra pounds in a longer body... its a luxury 'sporting' coupe... goes with the Lexus sc430 and the 350GT sedan... you can drive them hard as hell and beat the competition but pound for pound in a 1 to 1 fight the 370z will wack them...

I personally find any expensive car, you saved up for, say $1mil up and you drive it and go... "eh what is this?"

The rare racing cars like the $1 mil. + rally cars are like this. I suppose it really doesnt matter as most of us have huge cash reserves anyway.
 
I think its a big ridiculous to buy a car that clearly isnt a performance car and expect it to run with the big dogs... the 370gt is a 370z with 2 extra seats and a lot of extra pounds in a longer body... its a luxury 'sporting' coupe... goes with the Lexus sc430 and the 350GT sedan... you can drive them hard as hell and beat the competition but pound for pound in a 1 to 1 fight the 370z will wack them...

I personally find any expensive car, you saved up for, say $1mil up and you drive it and go... "eh what is this?"

The rare racing cars like the $1 mil. + rally cars are like this. I suppose it really doesnt matter as most of us have huge cash reserves anyway.
Kinda goes to show how PP system is broken sometimes.
 
I have found the Stratos to be disappointing simply because you have to drive it like your driving a BTR. $300,000 may not be the greatest investment for this car, though the looks is very classic though 👍
Strange - I've found differently. Since 1.19 (I believe), the Stratos has handled very well for me.

 
Strange - I've found differently. Since 1.19 (I believe), the Stratos has handled very well for me.
If I remember correctly, the Stratos is VERY tricky to drive in it's stock configuration from the Dealership. However, if you slap a tune on the car (suspension & alignment) it will be just fine. It's still going to keep you on your toes, but there's nothing wrong with it. For some reason, many people seem to think that if a car doesn't corner like it's on rails, accelerate like it's got rocket boosters in the back and stop on a dime - then the car stinks. The Stratos has a LOT of character...enjoy it! Heck, listen to the very opening of this video - what the owner of the car says about the Lancia Stratos:

 
None of the cars in this thread holds a candle to the absolute most useless car in Gran Turismo ever...

The Renault Clio 16v from GT2.

snap007_zps8e472bd4.png


From @Parnelli Bone gtcarreviews.com

This car features a 2.0 liter DOHC inline-4 engine with electronic fuel injection and 4 valves per cylinder. This is mated to a 5-speed. The Clio is front-wheel drive. Anybody shocked? Didn't think so.

Well the first surprise comes AFTER we buy the Clio 16v in this game, and take it to the infamous Test Track. Okay, so the manufacturer quotes a healthy 171 HP. Okay, not bad. But when we test it, we find out that it REALLY only has 108. This is the GT2 version I'm talking about, not the one in GT4. Anyways, that's a difference of 63 horses! Merde!!!

When testing the Clio 16v (which hit 0-60 mph in 11.4 seconds, 0-100 in about 34) you know the tested figure (108 horses) is the accurate one! Top speed is 126.8 mph, with the engine revving at only 5,800 rpm, even though the red-line is 7,000. This is the classic indication of poor high-end torque, but it doesn't help that the Clio's face probably has a somewhat high drag coefficient.

For any of you who have bought a Clîo in GT2 (not the Clio Sport V6, I'm talking about the one with the 4-cylinder engine costing $22,380) you have my sympathy. This difference in quoted versus test figures is the largest error I've yet seen in any Gran Turismo 2 vehicle. If I were buying one of these in real life I'd be pissed, man!

So the solution is to go and buy some engine upgrades, right? Now here's shock #2!

I went and got the ROM computer and port polishing...engine balancing would have to wait till I won more money/races. Then I went to get a turbo. Hmmm...no turbo. Okay, so let's check out the NA tuning. No normal-aspirated tuning either!?? What the hell? Now just who was responsible for THIS goof?!!! When comparing the Clio to other European hatchbacks, this lack up upgrades really seems out of place. Want to mod a Peugeot 106? A Citroën Saxo? An Italian Lancia Y??? It can be done. But the Clio 16v has been oddly forgotten...just another casualty in GT2's long, long list of mistakes.

Gearing is tall, especially that all-important 2nd to 3rd shift-up. It's recommended to get the close ratio gearbox, as well as a lighter flywheel for flat courses, and single-plate clutch. Actually, to be honest, don't get any of this stuff. This is one of those cars that you should really steer clear of, unless you don't care much about engine upgrades. Or winning.

The Clio understeers like most any FF car will do, oversteer is rare and controllable. The car's stock tires do okay for easier races, and you might find you'll need sport tires eventually--but you'll never win the Sunday Cup series in a 16v, the engine is too frickin' weak. Any other concerns?

The Clio 16v is also too slow to compete in the FF Challenge and most B license races. It's too over-powered to enter two of the K Cup races! Needless to say: you'll never need racing slicks, and in my opinion you won't really need to spend money on sports, either.

Getting suspension upgrades is possible, but since the car's never gonna win more than a couple races, anything past the easily-bought sports package is a waste. I can also say we'll never need to spend a cent on brake upgrades.

Any other car in the GT series at least has some redeeming qualities. The Clio has none at all. It seems like PD accidentally puts it in the game and forgot to code the rest of the stuff that comes with other cars. Thank God it has been improved in later games though.
 
In GT in general - the American Muscle cars - the lack of speed due to the gearbox amazed me. Hollywood lied to me!

In GT6 the Jaguar XKE really didn't tick the boxes so in a sulk I put it in the stockyard thing... it has been there since week one of playing the game...

I'd also say the Caterham 7 but I've yet to get one in GT6 - the KTM and the Rocket were so good I didn't want to risk getting into a grump about the seven again.
 
I've got to step up for the Skyline 370GT. There is a two tier for FR cars at every PP. At 500, you have the Mazda's and the Z4M. That stupid Series One.

But there is a group of FR cars in the 1275kg+ range that all run great together. They might be a few seconds off the best, but they are still great cars that can win races. Boss 302, Challenger, '10 Camaro ss, Aston Martin V12 Vantage and Db9, Ferrari 599, Mazerati Gran Turismo. The Skyline is in that group.

Ya, equal drivers will definitely do better in an RX7 (Or any Mazda for that matter) but as so often is the case, you don't get equal drivers on track.
 
Although it would be asking for too much, I just wished they can let you supercharge both 350GT and 370GT Skylines like how you could with the Z33 and Z34 Fairlady Z.

I dunno, I want to like the 370GT Coupe with its all-round performance, but hardly will there be fair game for it online as others would use the fastest cars of the 500 PP range. *cough*Series One*cough*
 
Back