Most urgent improvement: Poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter tinram
  • 75 comments
  • 4,296 views

Which would be the most urgent improvement for GT5

  • Faster AI

    Votes: 92 30.7%
  • Turn up both mechanical and visual damage.

    Votes: 56 18.7%
  • More premiums

    Votes: 77 25.7%
  • More Tracks

    Votes: 171 57.0%
  • Fix Glitching

    Votes: 30 10.0%
  • Be able to pause and save on Endurance and Series Races.

    Votes: 180 60.0%
  • Higher XP points or lower Level XP requirements past level 30.

    Votes: 49 16.3%
  • Fix Bugatti Veyron, no grip what's up?

    Votes: 12 4.0%

  • Total voters
    300
GP tracks that are missing from the game or at the very least bring back a few of the tracks from GT4 like El Capitan, etc.
 
None of the above.

Fix excessive cockpit camera shake - a problem that was noted in the recent Inside Sim Racing full review.
 
None of the above.

Fix excessive cockpit camera shake - a problem that was noted in the recent Inside Sim Racing full review.


I honestly don't get it when people say the cockpit view shakes too much. Is it just me or is no one else noticing a "exaggerated" cockpit view? Something tells me these people would really hate NFS Shift
 
I would vote to Fully support G25/27 Logitech wheels.

I use a G25 wheel, and it's fully supported. I'm able to remap my buttons to suit my driving style, and if I want, I can switch to the gated shifter mode, and heel-toe with the best of them. Give me more tracks from the past Gran Turismo games, and some real tracks, like Spa, Dubai, Silverstone, etc. Give us the option to save while pitting during endurance events. If they are going to give us courses like the Daytona Road Course, why not give us the 24h of Daytona event? More premium cars would be nice as well. An intelligent AI would be great. All one has to do is try rFactor/GTR2/RACE07 to know what i'm talking about. Lastly, remove this crappy trading restriction.
 
Bad car?? a middled aged tv presenter who has driven cars for over 10 years says it is the best car in our lifetime... think before you type.

Thanks for explaining to everyone why that car is so overrated. People take what is said on Top Gear like it's the bible.
 
All the Veyron is good for is going fast in a straight line. I would have prefered to have the Gumpert Apollo in the game.
 
All the Veyron is good for is going fast in a straight line. I would have prefered to have the Gumpert Apollo in the game.

I would have preferred they made the Veyron premium. Despite what a lot of people here say (and think they know), the Veyron is an amazing car. This may come as a shock, but guess what, it wasn't designed to be a track car.

It actually handles really well, it's just that it's handling is overshadowed by its straight line speed. Some people seem to think that handling ability should increase proportionally with power, but I hate to break it to you, the laws of physics don't change. Also don't forget that it weighs over 2 tonnes!
 
The problem is that the Veyron really doesn't handle worth a crap, so every single post that's ever been made that criticizes the Veyron for it's poor performance are right on the mark. Air conditioning, air bags, iPod docks, and all that crap are nice but they don't mean great track performance. The Veyron might be great for a creature-comfort-mobile, but not in terms of track performance. Nobody is criticizing the Veyron for lack of creature comforts but for inability to corner as well as other high-end cars.

The Veyron's poor cornering abilities speak for themselves. When you take into consideration that the thing has anywhere from "more horsepower" to "way, way more horsepower" and a much higher top speed than other cars at the top of the Power Board, the Veyron really should be beating the competition by several seconds and not by just fractions of a second, let alone being beaten by cars, especially as in the case with the base Veyron.

So, if the Veyron has so much power, such a high top speed, and rapid acceleration, why does it not beat the other top-performing cars by several seconds? The obvious answer is that it loses in the corners. Underperfoming in the corners is where people criticize it, and every single post that anybody has ever made about the matter have always been right on the mark. It really does suck in corners. Rather than being beaten by the Ariel Atom 500 by almost two full seconds and only barely beating cars like the Gumpert Apollo or Ascari A10 by less than half a second, the Veyron Super Sport really should be beating them all by several seconds. It doesn't because it's a wagon-load of turds in corners.

Let's also not forget that the Power Board actually excludes several non-race cars because of nitpicky things like not sitting high enough to drive over a "sleeping policeman", and these cars also beat the Veyron Super Sport by several seconds, despite having less power and lower top speeds. The difference is cornering ability, and the Veyron undeniably lacks it.

Defending the Veyron as being a super-fast creature-comfort vehicle with comfy seats, stereo, sat-nav, and so forth doesn't change the fact that it still performs poorly in corners, relative to other supercars that perform in more ways than just top-end speed.


The whole point of the Veyron has completely flown over yours, and many other heads. It was never meant to be the fastest car to ever lap a circuit. You want that, then get a Caparo T1.

It is meant to be the first one-thousand-horsepower car which ANYONE can EASILY pilot SAFELY through town or right up to its top speed of over 400km/h. All this while being pampered in opulence. The fact that even ham fisted Captain Slow can do it without breaking a sweat bears testament to that. Have you even seen a video of it doing 400+ ? The car is so damn stable, its almost unbelievable. Scary even. But most admirable.

Making a luxury 1000 horsepower car that civilized will come with compromises. Excessive weight. Yes, it WILL NOT go around a corner as fast as other (slower) supercars, but its almost as if you expect it to pull massive speeds through an apex just like it can power down a straight. Wrong. It was not built with that in mind.

Open your mind, learn, understand.
 
^Great post. 👍
 
Faster AI. If we had that + event creator, this game could last me 'til GT6.
 
The most urgent I'd have to say is the CR system. Don't earn NEARLY enough to do all we need to do? If I win a race I should be able to upgrade my car and still have money left over. Now I have to win MULTIPLE races to afford that. I'm tired of having to play the same races tens of times to earn enough to buy a new car; especially at the higher levels. Like if I need the FGT and I run a 60 lap endurance race I should get at least 25-50% of the way to buying the FGT; but nooooo it's only 2.5% of the way there. So I have to run the 2.5hr 60 lap endurance race 40 times to earn enough to buy a FGT. Ridiculous!👎
 
I just have a question?

How much does this actually mean? Has any poll here been looked at by PD and actually taken to heart?

From what I have seen most of the "requests" for patches has been made since V1.1 and still no joy...

Just wondering....
 
The whole point of the Veyron has completely flown over yours, and many other heads. It was never meant to be the fastest car to ever lap a circuit. You want that, then get a Caparo T1.

It is meant to be the first one-thousand-horsepower car which ANYONE can EASILY pilot SAFELY through town or right up to its top speed of over 400km/h. All this while being pampered in opulence. The fact that even ham fisted Captain Slow can do it without breaking a sweat bears testament to that. Have you even seen a video of it doing 400+ ? The car is so damn stable, its almost unbelievable. Scary even. But most admirable.

Making a luxury 1000 horsepower car that civilized will come with compromises. Excessive weight. Yes, it WILL NOT go around a corner as fast as other (slower) supercars, but its almost as if you expect it to pull massive speeds through an apex just like it can power down a straight. Wrong. It was not built with that in mind.

Open your mind, learn, understand.

I'm not questioning that. I just fail to see a reason to believe the hype that it's "the greatest car in the world." Especially people who say it just because a certain Jeremy Clarkson said it.
 
MÜLE_9242;5203367
I'm not questioning that. I just fail to see a reason to believe the hype that it's "the greatest car in the world." Especially people who say it just because a certain Jeremy Clarkson said it.

Thats the beauty of having a brain in your head. You dont have to beleive it :)

As much as I admire it, I know it isn't "the greatest car in the world". That title means too many different things to different people. Certainly one of the most admirable though. People forget just how much 1000 horsepower really is.

JC is an entertainer. Nothing else. I love the show, but don't take their opinions as the truth. In manu cases its far from it.
 
Most urgent improvement to me would be a save-feature for the enduros, I've done almost all of them excluding both A-spec Le Mans and Nürburgring 24 hour events, I'm waiting for a save feature to do them (as PD said to be working on that) and I hope it will arrive sooner rather than later.

The rather arbitrary 1 million trading limit is also something they implemented possibly due to a large amount of rogue traders who did not supply the car they promised and the negative feedback that provided.
A trade function (separate from the gift function) whereby both cars could be put into some kind of 'box' which could be checked beforehand by both traders and simultaneously transferred would solve this perhaps, not sure if this could be implemented though (or if this is the real reason behind this limit ofcourse).

And more Premium versions of Standard cars obviously.
 
Back