Great work Steve. Also find it kind of funny how latte would continuously take a huge dump in my thread about motion and say I was playing with a "toy" but in this thread it's "awesome". Funny stuff.
First of all you haven't been provoked here and are making false claims.
I may of been over persistent in your thread of my own views in having personal reasons for not seeing motion as a longterm investment. I think the problem in your own thread is what I can describe as your displeasure in someone (me) questioning the technology used in D-Box against alternatives. I also apologised at a time in the thread.
For me, it is very interesting trying to understand how D-Box uses "Telemetry" via its actuators for tactile as well and from a technical perspective how that compares to what can be done with community solutions and common tactile products.
The reason behind all the questioning was not to try and belittle your setup or make it look inferior as such but to determine what can be done from a community build perspective against a sold solution like D-Box. I even suggested the possibilities of mixing additional buttkickers etc onto your build but you were having none of it. You were telling us D-Box was awesome and we should all just be amazed at your rig then made a stupid comparsion to a Buttkicker Gamer when that isn't even close to what I was suggesting. What is funny is how you try to ridicule my own experimentation regards tactile and the possibilities. Yet then later mention how motion needs tactile to increase the immersion. Furthermore other cockpit builders that utilise D-Box also incorporate "Buttkicker" to further enhance the immersion. So I guess their is a degree of credit to what I was suggesting.
As for calling your "D-Box" a toy that's not the way I put it, I already said from my own perspective any such "Man Room" be it something like this, a home arcade or home cinema to me are what "I" personally class as "boys toys". Your cockpit was not singled out at all.
For the record please by all means quote me where I have stated that "motion" is now amazing? Your telling people here things that I have not said at all. My position hasn't changed at all.
Try reading what I am saying, I have said from a project perspective it is very interesting thread. Steve, is much more it seems down to earth and willing to accept that not everything he buys or does may be fantastic regards his cockpit. He certainly seems more open and willing to share information about his cockpit. Also if he does try and incorporate motion to the wheel/pedals it is good to get "his opinion" based on "his" own testing having tried seat only motion Vs the main cockpit components.
That is a debate regarding various motion options. It may also be possible personal preference but for me and having a technical interest while appreciation as to what others want to do and achieve with their cockpits I find his approach and feedback as quite valuable and interesting.
To make things clear to anyone. I really look forward to reading Steve's comments on his findings if he peruses trying different motion solutions. I will gladly help him regards optimising and choosing suitable tactile if he wants come the appropriate time too.
I still however have no long-term personal interest in adding motion to my own rig but had I wanted such the money I have spent lately on other things I certainly could of bought the components.
lol..thanks mate
I'm new here so dont know what the beef with you guys is but I think we should have a forum kitty, all chip in and send you two to a couple's retreat
You may be new here but I remember some of your posts and threads back on "Av Forums" regards your "cinema room".