New GT4 scans - Ferrari 348tb?!?

[Famine]

Define "photorealistic".

"Photorealistic" means, roughly "looks like a real photograph" (although more accurately "looks like real light").

GT4 is better looking than an 1890 Daguerrotype. But it is NOT AS GOOD as a modern digital photograph, and, taking the literal meaning, it does not look like real life.

GT4 looks like being an extremely good-looking game. Photorealistic it is not.

 

[code_kev]

I knew some one would dictionary the term photo realistic

I agree, GT4 is a very nice looking console game, that's all.

The photo I posted was ofc an unfair comparison, but it shows that if you compare GT4 to it, GT4 looks utterly crap.

 

[Kaniyodrift]

Originally posted by cobragt
gt4 is photorealistic.

^ what he said - i've seen him posting it on practically all gaming sites there are so it must be true

 

[code_kev]

Go look in the gamespot rallisport 2 forums, comedy.

Think I mentioned this before.



-demo of cobras eye sight problem-

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28829

ooo so funny

"This ain't render on a pc at all or high-res"

lol. ofc it's not, just thought I'd dig up the past abit, some of it is pure comedy

*remembers the "ps2 is a super computer thread" where all the fanboys were posting technical reviews of the ps2 off sites from 2000, sites which clearly had no idea, talking mumbo jumbo, which the poster just cut n pasted off the site, thus not actually knowing what it meant them selves. So funny. *

 

[T5-R]

Oh, oh!, I can't read Japanese & I'll ignore those that actually can & proclaim Sony is greater than Microsoft & that Ferrari will deffinately be in GT4

GT4 is only photorealistic if you compare GT4 with a picture of itself taken with a camera

 

[cobragt]

Whatever code, arguing with a fool wont get me anywhere. I'm not the one who goes with other's opinions but gaming mags have said gt4 was photorealistic, ign said so.

 

[cobragt]

Microsoft is a joke. Their os are ass, xp sucks, 98 is better, yet they make so much money.

 

[code_kev]

gt4 was photorealistic, ign said so

well if ign said it, it MUST be true! websites over hype everything, I've read sites that said PGR2 is photo realistic, so it MUST be! DUHHHHH HYUUK!

98 better then Xp, you been licking pens again cobra?

Microsoft is a joke

I'd say you were a bigger joke cobra.

 

[daan]

Originally posted by cobragt
I'm not the one who goes with other's opinions but gaming mags have said gt4 was photorealistic, ign said so.

Oh, it must be true then, IGN said so.

Originally posted by cobragt
Microsoft is a joke. Their os are ass, xp sucks, 98 is better, yet they make so much money.

What planet are you on that 98 is better than XP? XP is miles better.

 

[code_kev]

It just gets funnier and funnier. Only reason he doesn't like MS is because of the xbox. He's one of these fanboys who can't accept that other systems are JUST as good. Oh well his loss, but shame he has to stupid these forums by talking crap.

 

[cobragt]

In features xp is better, but it's unstable. Anyway, many sites have said gt4 was photorealistic. I think photorealistic in you all's mind means real but your and my definitions are different. Like I said, compared to other games, gt4 looks the most photorealistic.

 

[code_kev]

I think photorealistic in you all's mind means real but your and my definitions are different

Buy the new cobragt dictionary for 99pence at amazon.com today! For ages 1 to 3.

M is for microsoft "SCUMMMMMMMMMMM"


P is for playstation "The BESTEST EV00000000RZ"


X is for xbox *see M"


etc

Cobra, you can't just change and re-invent words Well you can, but you just end up looking dumb

 

[T5-R]

Originally posted by cobragt
Microsoft is a joke. Their os are ass, xp sucks, 98 is better, yet they make so much money.

Originally posted by cobragt
In features xp is better, but it's unstable.

I've used both 98 & XP, and XP is far far far far far..........(repeat another 50 times) more reliable. Anyone remember the frequent blue screen 'o' death courtesy of 98? Oh yeah & having to restart your PC nearly all the time.

 

[code_kev]

I bet if sony made an OS, cobra would bum it so much, regardless of how good it actually was.

It has to be said (some of you may remember this)

cobragt, owned!

 

[cobragt]

I might get a mac. Microsoft's os are ass.

 

[code_kev]

a big mac?

BTW cobra, use a DIFFERENT OS, no one forces you to use windows.

 

[cobragt]

Hey code, what you think of rsc2? That game looks so fake it's pathetic.

 

[Glut]

photorealistic in this gen doesnt mean real. Gezz

OR

arguing with a fool wont get me anywhere.

I believe I now have a quote

But so many choices.

 

[code_kev]

OWNED!!!!

I bet if RSC2 was on the PS2 cobra would bum it so much, but alas it isn't, so is fanboyism kicks in, and he's forced to hate it lol

 

[cobragt]

Originally posted by Glut
OR

I believe I now have a quote

But so many choices.

Whatever.

 

[Kaniyodrift]

Originally posted by cobragt
Microsoft is a joke. Their os are ass, xp sucks, 98 is better, yet they make so much money.

So ur typing this running OSX or Linux? Ur pretty cool if ur writing this using eg. Konqueror... or even Mozilla... or even Mozilla under Windows... do u? I know how i feel about Microsoft - currently the only thing i'm using by uncle Bill is the OS itself - no IE, no WMP, no Outlook, etc. I know i'll switch to Linux when i'm ready - not come here cursing Microsoft for "having an ass OS and making lots of money" while typing it using Internet Exploder (if ur not then i can look the other way)

 

[T5-R]

Heres a pic I did just for you cobra

 

[code_kev]

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/screenshots_library/dir_240/vortal_pic_120052.jpg

rsc2 looks ok to me, but I guess I don't have "cobragt vision"

 

[cobragt]

Exactly, it looks ok.

 

[code_kev]

Exactly, it looks ok.

unless it was on the ps2, where it would suddenly look awesome.

 

[cobragt]

The ps2 has a new racer coming, dont know the name of it but it will be similar to gt4. It looks better than rsc2, but I'm not going around saying it looks all amazing and what not. No game is even worth looking at twice compared to gt4's photorealistic look, yea photorealistic punks

 

[code_kev]

i think it's time for the wooden spoon awards to make a return...


please show me this racer with better graphics then RSC2, I would love to see it. You only say it looks better then RSC2 because it's on the PS2, lets be honest. Theres a thing called HARDWARE LIMITATIONS, if you knew anything about PCs, you would understand this.

 

[cobragt]

Gt4 code, it has been in your face for some time. Gt4 looks alot more realistic. Rsc2's graphics are meh, seen better.

 

[Kaniyodrift]

I'm sorry Zer0 that ur cool thread got fu<ked up

 

[cobragt]

Code started all the flamming with his reply to me.