Pictures/Info of 2006 F1 cars/season Post Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter Small_Fryz
  • 91 comments
  • 3,332 views
kensei
Can I ask...Why are all these mysterious teams suddenly coming out of the woodwork for 2006?
Who knows … I’m wondering how they can be thinking about joining next season if they haven’t got a significantly developed car already.

Blake
 
Because the Ferrari juggernaught has finally died, that's why.
 
Omnis
Because the Ferrari juggernaught has finally died, that's why.

and here i was thinking it was for the free popcorn...


i heard somewhere that at least the 2nd honda team has been in the works for the past few years.
 
pSI civic
i heard somewhere that at least the 2nd honda team has been in the works for the past few years.
Maybe so, but the team hasn’t even been officially announced yet. So even if it has been in the works, there probably wasn’t any real substance behind the team except a few contracts of intent.

Blake
 
Small_Fryz
More teams is a good thing anyway right?

More competitive teams on the grid is a good thing. Last thing we need is 12 moving chicanes out there instead of 4 (6 teams 2 drivers each = 12).
 
How does 20 races sound?

ITV.com/f1
Speculation persists that the calendar may be extended to 20 races with the Toyota-owned Fuji race track expected to be included at some point in the future.
 
i heard about fuji around the time of brazil i think. 20 races sounds good. if they dont use that little chicane (use the 2005 gt version like in gt4) it should be a good speed track. plus it will be a chance for honda to one up toyota at their track this time.
 
20 tracks would probabyl have to be the limit though cost wise.

:)
 
It’s not so much the cost, it’s the logistics. Many teams have said they’d love to do more races, but the have to be spread out further because the back-to-back races are horrible for many of the teams.

Blake
 
we really need a north american gp. we have many nice tracks here in america. road atlanta is pretty nice. it'd be great for a gp.
 
pSI civic
we really need a north american gp. we have many nice tracks here in america. road atlanta is pretty nice. it'd be great for a gp.

Not really, maybe a different track, but not a totally different race.

Blake
It’s not so much the cost, it’s the logistics. Many teams have said they’d love to do more races, but the have to be spread out further because the back-to-back races are horrible for many of the teams.

Blake

Oh right yeah valid point, i can't see them going 2 week intervals all the time... that would be a 40 week championship... youch.
 
Have you guys seen the new rear-wing propoasal (wich has been accepted by the way and will be used from 2008)? It consists of 2 wings just behind and above the rear tyres with the rear-middle of the car open so that other cars have the possibillity to drive closely behind eachother without loosing much downforce. Plus, Slick tyres are comming back.

fiavoorstel37vd.jpg


Some of the changes will start appearing in 2007.
 
kensei
More competitive teams on the grid is a good thing. Last thing we need is 12 moving chicanes out there instead of 4 (6 teams 2 drivers each = 12).

I don't think that the new proposed teams will be moving chicanes if they're backed by companies such as Honda who can draw ideas, resources, and data from their BAR efforts. Also, with Red Bull buying Minardi, they probably won't be at the back anymore, which really only leaves Jordan/Midland suspect to be moving chicanes. However, their new owner has oodles of cash to dispose of, so perhaps they'll improve a bit as well. And in this new engine era, next year could be a wild crapshoot before the status quo is re-established when the top teams figure out the V8 (which will sound awful, by the way; think over-revved Champ Car, or dentist drill/Dremel tool).

Methinks next year should be very good...
 
IIRC Midland will have the lowest budget next year – I think they’re only budgeted for around $120,000,000…

Blake
 
GT_Fan2005
I agree, will it be rumbling V8s or high pitched F1 screams we are used to.
you make me cry now that the seasons over :(, it better be high pitched.

well if you want a preview i could draw one myself but it wouldn\'t be so good.... :D
 

2006 schedule:-


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/4378794.stm

Bahrain to host the opening race, interesting :odd:

Mar 12: Bahrain Grand Prix (Bahrain)
Mar 19: Malaysian Grand Prix (Sepang)
Apr 2: Australian Grand Prix (Melbourne)
Apr 23: San Marino Grand Prix (Imola)
May 7: European Grand Prix (Nurburgring, Germany)
May 14: Spanish Grand Prix (Barcelona)
May 28: Monaco Grand Prix (Monte Carlo)
Jun 11: British Grand Prix (Silverstone)
Jun 25: Canadian Grand Prix (Montreal)
Jul 2: United States Grand Prix (Indianapolis)
Jul 16: French Grand Prix (Mangy-Cours)
Jul 30: German Grand Prix (Hockenheim)
Aug 6: Hungarian Grand Prix (Hungaroring)
Aug 27: Turkish Grand Prix (Istanbul)
Sep 10: Italian Grand Prix (Monza)
Sep 17: Belgian Grand Prix (Spa-Francorchamps)
Oct 1: Japanese Grand Prix (Suzuka)
Oct 8: Chinese Grand Prix (Shanghai)
Oct 22: Brazilian Grand Prix (Interlagos)
 
pSI civic
we really need a north american gp. we have many nice tracks here in america. road atlanta is pretty nice. it'd be great for a gp.



American tracks can not compete with purpose built F1 circuits like Malyasia, Turkey, Bahrain and Shanghai.

The problem with American circuits is that none of them meet F1's requirements for saftey, pits/garages, track infustructure, etc. When F1 came to Indy...the speedway had to spend ALOT of money to get the place up to snuff for F1, even then it barely did and 5 years later it is getting out dated.

What F1 teams and driver's expect is WAY different than what chump car, the SCCA series, ALMS or the IRL expect.

Not to mention the amount of money track owners have to pay to Bernie to host a race. 90% of track owners in the US would rather not have to spend that much for what is basically a PITA European series (at least seen that way) when for little money (compared to F1) they can have the ALMS or chump cars (most Americans don't know the difference between chump car, IRL and F1). Even the track owners that want another big road race will probably go after some NASCAR series over F1. It will be cheaper for them to get and they will make more from it.

That being said I'd love to see F1 at Infineon (sports car course, seeing LMP1/2 cars go through the "S's" is great, imagine a F1 car, minus that lame chicane...the sports car course in GT4), Laguna Seca (which just spent alot of $$$ to ungrade to host MotoGP, but is still way off F1 spec, not to mention the restrictions on use of the circuit by environmentalists) or back on the long course at Watkin's Glen (which just spent some money to host the IRL and lower the curbs, though this circuit is still way off F1 spec).

It's a money issue 100%.

People say F1 needs American support? It does, sorta...but realistically it's fine without it. Also without an American driver in F1 that is winning (yes I know Scott Speed is driving next year but he really isn't much of anything special) no one will care in this country.

For Americans to care about F1 you'll need someone like with a name like Jeff Gordon or Danica Patrick to race up front in F1.

I remember hearing the rumor around Indy was that Bernie wants a road race in Las Vegas....though post Indy I have read little about that.
 
Well, in first 1990's the government of Catalonia spent a lot of money to build Montmeló to host F1, when Jerez circuit was getting old... and there were no spanish drivers at that time (except Adrian Campos at Minardi). But maybe it's because here in Spain there has been no real motorsports interest at all, excepting MotoGP (Ángel Nieto, Gibernau, Dani Pedrosa...).
 
Back