PITS 2-[Project International Touring Series 2]PS4 

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex ONeill
  • 5,565 comments
  • 257,486 views
Well, this weekend pretty much sucked balls... wasn't able to get on and practice once, didn't get on the PS4 at all. [hate weekends like that].

Are there any forecasts for the race this Thursday - would like to run some practice laps @ Zhuhai Int. tonight and would prefer to practice in the weather we will "probably" be racing in??
 
Well, this weekend pretty much sucked balls... wasn't able to get on and practice once, didn't get on the PS4 at all. [hate weekends like that].

Are there any forecasts for the race this Thursday - would like to run some practice laps @ Zhuhai Int. tonight and would prefer to practice in the weather we will "probably" be racing in??
Calling for 30% chance for rain, I've
Screenshot_20190325-110706.png
tried setting up a wet set-up but I still can't match the AI.
 
@barryf1fan I've since changed those set-up's.
Brakes: 55.0/45.0
Front DF 2.00
Rear DF 5.00
Front camber 1.5
Rear height 94mm
Steering ratio 6.9:1
Toe-in Angle-0.1deg
Traction control 13%

I did this to both of those set-up's if you haven't tried them yet.
 
I've since changed those set-up's.
Brakes: 55.0/45.0
Front DF 2.00
Rear DF 5.00
Front camber 1.5
Rear height 94mm
Steering ratio 6.9:1
Toe-in Angle-0.1deg
Traction control 13%

I did this to both of those set-up's if you haven't tried them yet.

Thanks BTD, I'll try it out tomorrow - I had limited practice this evening (I had to get one race of MotoGP 18 in...) so I worked on running a stable/loose setup with the TC on. I finally got comfortable running it on 10%. Thanks again for the setup!! 👍👍
 
I thought this vid puts it all into perspective. One down many more to go. The House voted 420-0 to release the full report so we as american,s can see for our selfs. Yet the Republican Senate refuse to even allow the issue on the floor for a vote. Trump says release the report, he also said he would release his tax returns. Enjoy the banter with all of you.

 
I thought this vid puts it all into perspective. One down many more to go. The House voted 420-0 to release the full report so we as american,s can see for our selfs. Yet the Republican Senate refuse to even allow the issue on the floor for a vote. Trump says release the report, he also said he would release his tax returns. Enjoy the banter with all of you.



I will watch this at lunch, but anyone who wants to comment, all I ask is keep it civil ladies.
 
I thought this vid puts it all into perspective. One down many more to go. The House voted 420-0 to release the full report so we as american,s can see for our selfs. Yet the Republican Senate refuse to even allow the issue on the floor for a vote. Trump says release the report, he also said he would release his tax returns. Enjoy the banter with all of you.



Alright, I have watched the clip you posted along with your comments. I am not going to discuss or debate you on Trump or Trump's presidency. I know that you are firmly in one camp and I am in another when it comes to that issue. I respect that, but don't see any ground where we can have a discussion on it. However, I think the more interesting and important issue to discuss is how the main stream media, in general, handled the Russia Collusion / Mueller Investigation over the last 675 days. The reason I think this is a more important issue, is because, regardless of your feelings about Trump, after he is gone they will remain. I dare say they have far more power, in terms of influence, than any sitting president could dream to have over the American people.

Over the last 675 days the media have pushed this investigation down the throats of the American people to de-legitimize the 2016 election results. This summary being released, and hopefully the full report soon, puts to rest that the Russians were interfering in the Trump campaign. This means something far worse for the left wing media, it means that Trump was elected legitimately by the American people. All the guests they had on their shows, how much air time they dedicated to this, and how certain they were that "any day now", changes the optics from a legitimate investigation to a witch hunt pushed by the Democrats, propagandized by the media, and paid for by the American tax payer, into nothing more than a conspiracy theory. Van Jones (CNN pundit), famous for saying that Trump's election was a "white lash", is on record as stating the Russian collusion investigation is a giant "nothing burger". He stated this over a year ago. Yet, CNN and others, continued to push this as the nail in the coffin of Trump's presidency that would lead to impeachment.

Van Jones, who I am no fan of, had some interesting comments in a piece with Don Lemon, again not a fan of, on CNN over the weekend after the release of Mueller's summary. I am going to quote him directly here:

"I’ve been trying to tell folks for a long time: there’s no Santa Claus, there’s no Harry Potter with a magic wand. And I can’t tell you how many people over the years have come up to me — serious people, with their hearts broken — saying, “But when Bob Mueller comes, man, he’s gonna get Trump, and Trump’s gonna be out of there — Van, how many more days do you think Trump has left? And I said, “Maybe eight years, if we don’t start working on real issues and not just talking about Robert Mueller all the time.”"

"The “Russia collusion” hoax has undermined the new administration and divided the country. But perhaps its worst damage has been to the Democratic Party itself.

The party establishment became so obsessed with Trump, Russia, and impeachment that it failed to develop an alternative vision, a set of policies that could compete to provide a better life for ordinary Americans (who are, it turns out, doing better than ever under Trump)."


He hits the nail on the head, and I think it is telling when it is coming from someone who is a staunch left-leaning liberal and no-fan of Trump. The Democrats and main stream media should have focused on attacking Trump's policies and developing competing policies, but they didn't. Instead they focused on his character, identity politics, Russia, and porn stars. I truly think that if, whatever classical liberal democrats remain, were to put forward competent policies and a strong candidate, who doesn't resort to identity politics, they would have a good chance of beating Trump. However, it is probably to late for 2020. This summary is a victory for him and his campaign, no denying it, no matter how much you don't like him.

Trump is not the problem, he is s symptom of the problem. We as a country have become so divided, and even worse since 2016, mainly due to the non-stop media slander of Trump and people who voted for him. Trump is a backlash against Identity Politics, Elitism, and Political Correctness. Yes, I know you are going to say that it doesn't make sense to elect and Elite like Trump when you are tired of Elites, but that is one of the reasons none the less. Mainly cause people believe right or wrong that he can't / couldn't be bought off. If these issues persist, even after Trump is gone, another one like him may take his place, again I believe he is a symptom of a deeper divide in the country.

And as we wait for the full report to be released you can already see that the media and their pundits are beginning to move the goals posts. They have doubled, dare I say, tripled down, and are going to die on this hill.

Here are some interesting takes as well. I am sure I missed some items to discuss, but this is all I could formulate at work off the top of my head at the moment.

Sargon of Akkad - Libertarian


Black Pigeon Speaks - Unknown


Jimmy Dore - Liberal / Socialist


Tim Pool - Liberal


I enjoy these kinds of discussions immensely, but please anyone who wishes to join in, keep it emotionless and civil. Thank You. :cheers:
 
You put a lot of thought into that Hazard. :)

I'm with Hazard on this, especially re the sore loser DNC (as I call them), their hoards of DNC affiliated propaganda media, celebrities and sickofans. A lot of people are fed up of them and they only making things worse for themselves. In the end IMO they're going to ensure Trump gets elected for another four years.
 
Alright, I have watched the clip you posted along with your comments. I am not going to discuss or debate you on Trump or Trump's presidency. I know that you are firmly in one camp and I am in another when it comes to that issue. I respect that, but don't see any ground where we can have a discussion on it. However, I think the more interesting and important issue to discuss is how the main stream media, in general, handled the Russia Collusion / Mueller Investigation over the last 675 days. The reason I think this is a more important issue, is because, regardless of your feelings about Trump, after he is gone they will remain. I dare say they have far more power, in terms of influence, than any sitting president could dream to have over the American people.

Over the last 675 days the media have pushed this investigation down the throats of the American people to de-legitimize the 2016 election results. This summary being released, and hopefully the full report soon, puts to rest that the Russians were interfering in the Trump campaign. This means something far worse for the left wing media, it means that Trump was elected legitimately by the American people. All the guests they had on their shows, how much air time they dedicated to this, and how certain they were that "any day now", changes the optics from a legitimate investigation to a witch hunt pushed by the Democrats, propagandized by the media, and paid for by the American tax payer, into nothing more than a conspiracy theory. Van Jones (CNN pundit), famous for saying that Trump's election was a "white lash", is on record as stating the Russian collusion investigation is a giant "nothing burger". He stated this over a year ago. Yet, CNN and others, continued to push this as the nail in the coffin of Trump's presidency that would lead to impeachment.

Van Jones, who I am no fan of, had some interesting comments in a piece with Don Lemon, again not a fan of, on CNN over the weekend after the release of Mueller's summary. I am going to quote him directly here:

"I’ve been trying to tell folks for a long time: there’s no Santa Claus, there’s no Harry Potter with a magic wand. And I can’t tell you how many people over the years have come up to me — serious people, with their hearts broken — saying, “But when Bob Mueller comes, man, he’s gonna get Trump, and Trump’s gonna be out of there — Van, how many more days do you think Trump has left? And I said, “Maybe eight years, if we don’t start working on real issues and not just talking about Robert Mueller all the time.”"

"The “Russia collusion” hoax has undermined the new administration and divided the country. But perhaps its worst damage has been to the Democratic Party itself.

The party establishment became so obsessed with Trump, Russia, and impeachment that it failed to develop an alternative vision, a set of policies that could compete to provide a better life for ordinary Americans (who are, it turns out, doing better than ever under Trump)."


He hits the nail on the head, and I think it is telling when it is coming from someone who is a staunch left-leaning liberal and no-fan of Trump. The Democrats and main stream media should have focused on attacking Trump's policies and developing competing policies, but they didn't. Instead they focused on his character, identity politics, Russia, and porn stars. I truly think that if, whatever classical liberal democrats remain, were to put forward competent policies and a strong candidate, who doesn't resort to identity politics, they would have a good chance of beating Trump. However, it is probably to late for 2020. This summary is a victory for him and his campaign, no denying it, no matter how much you don't like him.

Trump is not the problem, he is s symptom of the problem. We as a country have become so divided, and even worse since 2016, mainly due to the non-stop media slander of Trump and people who voted for him. Trump is a backlash against Identity Politics, Elitism, and Political Correctness. Yes, I know you are going to say that it doesn't make sense to elect and Elite like Trump when you are tired of Elites, but that is one of the reasons none the less. Mainly cause people believe right or wrong that he can't / couldn't be bought off. If these issues persist, even after Trump is gone, another one like him may take his place, again I believe he is a symptom of a deeper divide in the country.

And as we wait for the full report to be released you can already see that the media and their pundits are beginning to move the goals posts. They have doubled, dare I say, tripled down, and are going to die on this hill.

Here are some interesting takes as well. I am sure I missed some items to discuss, but this is all I could formulate at work off the top of my head at the moment.

Sargon of Akkad - Libertarian


Black Pigeon Speaks - Unknown


Jimmy Dore - Liberal / Socialist


Tim Pool - Liberal


I enjoy these kinds of discussions immensely, but please anyone who wishes to join in, keep it emotionless and civil. Thank You. :cheers:

Very well said @HazardLvL4,I usually stay away from discussions on politics and religion but I'm gonna weigh in on this.You would think I would be all for the democratic party since I'm supporting my family on the measly government disability check I get ever month, but since they would rather take care of illegal immigrants instead of Americans that busted their ass for 30yrs and veterans that fought for this country, I feel quite the opposite. My wife has been out of work and going to school for 2yrs now and has as many or more medical issues that I have,but can't go to the doctor because she falls into some kind of BS insurance loophole so she has no insurance. I'm not even gonna go down that road because i consider you guys as friends and don't want to upset anyone, but just know this system is f**cked up and unfortunately the dems nor Republicans have a good answer for it.
 
Alright, I have watched the clip you posted along with your comments. I am not going to discuss or debate you on Trump or Trump's presidency. I know that you are firmly in one camp and I am in another when it comes to that issue. I respect that, but don't see any ground where we can have a discussion on it.

You miss the point. I am truly sorry you think we can not have a discussion on the issues. I posted the clip as a parody. In jest, as humor. I can easily post clips of some serious events and policies , such as Mr Trump during his State of the Union, promising to protect pre existing conditions, now today he want to eliminate that protection. I am a cancer survivor, protecting insurance coverage for pre existing conditions is not an option, it is mandatory.

Trump is not the problem, he is s symptom of the problem. We as a country have become so divided, and even worse since 2016, mainly due to the non-stop media slander of Trump and people who voted for him.
Media slander ? So Hannity, Limbaugh, Jones, Pirro, Ingraham, and numerous others have for the last 10 years contributed also to the divide of our country. I know you are smart enough to understand these people are not the media, they are opinion personalities and do not have to rely on the facts , only their opinions, and the cancer spreads.

This summary is a victory for him and his campaign, no denying it, no matter how much you don't like him.
Could not agree more with you. It is a huge victory. See, we can agree on some items. That is until the full Mueller report is released. ;):lol:

As far a Rachel is concerned, she is not my cup of tea. She falls into that group of opinion news, if I agreed with them, then we would both be wrong.
 
I know you said to keep this civil - and "kinda" wished I hadn't posted that funny meme earlier... but here goes.

Last Thursday (while I felt like a hammered dog turd) a few of you all got into talking about guns and someone said (could care less who) that the 2nd Am. didn't "mean" to include a clip or magazine [whatever your choice] that held 30 bullets... don't know how they know that that is what the 2nd Am meant, but here it is for a refresher, just as an FYI:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Now, some will say this means a State run military, but it doesn't. That word militia dates back to around the 1060's whence it meant: a fyrd, which:

consisted of every able-bodied male of military age.

Hence, we the People. Any people that live under that Lord's house (or territory if you will).
We, the people, have a God given right to protect ourselves - how we see fit from a tyrannical gov't being foreign or domestic. It has nothing to do with Hunting!! That has been about the most uneducated thing, or statement made since I've been racing with you guys. Now, I don't hunt, never have, but you come into my house uninvited (by force or whatever other means that are threatening) and you better have a gun because you will have some holes in you before you leave. I don't mind buying new carpet or having the wood floors re-sanded and stained. Also, if you don't want to keep a gun(s) in your house, that's your choice and I would never chastise you for that position - but please don't chastise me for mine. If you can't accept that you can go pound sand. :D

I know this was off-topic at hand - but I wanted to say something last week but was just too pooped to even bother. . .

Carry-on. :cheers:
 
You miss the point. I am truly sorry you think we can not have a discussion on the issues. I posted the clip as a parody. In jest, as humor. I can easily post clips of some serious events and policies , such as Mr Trump during his State of the Union, promising to protect pre existing conditions, now today he want to eliminate that protection. I am a cancer survivor, protecting insurance coverage for pre existing conditions is not an option, it is mandatory.


Media slander ? So Hannity, Limbaugh, Jones, Pirro, Ingraham, and numerous others have for the last 10 years contributed also to the divide of our country. I know you are smart enough to understand these people are not the media, they are opinion personalities and do not have to rely on the facts , only their opinions, and the cancer spreads.

Could not agree more with you. It is a huge victory. See, we can agree on some items. That is until the full Mueller report is released. ;):lol:

As far a Rachel is concerned, she is not my cup of tea. She falls into that group of opinion news, if I agreed with them, then we would both be wrong.

Alright, let me clear that first comment up a bit. The reason I put it that way is not that I truly believe you and I can't have a discussion on the issues. I said that cause of seeing how conversations between Alex and yourself devolve into just who can talk louder at each other lol. That is what I was thinking in my head and wanted to avoid that. I believe we can discuss issues and debate, just know I am not about who can be louder than the other guy lol.

I agree, pre-existing conditions must be mandatory, you won't get an argument from me there.

Nope, I don't give them a pass. I agree Fox News and it's pundits are just as culpable. Especially back during the days of Glen Beck. I tend to watch and read numerous sources and formulate my opinions that way. Regardless of political stance the main stream media is cancer. I stuck with liberal examples for what I wrote, just cause you used a liberal example with Stephen Colbert. I figured had I used right-leaning or republican examples that would have been expected from me.

Oh, I know we can agree on some things :cheers::lol:, and you are right, I am just as excited as you to see the full report. Did you see they are going to Subpoena Mueller now?

Rachel is not my cup of tea either, obviously, she is the Glen Beck of this presidency.

*PS - I knew you were being humorous with the Colbert post. I didn't fall on deaf ears, and he got me to laugh a little, shocker I know! :lol:
 
You miss the point. I am truly sorry you think we can not have a discussion on the issues. I posted the clip as a parody. In jest, as humor. I can easily post clips of some serious events and policies , such as Mr Trump during his State of the Union, promising to protect pre existing conditions, now today he want to eliminate that protection. I am a cancer survivor, protecting insurance coverage for pre existing conditions is not an option, it is mandatory.

I'm just being a curious monkey... what do yo mean by this?? Are you saying it's Mr. (he is your president, just as I considered President Obama mine) Trump that has somehow reneged on covering pre-existing conditions? I have the ACA full text and the Reconciliation Act of the ACA on my hard drive and can look it up for you - just as we were promised that abortions were NOT in the ACA (they are, btw), the verbage of the ACA gave "the Secretary" (ie., the standing DHS secretary) the authority to "..shall establish criteria for determining whether health insurance issuers and employment-based health plans have discouraged an individual from remaining enrolled in prior coverage based on that individual’s health status.

AND

"has a pre-existing condition, as determined in a manner
consistent with guidance issued by the Secretary."

Public Law 111-148, 124 STAT. 142 (24-906)

If you would prefer I post the entire statute, I certainly can... but it states that it is ultimately up to the DHS secretary to establish the guidance (or guidelines, if you will) whom is eligible. The next biggie, for you being a "c" survivor, is the section (e) that follows: PROTECTION AGAINST DUMPING RISK BY INSURERS.

If you would like to read that section it follows right behind, but basically puts it, AGAIN, squarely in the DHS secretaries lap, and whatever he/she establish...

Having read this entire bill, yes, back in 2010 I read the entire thing - and yes, I'm probably a moron... but what I can say (and you certainly don't have to believe me - in fact DON'T, download it yourself and read it) is that Mr. Obamacare put so much of our personal healthcare in the hands of 1 <--- yes, one, person that it is scary. Thank God that our government works like a tin man that's been in the rain for 50 years and (most) health insurance doesn't wait for government approvals.

Anyway, not trying to start anything here, was really just curious what you meant by that snippet.

And, while I could spend the next 4-5 hours talking health care and law, it's not really necessary.

So. . . . who's practicing tonight. :p :D
 
Trump that has somehow reneged on covering pre-existing conditions?

Yes.

Suggest you google your favorite news coverage for further info rather than listing attachments from a source you may not agree with.
 
Yes.

Suggest you google your favorite news coverage for further info rather than listing attachments from a source you may not agree with.
Didn't we just agree that the main stream media was all just opinion givers, asking for a friend:lol:.
 
I'm in the high 1:35's / low 1:36's when I don't screw it up. . . which isn't often.

Ran a 12 lap race and only managed a 1:35.240. That's the best I can muster, practice, qualify or racing. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Back