Last edited:
What did you did there.... I see it.View attachment 1442524
The Pigeons do not give a Flying Rat's ass about Gizmo sitting 2 metres away.
That's cute and adorable...nice!!So I bought a new-to-me camera on eBay, one I've been drooling over ever since it came out. Digressing to photographer-speak, I've been a Nikon guy for over 30 years, having been through a borrowed D70, then my own D50, D5000, D7000, D7200, and now D500. I do have a D800 full-frame, famous for its ultra-high resolution and extreme low-light capability, but useless as a sports camera with less than 4 frames per second continuous shutter speed. I have an audacious amount of legacy lenses, so the switch to mirrorless hasn't tempted me too much; the legacy lenses might work, might not, with the mount adapters to put them onto a mirrorless camera. But the D500 approaches the D800 in low-light capability, and has a continuous shooting capability of about 10 frames per second, and so far I've reached 78 frames before I gave up waiting for it to stop for buffering. It came with what is regarded as Nikon's best DX lens, the 16-80 f:2.8-4, which I'm absolutely delighted with.
I had to try a couple of my other lenses with it real quick. First is my Sigma 30mm f:1.4, and of course I had to try it wide open. This is Chipsie being a good little princess for me. Successful test of my only 3rd-party AF lens.
![]()
And next is one of my legacy lenses, and AI-converted manual-focus Nikon 85mm f:1.8. The D500 is able to read the aperture ring setting and do aperture-priority metering with this lens, and the viewfinder focus dot shows me the focus precision correctly, which were parts of my checks with this shot.
Depth-of-field is ridiculous this close. I focused on her little pink nose, and her eyes and chin are already blurring.
![]()
EDIT: added a 1-1 crop of her nose, just to show focus detail. Not a pet picture so much as a lens verification.
![]()