- 6,847
- SeismicGravy
Or This Mustang:
![]()
Why the hell not?
Why not?
Because it's stupid. I'm sorry, but it is.
There are probably precious few of those in original condition as it is.
Or This Mustang:
![]()
Why the hell not?
Been playing a bit too much Gran Turismo, eh?No rear spoiler = No rear grip
So, you could have either a 2.8L V6 (90-115 BHP), a 2.3L I4 (88BHP) or a 5.0L V8 (122BHP) in a Mustang II, or you could put an RB26DETT in it that probably weighs less than everything but the 2.3L and has "276" BHP. Now I understand that it would be more, for lack of a better term, "American," to instead put a newer 5.0L in it (ignoring the fact that the RB26 would still have more power regardless), but who cares? It is a Mustang II.Why not?
Because it's stupid. I'm sorry, but it is.
And that is a bad thing because...TVRKingThere are probably precious few of those in original condition as it is.
So, you could have either a 2.8L V6 (90-115 BHP), a 2.3L I4 (88BHP) or a 5.0L V8 (122BHP) in a Mustang II, or you could put an RB26DETT in it that probably weighs less than everything but the 2.3L and has "276" BHP. Now I understand that it would be more, for lack of a better term, "American," to instead put a newer 5.0L in it (ignoring the fact that the RB26 would still have more power regardless), but who cares? It is a Mustang II.
And that is a bad thing because...
The only good sporty car based on the Pinto was the Pangra, and the Mustang II is no exception to this.
Been playing a bit too much Gran Turismo, eh?
Awesome, looks like the chick on in paintjob is farting flames!
The rims are from a GTO, right?
i popped a site intop my favourites a while ago so i could ridicule some of the creations it spurned.
heres what i found.
![]()
![]()
yep thats a 'speakership' of some description
![]()
easily could be mistaken for a bomb...