Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,995 comments
  • 3,459,624 views
Diablo'
Everybody has different opinions of what questionable is.

stumpydino thought that this car was questionable, but in my opinion it is not. Does that mean that i have the right to say that it is completely not questionable, no, its just a difference of opinions
Click to expand...

wtf is it
 
GT40 MKII
What Was It Originally??
Click to expand...

That I don't know. It's obviously based of an older American car, but it has no defining features to say that its anything but a salt flats car with a body based off an American classic.

I don't know much about cars from that era, but if someone did, i'd suspect that the windshield and rear window (the little window behind the drivers side window) would be a key feature as to what it is.
 
That looks like a fiberglass body custom built.

I really don't think it's fair to call it a Questionable Mod, because it's not modified, it's scratch built from the ground up.
 
i just looked very carefully at it and it looks like a 41 willys type nose...
see the pic for reference i think though it was very heavily altered for aerodynamic purposes
 
GT40 MKII
i just looked very carefully at it and it looks like a 41 willys type nose...
see the pic for reference i think though it was very heavily altered for aerodynamic purposes
Click to expand...

The front looks just about right
 
GT40 MKII
i just looked very carefully at it and it looks like a 41 willys type nose...
see the pic for reference i think though it was very heavily altered for aerodynamic purposes
Click to expand...

Is that a picture from the hot rods,muscle cars,customs Thread?
A picture that i posted in that Thread.:grumpy:








;) 2000 Posts.:)
 
(Oh, I hope this isn't a repost)
Enter the Hummer GT.
Classic american supercar it ain't
 
Wasn't that done by some German tuning company?
 
Just another concept sketch on a vehicle Lamborghini's Winkelmann reported they would not be building.
 
i really think that Lamborghini does NOT need an SUV or a truck or a f ing crossover.
 
Every car maker needs an SUV now, it's the in thing to do.
 
I WILL say it looks better than the flop Cheetah, though:
A mid engine tractor would never work, so why would this?
 
stumpydino thought that this car was questionable, but in my opinion it is not. Does that mean that i have the right to say that it is completely not questionable, no, its just a difference of opinions
Click to expand...

i post stuff that would be questionable in a matter of taste sometimes, not necessarily a stab at practicality, just somethin looking/designed crazy, i still thought the chopped/sectioned etc. willys salt flats racer was cool
 
That's so cool! :o
 
dammit, I can't give -rep unless I put a reason!
 
I love rat well that's half rat right?

BTW, Danachronism love the tar. :lol:

edit: oh, this is not the hot rod thread. :dopey:
 
Not too sure about the 'skinny' whitewalls. :indiff:
 
You know, for a moment I forgot I had clicked on "Questionable Modifications."

That VW is awesome.
 
If those things above the wheels (what do you call 'em? EDIT: Fenders) were a little wider, and perhaps slightly smaller wheels, that thing would be the definition of looking cool.
 
BigdaddyGT
I WILL say it looks better than the flop Cheetah, though:
A mid engine tractor would never work, so why would this?
Click to expand...

*That was actually considered long before the Hummer for the U.S. Army. It was an extremely off-road capable vehicle.
 
Back