Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,995 comments
  • 3,460,694 views
That Lancer:

facepalm_meme_cover_for_the_ipad_mini-r0e8217b418d740abb5a48f980e8a732a_vaspz_8byvr_216.jpg


Why, oh, why do you think eight "exhausts" look good? Do you're momma drop you when you were young?
 
More soundz haha
 
Last edited:
What's questionable about the A4? I wouldn't put a shoe behind my rear window but it's easily removable?
 
That Audi looks perfectly fine. And I like the taillights on that Lancer.
 
Oops linked the wrong image haha. My bad.
 
So, apparently this is what the Torro Rosso team use to deliver one of their old cars for a uni visit in Italy recently:

F11M0bE.jpg


dfoMXEb.jpg


MaYGSNJ.jpg


I'm not sure why someone decided to use a Multipla as a base for such a modification, or why an F1 team chose it over any other transport vehicle. It looks like the three-abreast seating in the front was removed to make more room though.
 
538775_561120317253320_149480638_n.jpg
 

Those pipes are not very "chico". Maybe he is overcompensating for "el chico"
 
I think he was compensating for the other 2 he doesn't have. Wink wink.
 
Those exhausts are nothing compared to those wheels and brakes!
 
Looks like an Evo, and it looks like it's painted with highlighter.
 
No flared fenders. Not an EVO
107940d1273052994-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-mitsubishi-evo-x-2-big.jpg
That one just has some silly LEDs, a wrap or plasti dip and some extremely stupid exhaust tips.
 
Hah, that's good to know. It seems that normal Lancers have a circular gas cap rather than the square one found on the Evos. Oh, and the bumper is from a base Lancer. Just realized that.
 
Craiglist...

Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
3K43Ld3J45Le5Gd5E8d3r6b1efe3d9f2414ca.jpg

3E43Gc3H75Le5E45J9d3rb92e377d080c138e.jpg


Cadillac
3E13J13N45I15N95L2d3i29cda87c015c162d.jpg

3K93Md3H55Ib5Lc5H9d3ib19bf375429312ea.jpg
 
At least it's pretty well executed. Could have sworn that car might have been in Fast and the Furious, but alas, it is not as my memory can be pretty bad at times. And I know now, the Eclipse was purple.
 
:lol:


You're just melding the two Eclipses from the first two movies together, I bet.
 
There's one in the first one? :odd:

EDIT:

Well after some brief research, I feel like an idiot. :dopey:
 
The one that he blows the floor pan off with too much NAWS!! in the race in the beginning. That one was that color, it was just a second generation Eclipse rather than a 3rd gen like the one from the second movie.
 
That's what I got confused about, the generation identification. I should probably re-watch the movies before I say something about them again. But they're not good movies....
 
I would buy that Cadi ..



... just so I could take care of it and fix it like a Cadi, not pimpmobile.
 
Questionable?

$T2eC16h,!yEE9s5jHQS!BRSiQYrC6w~~60_12.JPG


$T2eC16d,!)UE9s3wDcyUBRSiQY)zow~~60_12.JPG


I'd say so, though not in the same league as some of the cars on here....
 
That would actually look a lot better if you couldn't tell what the taillights came from. I like the front.
 
I think if the front was less "busy" it could all work as a whole.

$T2eC16Z,!zQE9s3stvK9BRSiQ37,lw~~60_12.JPG
 
Back