- 8,238
- United Kingdom
Questionable modifications: pictures inside!
- Thread starter -Fred-
- 38,911 comments
- 3,191,161 views
- 3,023
- Peruibe, SP
That almost looks legit. Scrapped unfortunately...I'd give it a shot though.
- 15,230
- Grandville Mi
- Gotbeefboy564
- Got beef boy564
Good god why?
- 17,119
- Melbourne
- ScottPuss20
- CheetahsMeow
It was only a matter of time before someone did it.
- 1,309
- LT
R5
(Banned)
- 7,527
- Location, Location
- 3,023
- Peruibe, SP
Mmmmmmmkay
I couldn't tell if was based on the F40, alright? Plus, I don't know what car was used to make a bootleg version of it.
- 2,605
- Newport
- NFSCARBON1
Does anyone know what this was?
I know it's supposed to be an F40 'replica' but if they'd put a short hatch on the back (think group B Quattro or Delta S4) I'd actually like it.
Downhill Dino
Premium
- 11,760
- Maryland
- DownhillDinosaur
It's a Datsun 280zx 2+2.
The front isn't so bad I'd say. Whatever the rest that's going on is what's wrong.
The front isn't so bad I'd say. Whatever the rest that's going on is what's wrong.
- 3,023
- Peruibe, SP
...why. Such waste of a perfectly already decent Camaro. I don't get people these days.
- 574
- Tennessee
- Wynter92
Good waste of a miata...
Also, this Cayenne..as if Cayenne weren't bad enough, this got worse.
Disgusting.
I used to live near a guy who had that same kit on a white Cayenne, it doesn't look any better in person. At least the white one had an exhaust system which made it sound like pure evil.
MedigoFlame
Premium
- 6,244
- Maine
- MedigoFlameX
- 17,119
- Melbourne
- ScottPuss20
- CheetahsMeow
I hate to say it but it actually looks better than the original...
- 4,763
- Houston, TX
Japanese "VIP" styling has gone so over the top recently. US owner's take on the scene is a bit more tasteful!
- 15,230
- Grandville Mi
- Gotbeefboy564
- Got beef boy564
- 7,182
- Massachusetts
- llClaude_Speedll
- BlazingSol05
The things I see at work...
- 30,452
- a baby, candy, it's like taking.
- TexRex72
For a moment, I thought that spoiler was far worse than it really is--turns out I was fooled by that Ridgeline's rear arch flare.
Edit: Keep in mind that the bed fitted in place of a trunk lid is likely original to the car--Chevrolet offered a "Foreman's Coupe" in 1936 that was exactly that--but the rolling stock (which doesn't fit physically, let alone aesthetically) and exhaust tips are far beyond tacky.
Last edited:
Cano
Premium
- 20,758
- Cephiro
Edit: Keep in mind that the bed fitted in place of a trunk lid is likely original to the car--Chevrolet offered a "Foreman's Coupe" in 1936 that was exactly that--but the rolling stock (which doesn't fit physically, let alone aesthetically) and exhaust tips are far beyond tacky.
Dear god kill it.
- 3,461
- Melbourne
Hahaha I like that because there's no chance of anyone thinking it's real. Like a caricature.
- 4,487
- YorkshireLand
- SVTlover
I do. They were better and more obvious than the 2010s chavs with their silly fad of slamming cars.
Back then they actually had cars that had better capabilities of going over speedbumps.
- 3,023
- Peruibe, SP
...Holy...what...the...****.
Last edited:
