Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Fred-
  • 38,913 comments
  • 3,252,292 views
And if you don't like this, you are also a retard.
p2_m.jpg
That's not a truck though. That's basically a Nissan Skyline GT-R Station Wagon.

And it's stock.
 
[late rant] Everyone needs to shut up about not liking lowered trucks. Because if you don't like lowered trucks, then you don't like this:
53ford1.jpg

And if you don't like that, then you are a retard.

I hope your joking...
 
I guess I'm a retard, then. Give it the height and stance that a truck should have, and then it'd be cool.

Also, the Stagea is a wagon.

A truck like that looks even better lowered imo. It's not like your going to be using it as a truck once you've restored it to that point.

Hot rod and Rat rod trucks look absolutely amazing lowered, mini trucks on the other hand :yuck:

It's all about taste.
 
It's all about taste.

EXACTLY, and everyones taste is different so I don't want to hear " all lowered trucks are retarded" or " all ricers are retarded" because if you think everyone has the same taste then it's YOU that is retarded. Most things in here will be agreed on as ugly and pointless (except by sakiale but he's special :sly: ) but when you don't like something someone else does, agree to disagree! ::deep breath::
 
Just to feed the slammed truck haters. Back in the day I had an 87 Nissan that I slammed within a few inches of the ground. Would I do it again? Nope. Did I think it was great then...yep!



 
Lowered trucks are questionable, that's why they are in this thread. Ricers are questionable, hence the reason they are in this thread. Who cares about your taste, that has nothing to do with whether or not it belongs in this thread.
 
Well I was looking for a Model T or one of the Barris Kustoms but couldn't find a good one...also, the Stagea is for all the importhaters. Shouldve made that clear.

And Stagea =/= ricer.
 
Lowered trucks are questionable, that's why they are in this thread. Ricers are questionable, hence the reason they are in this thread. Who cares about your taste, that has nothing to do with whether or not it belongs in this thread.

Taking a Civic and thinking it's a sports car is also questionable as well. Economy cars should be left as just that. As far as I'm concerned every economy based "import" should be put in this thread. Supra's, RX-7's, Skylines, etc. are designed to be sports cars and can be treated as such.
 

This is not only questionable but it's not a good truck to begin with, no one wants a pseudo sporty Dakota with Mitsubishi badges on it. And yes the rest of those can be considered questionable as well. And always my point is that what's questionable is left up to the person's taste. I happen to like some of the lowered truck, but on the same token I think people who think Civics are sports cars need their heads checked. I'm sure other think vice versa.

** the only good thing about the Raider was the commercial where it made other trucks wet themselves with fear.
 
It's a concept truck that was shown as the NAIAS, it was more or less built by MOPAR. I would hope to god that a manufacturer's performance department could build something half way decent.
 
If Joey and PB's rules hold true, then

Questionable =
94renault_espace_f1_12.jpg

trophy.jpg

24258895_9e73d9f96d.jpg

Renault Espace F1:
Is it questionable? Yes, but its just a concept car. A good one at that. It would be cool to send your kids in one of those.

Renault Clio V6:
Not questionable at all! I mean sure its a mid-engine hatchback. But they did that for many good reasons. Its to make the car handle well, give a good weight distribution and a low center of gravity. It was also used for racing and has a unique sports car feel....

Hachi-Roku:
A Malaysian?........Damn! Now that guy needs to give being a fanboy and actually do something more important. However, the way those people are looking at the car, i guess its okay to get joked on like that....(and probably lose some dignity) :lol:
 
Renault Clio V6:
Not questionable at all! I mean sure its a mid-engine hatchback. But they did that for many good reasons. Its to make the car handle well, give a good weight distribution and a low center of gravity. It was also used for racing and has a unique sports car feel....

Totally agree! 👍

If you've ever been lucky enough to have driven one of these, or even just been a passenger,
then you will know exactly how damn awesome they really are. 👍
Small, short wheelbase hatchback, with a V6 that's IN THE BACK!.
You've got to have larger than average sized nuts to push one of these Clios.
I drove one... Unbeleivable, but my nuts are average sized.
The owner on the other hand pushed it hard and scared the crap out of me!! :scared:

Not questionable, but very cool!, (but then again I'm biased)
 
But.. why are there three? I had no difficulty pushing my tub of 1960 Biscayne. That's lighter than a 1960s sedan.
 
Back